Wrong, and for you to understand that, you should play some sea of thieve. Having a Lookout at all time during a warship is essential, as the crew needs to know the position of the ennemy at all time.
We're talking about One Piece NOT Sea of Thieves.
You'd have a point if Oda ever actually showed that scenario or as a need during a battle which he has never done.
I don't "expect it, it has already happened. Carrot being at the crows nest was the sole reason the crew made it to Cacao Island. The thing is, from her crow's next and if the Sulong is possible (what I call a specific situation) then she is able to jump from her post directly into the battle. That's what makes her post so cool.
So mostly useless except for a specific special situation. That's not cool.
He already has >> whole cake
I mean as an actual need for the crew. Not at any point is the crew like we really need a full time lookout especially after when they escape. Nobody is like good thing Carrot was here as lookout.
It does, without Carrot, the crew would have gone down.
False.
They have others things to do.
Unless one of them is actually doing that. Its as simple as that.
Oh yes it is.
No. I don't think you know how to properly support this stance.
The comment of Oda on the SBS is exactly that : UNDENIABLE. (in all caps)
The comment in the sbs has nothing to do with a lookout. Its the schedule of when the members sleep and if you look at it one or several of the crew are awake at all times.
I don't even think you know what you're calling undeniable at this point. You're just repeating it.
yes, if you want to be the best look out possible.
So you don't know what qualifications or requirements or what the job consists of. At least that's clear now.
Rabbits are by ESSENCE always looking for predator, that's why they have a weird sleeping schedule and that they never sleeps entirerely.
LOL
Usopp is just scared.
Usopp is ALWAYS looking out for danger. It is his very nature. Carrot's just an ignorant rabbit.
Oh yes it was, for Luffy. he expressed that need multiple time.
You seem to not know what the word need means or the difference between a need and a want. Luffy wanted a musician. It wasn't a necessity. Just something he really wanted. At no point is it stated in the story as a need. If you think it's a need that's just your very incorrect opinion.
Yup, my point.
So you agree the lookout position is not a need and not a want expressed by anyone in the crew.
Yes, it did but very subtly. You can see that around chapter 826 I think. Brook and Luffy and Nami are ""arguing"" on who should take the helm and the fact that Luffy was doing a poor job at it. This need doesn't need to be obvious, it can be very.. very subtle, but it's always pretty much there. This is one of the pattern for each mugiwara, sometime Oda even take a bit of time to focus on the impossibility of a crewmate to do the job and make another crewmate do it (brook in that example)
Again this is just your subjective opinion based on your interpretation.
If you think your interpretation is the only right one that's your problem.
Until a very SPECIFIC situation where no one was able to make a move to the helm. That's where Oda choosed to make Jinbe take responsibilities by entering the green Room. And that's my point, each job can be fullfill by another UNTIL a very specific situation where the role must go to the one crewmate who has capacity to act with the most efficiancy. That's when Oda made Jinbe's shine and this is also when he choosed to make Carrot shine.
This doesn't change anything I said about the difference about a need or a want or that Oda created a situation to show Jimbe's skill as a helmsman.
Observe that those
are depicted in the SAME Volume. You can even check the side of the volume, it's Jinbe and Carrot. That's because those two protagonist are two side of the same coin. They are complementary, like the Sun and the moon.
What is this, meta clues bullshit?
This doesn't support your point in my eyes.
Poorly, Usopp has to crawl to the nest,
Irrelevant.
and Robin is doing a poor job.
Until she began to do a good job in the very same chapter.
No, I do this by experience, to prevent some unecessary replies. I've gone through those argument more time that I can count, I prefer to make them go faster because I know for a fact the argument that will follow. It's not rocket science.
I don't give a fuck about any of that.
Reply to what I post. Not what you think I might post in the future.
If not you can reply to someone else.
See, that the type of reply that people make when I make narrative arguments. They can't understand them .. so "it's all made up"
If you can't support your stance with facts or with what happens in the story to at least point be support for your argument and instead have to make up definitions and make up qualifications for a position that is not a need then I don't see a reason to entertain it.
I understand that you think you're using the narrative but you should reconsider if its the narrative or how you're choosing to use it with bias.
The thing is, this is what authors call
this is not "made up" this is an actual storytelling technic. Oda - for example - will push EVERY paramater of a design to fit a position. For example, Franky can be seen as creative and capable at first sight! His post is litterally reflected by his posture, his design, his manner, his color and his story.. That's the power of milking. It enhance the power of a message through narrative and visual clews.
You can think that if you want to. Its not good support the way you're using it for your stance though.
so..
…. The optimized design of Carrot is no different ! From her design (a rabbit who can jump fast) to her posture, someone who look at the world like a wonderland, Oda made Carrot as the perfect look out for Luffy, in his words (Oda - on the design of Carrot): "Carrot had to be first jovial"
Again, this is nothing but a subjective opinion.
Carrot is Alice in wonderland, she the one who discovers, who watchs, who experiences.
You have to be able to know when you're presenting your interpretation and when you're giving an example of something from the story supporting your argument. Right now it doesn't seem like you can tell the difference.
It just reads like you spout a lot of opinion and things that are your interpretation and then say this is UNDENIABLE and you're wrong if you disagree. If you've already convinced yourself you're right then just wait until the story proves everything you came up with wrong.
This is not a subjective opinion,
Its a perfect example of a subjective opinion.
this is a litteral storytelling analysis, a real one, from the visual to the writings.
Based off a definition you made up and your interpretation of the visuals.
Just calling something real doesn't make it "real".
Oh yes it is. There is no better look out for Luffy than someone who is excited by each discovery.
Its amazing how little objectivity exists in your posts especially with all these very obvious statements presented as facts when they are not.
Narration is inevitable, undeniable..
Not when you confuse your interpretation for narrative.
You can argue against it for a while, but it will show you that you are wrong in the long run..
Keep this in mind a year from now
And narration, might it be visual or litteral, is on the side of Carrot, not smoker, not Yamato, not Law… Carrot.
LOL
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
Buy popular character merch please. Thanks.
https://i.imgur.com/STLif6l.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/pxmHSHk.jpg
Now we know who the last 3 strawhats will be, right?
