American Politics thread: No Nazis Allowed

RoboBlue

Because I know his views and thoughts. It was never one of his target speeches that I've seen and the time he has lightly mentioned paedophiles is with hatred likening it with Transsexualism which is his other hatred.

Paedophilia will probably become in the mainstream soon. Hell it's disgusting, but looks like all these pedo's are gonna start "coming out".
Another sexual orientation or seuxality view? Let's add P to LGBTQ

Do you sincerely believe that Paedophilia will ever be accepted in America? If so… who told you that, and why did you believe them?
Did they provide any evidence that our world is coming apart at the seams outside of videos/tweets/tumblr posts from a few crazy individuals?

Ubiq

The imbecilic notion that acceptance of gay and trans people will automatically and irrevocably pave the way to acceptance of pedophilia and bestiality is pretty firmly entrenched on the right.

Though I guess that one Republican Senator saying that people would soon be perfectly okay with a human being marrying a box turtle was kinda proven right since the GOP didn't object to Elaine Chao being nominated for Secretary of Transportation.

Kaiolino

@SuburbanErrorist:

In the same article you linked me in

“The people who seem to be after it most are the people who are Hillary supporters, not Trump supporters,” Weiser said. “He seems to have taken a stronger position on Israel than Hillary is, and the Democrats and Hillary don’t want to lose any votes over it. So what are they going to do? They’re going to accuse him of being anti-Semitic.

Hillary is extremely pro-Israel so dumb argument.

Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, who is Jewish and a key adviser to the campaign, penned an op-ed this week titled, “The Donald Trump I Know,” which said Trump was being unfairly held accountable for “utterances of even the most fringe of his supporters.”

“My father-in-law is not an anti-Semite,” wrote Kushner, who is publisher of the New York Observer and is married to Trump’s daughter Ivanka.

Trump has cited his Jewish family members — Ivanka converted to Judaism — as evidence of his warm feelings toward Jews. But Kushner’s piece revealed a rift in his family over his work on behalf of Trump. Some of Kushner’s relatives posted messages Thursday expressing dismay that his op-ed had invoked his grandparents’ experience as Holocaust survivors.

“I have a different take-away from my Grandparents’ experience in the war,” Marc Kushner, Jared Kushner’s cousin, wrote on Facebook on Thursday in comments first reported by Politico. “It is our responsibility as the next generation to speak up against hate. Anti-semitism or otherwise.”

Besides the "I have black friends so I can't be racist defense", did you actually see the second half of the stuff you posted here. Kushner's OWN family is disgusted by him.

So his comment not mentioning Jews but mentioning all the victims is bad? It would be a huge disservice to the 1/3 which were not Jews.

This is the definition of Holocaust denial, because it denies that the Nazis first and foremost targeted the extermination of all Jews. "All Lives Matter"-ing the Holocaust is pretty disgusting tbh.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/31/deborah-lipstadt-historian-donald-trump-advisers-soft-holocaust-denial

Also Stormfront was cheering the statement because they understood the dogwhistle.

Israeli Prime Minister understands things better than most people tbh

Israeli Prime Minister is a war criminal (and also just a regular corrupt criminal) who pretends to speak for all Jews when he only has a slim majority in the Knesset (and his party has an outright minority) and 75% of American Jews voted for Hillary Clinton.

http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.772644

Interesting article.

That article is behind a paywall and I sincerely doubt you're subscribed to a leftist Israeli newspaper.

But if you ARE subscribed to Haaretz, here is another paywall article that argues Trump is, in fact, an anti-Semite: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.772405

MetaMario

@Zar:

It's been one month. One. Month.

RoboBlue

@Ubiq:

The imbecilic notion that acceptance of gay and trans people will automatically and irrevocably pave the way to acceptance of pedophilia and bestiality is pretty firmly entrenched on the right.

Though I guess that one Republican Senator saying that people would soon be perfectly okay with a human being marrying a box turtle was kinda proven right since the GOP didn't object to Elaine Chao being nominated for Secretary of Transportation.

That should cast doubt on how serious the few individuals who came forward advocating for "pedo rights" were.

sgamer82

@SuburbanErrorist:

He is being incorrectly portrayed.

https://www.google.com.au/amp/www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/21/heres-why-the-progressive-left-keeps-sticking-up-for-pedophiles/amp/?client=ms-android-samsung

This is his stance on it, fighting against the soon coming up "Pedophile" movement.

I meant do we want to understand Milo in general? Because that aforementioned impression I have of him is that of a hate-monger in Breitbart's finest mold who has gone after individuals, including college students, who protested his presence. In one case I found looking up examples, he actively outed a trans student to a crowd during a livestreamed event, or, if you want to use Breitbart's take on it, he "Liberated UWM Women’s Locker Rooms From Trans Student"

If nothing else, Twitter banned him before they'd ban Donald Trump.

Incidentally, looking up that story has made me pretty clear on my stance where Yiannopoulos. He's definitely not a man I'd want to have anything to do with in any way, shape, or form. Not when it's the Breitbart article quoting him with “If all it takes are a few strong words from me to make trans people leave women in peace in their bathrooms, I’m definitely going to up the ante. Really, if he can’t take a joke, how is he going to cope with having his dick cut off?” and treating it as a positive thing.

Strooger

@Zar:

Don't worry, we're investigating the perpetrators behind the missing Kebab. Everything points to a certain chef.

In all seriousness though, it's worrisome and annoying. Trump is lying about serious events and apparently gets his international info from Fox News. Small countries like mine need a good reputation, it's dangerous for such an influential person to play with it like it's the new hip thing to bash.

This will certainly create a huge spike in SD-voters as well. I mean, there is basically nothing related to the topic that doesn't. But it will cause a lot of people to look towards right wing echo-chambers even more than usual. I'm probably going to stay away from Youtube and news in general for a while thanks to this whole debacle.

Monkey King

@SuburbanErrorist:

Because I know his views and thoughts. It was never one of his target speeches that I've seen and the time he has lightly mentioned paedophiles is with hatred likening it with Transsexualism which is his other hatred.

Paedophilia will probably become in the mainstream soon. Hell it's disgusting, but looks like all these pedo's are gonna start "coming out".
Another sexual orientation or seuxality view? Let's add P to LGBTQ

Its almost as if there's a big difference between those five things and the P!
Hmmmmmm, what could that be?

Kaiolino

Alex Jones is "apparently taking on a new role as occasional information source and validator for the president of the United States"

Monkey King

@SuburbanErrorist:

Horrifyingly, there are signs of a new pedophile acceptance movement forming on the Left. Just as Allen West warned, the gay rights movement is being used as a template. First comes the argument that pedophiles are just “born that way,” absolving them of any moral responsibility for their desires. Then comes the argument that pedophiles are just normal people, like the rest of us, but somehow impoverished or victimised by their own condition.

Inevitably, our society’s current ostracisation of pedophiles will be portrayed as an injustice: an oppression from which pedophiles must be liberated, or for which they deserve our sympathy. And woe to the oppressors! Quietly, in progressive columns and academies around the world, progressives are losing their footing and sliding down that slippery slope. Publications like Salon are abetting the turpitude.

It is particularly crucial to protect children from pedophiles in the age of the internet, when adults have unprecedented access to minors via internet forums, chat rooms and gaming. Children get phones and tablets earlier and earlier, and nearly all kids play such social games.

Twenty-first century pedophiles aren’t hanging around school gates with candy: they’re lurking online, like Sarah Nyberg. And parents are in some cases decades behind the times when it comes to protecting their little ones.

Funny, the only place that seems like a pedophile haven is the alt-right given their 4chan homebase and what that tends to entail.

–- Update From New Post Merge ---

@SuburbanErrorist:

Actually was based off a Fox news story the night before which apparently got debunked.

So you're saying the president of the United States of America is a huge fucking idiot who just parrots news stories from his couch instead of using the millions of classified sources and other high level information access at his disposal. Wow, what an incompetent pile of shit.

–- Update From New Post Merge ---

YEAH WOW GUYS, HOW ABOUT THAT PEDO POSITIVE LEFT WING, THAT I ASSUME IS OUT THERE SOMEWHERE

Now don't mind me, I'm going back to /pol/ where people just so happened to have a thousand avatars of underage anime girls

Strooger

@Monkey:

So you're saying the president of the United States of America is a huge fucking idiot who just parrots news stories from his couch instead of using the millions of classified sources and other high level information access at his disposal. Wow, what an incompetent pile of shit.

Can you imagine the collective republican outrage if Obama had used a factually inaccurate news report as a source in his speech for whatever reason?

killerbee1000

@Kaiolino:

Alex Jones is "apparently taking on a new role as occasional information source and validator for the president of the United States"

We are truly living in an age of idiocracy.

Monkey King

Eagerly awaiting SuburbanErrorist winding up banned after starting up the ol' "Actually it's called ephebophilia not pedophilia. Milo is NOT a pedo!".

Green_vs_Red

@MetaMario:

It's been one month. One. Month.

Trump's been lying, stepping on toes, & bullshiting for a far much longer period of time.

Shirohige_AC

@loneassassin:

Milo attacked a female video game journalist by not only putting out photos of a sexual nature when she was 15 to defame her when she was debating him during Gamergate. And when that didn't work he went after her family including posting photos of dead relatives online to mock her.

Care to share any links? Google gave me only this http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/04/20/anita-sarkeesian-debate-me-and-i-will-donate-10000-to-feminist-frequency-or-a-charity-of-your-choice/

Femme

@Kaiolino:

Alex Jones is "apparently taking on a new role as occasional information source and validator for the president of the United States"

You have to be fucking kidding me.

Rogues' Gallery

@Femme:

You have to be fucking kidding me.

Kaiolino

onemoment

This thread is now dominated by Milo Y and Alex Jones. I just punched the closest thing next to me when I not only remember Alex exists, but that he's backing Trumps asinine quotes as well. The two of them combined surely is too much, and will poison us all.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-un-churkin-idUSKBN15Z1UU

Also, a Russian U.N Envoy died of a heart attack. This is somehow Trump's fault.

Femme

Just when I think I can't be any more shocked over Trump's decisions, the bastard always proves me wrong. By the end of his presidency I bet we'll have seen him taking candy from babies and kicking puppies.

KageKageKing

@Rogues':

wolfwood

https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/what-do-europeans-think-about-Muslim-Immigration

Just in case anyone thought us Euro's wouldn't consider falling for a Trump line.

Monkey King

@wolfwood:

https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/what-do-europeans-think-about-Muslim-Immigration

Just in case anyone thought us Euro's wouldn't consider falling for a Trump line.

That's worse even than the Trump ban lol, like its not "countries with terrorism problems or wars", its "mainly Muslim".

Gotta keep out all those dangerous Indonesians, Kazakhs, and Albanians.

onemoment

Hey, Trump found another NSA dude.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/20/donald-trump-hr-mcmaster-michael-flynn-national-security-adviser/98165152/

However, this comes with terrible news. This thread is now Milo Y X Alex Jones X John Bolton.

The president also suggested that another finalist for the national security adviser's job, former U.N. ambassador John Bolton, would eventually be hired for a different position.

wolfwood

Albania has way too much of a mob image attached to it to ever register as muslim.

I mean stereotypically speaking.

Green_vs_Red

@Femme:

Just when I think I can't be any more shocked over Trump's decisions, the bastard always proves me wrong. By the end of his presidency I bet we'll have seen him taking candy from babies and kicking puppies.

Why do that when you can sue them for defaming you?

SuburbanErrorist

@Monkey:

Eagerly awaiting SuburbanErrorist winding up banned after starting up the ol' "Actually it's called ephebophilia not pedophilia. Milo is NOT a pedo!".

Neither do I or Milo support the ol' "Bullshit" buddy.

And for your ref:

The British author says he (Milo) spoke of his own relationship when he was 17 with a man who was 29. The age of consent in the U.K. is 16.

sgamer82

@SuburbanErrorist:

Neither do I or Milo support the ol' "Bullshit" buddy.

And for your ref:

The British author says he (Milo) spoke of his own relationship when he was 17 with a man who was 29. The age of consent in the U.K. is 16.

Even if it wasn't strictly illegal, a 29/17 age split can't be considered kosher, even in the UK. Were it a 29 year old man and 17 year old girl, I can't help thinking there would be Words.

SuburbanErrorist

@sgamer82:

Even if it wasn't strictly illegal, a 29/17 age split can't be considered kosher, even in the UK. Were it a 29 year old man and 17 year old girl, I can't help thinking there would be Words.

Milo was strictly talking about homosexuals.

But I assume his stance would be like I assume people would be a bit worried if a 29 year old man was with a 17 year old girl and think it's borderline. But by UK standards she's a consensual adult, if she doesn't mind it and isn't being forced it's her decision and she has the right to do so what she likes.

Femme

So did those interviews posted earlier just never happen or what? He was being controlled by lizard people?

loneassassin

@Femme:

So did those interviews posted earlier just never happen or what? He was being controlled by lizard people?

Nah George Soros paid some editor to make Milo look bad.

sgamer82

@SuburbanErrorist:

Milo was strictly talking about homosexuals.

Not really my point. My thought is that there'd probably be some outrage regardless, and it'd probably be even greater if the younger half is a girl, even if she is legally above the age of consent.

@wolfwood:

Why on earth would anyone consider it to be less squicky if it was a gay relationship?

It's still a grown ass man going after a 16 year old.

That sounds more like where I was going.

wolfwood

Why on earth would anyone consider it to be less squicky if it was a gay relationship?

It's still a grown ass man going after a 16 year old.

Femme

@loneassassin:

Nah George Soros paid some editor to make Milo look bad.

I didn't realize editors had the power to make someone look bad by posting an uninterrupted video interview of someone speaking at length about pedophilia. Truly remarkable.

SuburbanErrorist

@sgamer82:

Not really my point. My thought is that there'd probably be some outrage regardless, and it'd probably be even greater if the younger half is a girl, even if she is legally above the age of consent.

Where are the feminists on that? Why should there be an issue if it's a woman on the other end? Equality?

Just reminded me of this.

!

–- Update From New Post Merge ---

@Femme:

I didn't realize editors had the power to make someone look bad by posting an uninterrupted video interview of someone speaking at length about pedophilia. Truly remarkable.

The argument earlier was :

@Femme:

Errr.. the following words came out of Milo's mouth:
How do you define "younger boys"?

Milo was purely talking about a completely consensual legal experience he had.

But you know, the supposed victim which would actually be Milo is actually the pedophile according to Monkey King. It's preposterous, illogical.

Monkey King

@SuburbanErrorist:

Neither do I or Milo support the ol' "Bullshit" buddy.

I like how you keep insisting its other people who don't get the discussion in question, while being apparently completely innocently naive of what pederasty is.

And for your ref:

For your ref.

Starting around 3:11.
Rogan says "14?"
Milo says "Something like that".
This is the actual video in discussion by the way, not whatever he's scrambling to claim now that people are paying attention to it.
Moreover it doesn't even matter because the controversy isn't actually about what happened to him, but that he was speaking positively of relationships with kids that age.
And no, "that age" is not 17 or even 16. He's talking around 14. And yes there is a MASSIVE difference.

–- Update From New Post Merge ---

@SuburbanErrorist:

Milo was strictly talking about homosexuals.

What the fuck does that matter?

Femme

^ This. All of it.

Ubiq

CPAC dropped him because of his video condoning pedophilia.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/milo-yiannopoulos-disinvited-from-cpac-amid-pedophilia-comments

Monkey King

@SuburbanErrorist:

Where are the feminists on that? Why should there be an issue if it's a woman on the other end? Equality?

The issue has nothing to do with gender, this is about adults and kids.

https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder749/300x/42458749.jpg

Get the fuck outta here lolll, there are frequently scandals involving older female teachers getting busted for relationships with students.
Someone I sort of went to school with (grade above me) was busted for having sex with a teenager she was tutoring, no one batted an eye….or actually she was fired and is going to jail for maybe 30 years! But ok, as always the made up internet bubble of sheltered manboys has lots of knowledge on how the world actually is out there.

You're talking about pedophilia too. The argument earlier was :

She's not saying its cool and healthy for young teens to have sexual relationships with older people though. You like leaving out key details.

Milo was purely talking about a completely consensual legal experience he had.

Something like 14 years old is not legal. And "consensual" doesn't exist below the legal line. Do you…actually not get the concept of how minors can't legally consent to sex? Because I'm increasingly getting this vibe.

But you know Milo is actually the pedophile according to Monkey King. It's preposterous, illogical.

Says person defending statements from video he hasn't watched.
Also fun fact: Lots of child abusers were themselves abused.

–- Update From New Post Merge ---

I work at schools SuburbanErrorist.
A seventeen year old is a near young adult, still plenty immature. But they resemble someone about to be given legal responsibility for themselves. They are generally physically mature enough to essentially be the same as a college student.

A fourteen year old is a child. They are stunted halfway developed teens still full of snotty middle school behavior and belong nowhere near a car, bills, or voting. They look nothing like an adult, and behave nothing like an adult.

An adult macking on a seventeen year old is a creep.
An adult macking on a fourteen year old is a pedophile.

Femme

You know what's the normal human response to ~~allegations~~ proof that someone you admire supports something that is absolutely wrong?

You would take a second and doubt that person's integrity, even if he or she has been saying and doing a world of good in recent memory. Of course Milo hasn't been doing a world of good and not even close, but it's absolutely insane that there exists people out there that can support someone so vile so vehemently that they'll refuse to doubt them, even for a second.

You know, it is possible to, for whatever strange reasons you have, keep being a fan of Milo but also back down and say "what Milo said in those videos was not normal and not acceptable."

SuburbanErrorist

@Monkey:

The issue has nothing to do with gender, this is about adults and kids.

Did you read at all? Below in which I responded to?

@sgamer82:

Even if it wasn't strictly illegal, a 29/17 age split can't be considered kosher, even in the UK. Were it a 29 year old man and 17 year old girl, I can't help thinking there would be Words.

–--

Get the fuck outta here lolll, there are frequently scandals involving older female teachers getting busted for relationships with students.
Someone I sort of went to school with (grade above me) was busted for having sex with a teenager she was tutoring, no one batted an eye….or actually she was fired and is going to jail for maybe 30 years! But ok, as always the made up internet bubble of sheltered manboys has lots of knowledge on how the world actually is out there.

Yea… because it's illegal. It has nothing to do with what I was talking about (U.K) non student, legal, consensual sexual activity.

She's not saying its cool and healthy for young teens to have sexual relationships with older people though. You like leaving out key details.

It would be all fine if it was exactly how you mentioned it "young teens to have sexual relationships with older people" which I believe in. However, she was purely mentioning that if it was a female on the younger side the reactions were different and that's the issue.

Something like 14 years old is not legal. And "consensual" doesn't exist below the legal line. Do you…actually not get the concept of how minors can't legally consent to sex? Because I'm increasingly getting this vibe.

Video has nothing to do with anyone else but Milo himself. The interviewer pulled out an age and Milo just ran along with it. Being his loose mouthed no restraints self, he played along with the number 14 making him look like he has no problem with a priest playing with 14 year old's doing that when actually he was 17.

Please… he was joking about himself being the predator.

I work at schools SuburbanErrorist.
A seventeen year old is a near young adult, still plenty immature. But they resemble someone about to be given legal responsibility for themselves. They are generally physically mature enough to essentially be the same as a college student.

Of course, and in US it's not legal at that age.

A fourteen year old is a child. They are stunted halfway developed teens still full of snotty middle school behavior and belong nowhere near a car, bills, or voting. They look nothing like an adult, and behave nothing like an adult.

I agree.

An adult macking on a seventeen year old is a creep.
An adult macking on a fourteen year old is a pedophile.

That's correct.

loneassassin

So Milo lost his book deal.

taboo

@SuburbanErrorist:

Where are the feminists on that? Why should there be an issue if it's a woman on the other end? Equality?

i think you'll find that feminists will condemn it. Usually its dudes that are like "nice!" in my experience

Kaiolino

SuburbanErrorist

@Femme:

You know what's the normal human response to ~~allegations~~ proof that someone you admire supports something that is absolutely wrong?

You would take a second and doubt that person's integrity, even if he or she has been saying and doing a world of good in recent memory. Of course Milo hasn't been doing a world of good and not even close, but it's absolutely insane that there exists people out there that can support someone so vile so vehemently that they'll refuse to doubt them, even for a second.

You know, it is possible to, for whatever strange reasons you have, keep being a fan of Milo but also back down and say "what Milo said in those videos was not normal and not acceptable."

For me I have personally seen his stance on the whole thing and I know he is not pedophile and seen his disgust about it on live speeches. His story I saw was completely about himself and joking around which was recklessly stupid.

He does not advocate for pedophilia.

Hell he even got attacked by the pedo's because he undermined their virtuous intentions on just having a sexual orientation

Todd Nickerson at Salon.com follows up his essay on pedophile sympathy by attacking his critics–singling out Breitbart News’ John Sexton, who, along with Milo Yiannopoulos, undermined Nickerson’s claim of being a “virtuous” person trapped within a sexual orientation inexorably linked to an unbearable social stigma.

loneassassin

@taboo:

i think you'll find that feminists will condemn it. Usually its dudes that are like "nice!" in my experience

Hell South Park did an entire episode about the double standard behind this. So I don't know where the hell that guy is coming from.

SuburbanErrorist

Well this is his full response, I just read it:
[](http://Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/19/milo-angrily-denies-defending-sex-abuse-a-vile-and-disgusting-crime/#ixzz4ZGjZdcGv) [Milo Angrily Denies Defending Sex Abuse: ‘A Vile And Disgusting Crime’](http://Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/19/milo-angrily-denies-defending-sex-abuse-a-vile-and-disgusting-crime/#ixzz4ZGjZdcGv)

Femme

@SuburbanErrorist:

For me I have personally seen his stance on the whole thing and I know he is not pedophile and seen his disgust about it on live speeches. His story I saw was completely about himself and joking around which was recklessly stupid.

He does not advocate for pedophilia.

Hell he even got attacked by the pedo's because he undermined their virtuous intentions on just having a sexual orientation

Todd Nickerson at Salon.com follows up his essay on pedophile sympathy by attacking his critics–singling out Breitbart News’ John Sexton, who, along with Milo Yiannopoulos, undermined Nickerson’s claim of being a “virtuous” person trapped within a sexual orientation inexorably linked to an unbearable social stigma.

It does not matter if you think you know someone's stance on something. Surprise surprise, people can keep things hidden or lie for a long time about controversial issues. You should be using your head right now and second guessing him like.. even a little bit? :/

If there was word tomorrow that some person I deeply admired and supported had some dirt exposed, I sure as hell wouldn't outright deny it.

Monkey King

@SuburbanErrorist:

Yea… because it's illegal. It has nothing to do with what I was talking about (U.K) non student, legal, consensual sexual activity.

In Connecticut the age of consent is also 16, as is the case in a ton of states. This is a non-difference. It being in England could not possibly be more irrelevant.
Also completely irrelevant: The relationship being non-student.

Not relevant to someone below the age of 16: Consent.
Relevant to someone below the age of 16: It being illegal as heck.

It would be all fine if it was exactly how you mentioned it "young teens to have sexual relationships with older people" which I believe in.

Wait….you believe in what??

However, she was purely mentioning that if it was a female on the younger side the reactions were different and that's the issue.

Femme and sgamer82 are not the same person.

Video has nothing to do with anyone else but Milo himself. The interviewer pulled out an age and Milo just ran along with it.

Yes, an underage age. That Milo ran with.

Being his loose mouthed no restraints self,

A lack of restraints and loose mouth imply that he told the truth. Do you even realize what you're saying?

he played along with the number 14 making him look like he has no problem with a priest playing with 14 year old's doing that when actually he was 17.

Even in this best case scenario you are confirming the main issue that everyone is taking with him. Him having no problem with a pedophiliac relationship, and talking it up as such.
So you basically just conceded the entire argument right here. You are agreeing the reason that CPAC is dropping him, and he is getting shit over, is real.

Please… he was joking about himself being the predator.

Hmm, naw. I'm actually not going to believe this because I have no reason to. The pock-marked crowd of alt-righters who thrive on being able to cowardly rely on "ITS JUST A PRANK BRO" whenever they get shit over saying something awful can go fuck themselves. Exactly how long do you think people are going to keep buying this shitty excuse?
You do realize the actual enjoyment of those prank youtubes is watching obnoxious morons get beat up for annoying people, and not the prank right?

Of course, and in US it's not legal at that age.

Well over half of the states in the US have 16 as age of consent. Including mine.

That's correct.

Then Milo is talking well of pedophilia.

taboo

@loneassassin:

Hell South Park did an entire episode about the double standard behind this. So I don't know where the hell that guy is coming from.

yeah when someone says "where are the feminists" on a particular issue i generally assume they have no idea about feminism or gender theory