@sgamer82:
Do we want to understand Milo? Because the impression I have of him, both from here and my other political board, suggests"no".
He is being incorrectly portrayed.
https://www.google.com.au/amp/www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/21/heres-why-the-progressive-left-keeps-sticking-up-for-pedophiles/amp/?client=ms-android-samsung
This is his stance on it, fighting against the soon coming up "Pedophile" movement.
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
@benjamminbrown:
I haven't said a word about the guy. You don't understand anything, I'm afraid.
Then don't go talking crap about me. You have no idea.
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
Milo:
Horrifyingly, there are signs of a new pedophile acceptance movement forming on the Left. Just as Allen West warned, the gay rights movement is being used as a template. First comes the argument that pedophiles are just “born that way,” absolving them of any moral responsibility for their desires. Then comes the argument that pedophiles are just normal people, like the rest of us, but somehow impoverished or victimised by their own condition.
Inevitably, our society’s current ostracisation of pedophiles will be portrayed as an injustice: an oppression from which pedophiles must be liberated, or for which they deserve our sympathy. And woe to the oppressors! Quietly, in progressive columns and academies around the world, progressives are losing their footing and sliding down that slippery slope. Publications like Salon are abetting the turpitude.
It is particularly crucial to protect children from pedophiles in the age of the internet, when adults have unprecedented access to minors via internet forums, chat rooms and gaming. Children get phones and tablets earlier and earlier, and nearly all kids play such social games.
Twenty-first century pedophiles aren’t hanging around school gates with candy: they’re lurking online, like Sarah Nyberg. And parents are in some cases decades behind the times when it comes to protecting their little ones.