@zeltrax225 said in Palworld:
I don't even know where to start at the sheer idiocy of this.
I'm getting way too old for this and the creeping thought if this is where we are all headed bugs me so I'll try not to think about it anymore and enjoy the little things in life.
I have similar thoughts, and it's wild to see so many people come out to argue like:
- "it's moral to steal from a bad company"
- "it's not plagiarism because it's not 1:1"
- "pokemon didn't create the concept of [animal]"
- "there's 1000 pokemon, you're bound to overlap"
- "nintendo/pokemon fanboy bootlicker lmao"
A lot of the same parroting in different spaces. Did they skip school where they teach you that can't just change some words of an essay and call it yours
This recent video covers this kind of topic too.
I wondered if some of it was also boiling down to whether someone needed to have any artistic bone in their body to understand that you can't stumble into a lot of the same design choices and pretend there wasn't tracing involved.
Do you guys remember when this was a thing?
As a side, one thing I haven't seen in the discussion about the Primarina/Azurobe hair coincidentally having the exact same wisps and bumps is that I think it also coincidentally takes from a shiny Suicune:
(ribbons and dark blue light body palette)
(head and nose shape)