Its the internet. I don't take it that seriously, if I did. I wouldn't have no have life.
Shit looks like Daredevil is in development hell.
I'm sad:sad:
Oh Yeah to all those folks that say Riami was forced to put Venom in Spider-man 3
Immediately after Spider-Man 2 (2004) released, Ivan Raimi wrote a plot for the third film in two months. According to Sam Raimi, the film initially dealt with the concept of heroes with a dark side, and villains with a sympathetic side. As well as dealing with the "triangle" between Peter, Mary Jane and Harry, the Sandman was made the film's official "villain"; the screenwriters made his character, merely a petty criminal in the comics, the real killer of Ben Parker to further Peter's guilt over his uncle's death. Raimi wanted another villain in the film, and eventually settled on the popular villain Venom to please the fans. There was also the addition of a rival love interest, Gwen Stacy, to complicate personal matters. However, with all these additions, the story became so complex that Alvin Sargent considered cutting it into two films, before realizing he could not create a successful intermediate climax for the third film to lead into the fourth.
Riami also wanted to have three villains in the first Spider-man film as well so this means Spiderman 3 would have sucked with or without Venom like Robby said, he was right. Raimi, like Burton/Schumacher made the mistake of using villains for the sake of villains without properly balancing them The reason why the second film isn't bashed is because Raimi had a less control and listened to Chabon about too many villains and trying to sell toys. Chabon remarked about this in a video.
Its Return of the Jedi all over again.
