@The:
So I finally decided to look a bit more into the whole Benghazi controversy that so many people are up in arms about by reading various sources on the matter. So if I got everything correct the deal is back in 2012 an attack happened where 4 Americans were killed at the time Hillary was still Secretary of State. Two things were that she had a private email account that may have had confidential emails in them that could've been easily hacked into because of the lack of firewalls or something, and the second being that there was talks about increasing security at the place the attack happened but Hillary decided not to increase security. For the first account there is no proof of the confidential information being leaked or sent on that email. Supposing there was confidential information there's no way to know that it had any effect on that attack.
As for the second part just seems like something that may not have made a difference at best, and at worst was a mistake. I would assume for where it was there would be heavy discussion and not a light decision. Then something happened that they didn't expect and those people died. Unless I'm missing something I don't see how you can make something like this such a big deal. because it wasn't like she did something to actually cause the attack to happen, or did anything severely illegal. If this is something that's supposed to be terrible, then by definition almost all politicians would be at least in the same boat. So is there something I'm missing, or is it just a nontroversy made to try and stop Hillary because they have nothing else to go off of?
The committees were pretty much a publicity stunt that Republicans threw to show that Clinton/Obama cared more about elections then saving four American citizens. This is evident in the fact that she was aware of the Benghazi attack, but out of (incompetence?…) Clinton refused to act. What Republicans failed to understand is that people no longer care about ( incompetence / political scheming at the cost of lives )
Not going to get in the argument, because I lack the historical knowledge and other stuff to really get in depth. All I will say is people are assuming that because your posts are coming off pretty hostile. You also go into pretty Black and White territory where things are not nearly as simple as you might think it is.
Don't be bashful, everyone just googles their knowledge anyways.