@Monkey:
Experience.
Oh? In what exactly? You can tell that the person is lying by the way letters in sentence are written or something?
Because otherwise it's a baseless conjecture, and you just made an idiot out of yourself.
@Monkey:
Oh ok, which pampered first world country other than the US are you coming from, because this changes nothing.
I'm pretty sure Poland counts as a seconds world country.
And I know more about lack of freedom and dictatertoship more than you do, living in the US, which been busy bombing third world countries in the 60 years or so, and never was properly invaded.
@Monkey:
Wow, this guy here really knows his Machiavelli.
Yes. I do. And you are an idiot.
Political threaties of Machiavelli don't have anything to do with business. Because they were written in XV/XVI century, and deal mostly with political problems. Other then occasional added morality reference.
@Monkey:
You aren't doing shit to turn wherever you live into a dictatorship.
Baseless conjecture, meant to make me more angry? You were hyped as good debator, Monkey King, don't ruin your first impression like that.
@Monkey:
Isn't actually a logical fallacy.
Your argument was literally "I don't care what someone does, just as long as they follow their convictions :)"
So once again, Adolf Hitler.
If you can actually have an argument taken down by someone mentioning Hitler than you've constructed a really terrible argument.
What you're doing here is complaining that someone drove a mach truck through your defenses.
Nah, just couldn't help myself of trying to see if you fall for it.
And Hitler, if you actually read more history books than what your teacher told you in middle school, you would learn that Hitler was anything but a man sticking to his convictions. He gave contradicting orders, freqeuntly changed his mind, in both little and big matters, and was basically a mess when it comes to totalitarian leadership.
He was following his convictions about as much as goldfish does.
@Monkey:
lollll, that was Onigumo, a guy who clearly works by Akainu logic. Man I didn't imagine this ironic turn of events.
So you are saying that he would've blown the ship regardless of arriving at Enies Lobby and Buster Call orders? If Buster Call never left Marineford, I guess he would be like: "Damn, I really wanted to kill someone! You, over there! Blow up that ship! NOW!"
And the word of the day, kids, is CONSEQUENTIALISM.
@Monkey:
In that you're a juvenile wannabe sociopath who would be terrified to live in actual police state? I suppose so.
… You have no idea what being a sociopath enteils, don't you? Because if you did, you would never use that term in the context which I presented.
@Monkey:
By "the series end" do you mean "when I grow up"?
So you assume that my beliefs are inherently flaved, and as such I must be a child and somehow "Grow up". Really, I'm defenceless in front of such an argument.
Mostly because it isn't argument at all, and you are just incapable of comprehending that people can have other beliefs than you. Out the two of us, I think it's you who need to mature more.
@Cyan:
The common marines were almost certainly there to be used solely as cannon fodder to somewhat slow Whitebeard down. Fuck, I'd desert too.
Yeah. Like Coby, Helmeppo, and all that other Marines that never faced Whitebeard.
Why people assume that the only enemy fodder marines can attack is Whitebeard, when that's clearly not the case, as shown multiple time?