@JaxSazz:

I don't think you're really explaining it correctly.
But that's not what I wanna say. I think it's pointless to argue about this topic since it's a very heated and politicized debate nowadays and a lot of people simply REFUSE to conceive that women would be on average even SLIGHTLY more submissive.
For exemple, many "politically correct" people will admit that basic sociology hints at males being usually more aggressive but will refuse the very idea that women seek dominant partners because dominance is generally seen as negative and oppressive. Even if sociologic studies tend to demonstrate it. And that's because sociology isn't the most solid of sciences. Anyone can twist sociologic facts or at least claims. Nowadays, claims about women are the most likely to be met with hostility.
I'm not saying it's the case with King Cannon, but this kind of debate is often fruitless on the internet.
Feel free to try, though, it can be interesting if you can succesfully back up your claims.

I know it's stupid. I know I shouldn't even bother.

But it's so simple that I won't back down. People need to get their heads out of the god damn clouds.

Women seek dominant men because a penis is being rammed into them repeatedly. Sex, in reality, is violent.

@allbluebro:

My point was the cracks kind of lead me to believe it was Machvise to knock Franky out. I realize it wasn't even close to only Machvise fighting Franky but the whole idea that it seems like Machvise can muster up the strength to knock out our Franky shows a he at least has some offensive power. I don't even know why I am defending that swirly tailed Hulk.

Duder, there aren't any cracks in the floor.

Dancing around reality doesn't change it.

Could Randa Rousey defeat T.J Dillashaw?

The answer is a resounding no.

In fact, they aren't even allowed to fight.

If women and men are physically equal then why are women and men's events separated?

Look up track and field scores and records, compare the differences between men and women.

This whole thing is fucking stupid. You ask for proof, it's all there. Now what?

@King:

Again, where's the "biological" proof?

Try not eating or drinking for a solid 3 days.

Proof.

Biology controls us far more than intellectual and moral factors ever could.

@King:

Oh, so suddenly you're a biological expert? I'm totally believing an Internet guy about that.

Biologically, all women share the same mentality. What is this based on?

Really, if you're going to say women are supposed to be dominated in life is pretty much claiming that they shouldn't be treated equally, as if Biology controlled the way we do stuff or something.

LOL biology controls nearly everything we do.

….do you need me to explain the birds and the bees?

--- Update From New Post Merge ---

@JaxSazz:

This is highly politically incorrect and I find it offensive. You pig ! :ninja:

Thats me, shocking the people back into the world.

^^ bro just got owned.

@King:

Nice stereotyping there.

Because really, all women are the same, despite being human, which are complex beings where different individuals have different thoughts.

Honestly…do you know how sex works?

All my points are based purely on biological hardware.

What I find hilarious is women with power (i.e. sexy women) don't give a flying fuck about all that equality bullshit. Sometimes nature is too powerful a force for us to overcome and pretend it doesn't exist.

Women's role in sex and in life is to be dominated, and they love it. They pretend they don't, but that's why time and time again, powerful women choose powerful dominant men as their partner.

That's not to say women are inferior, that women aren't human, and men are better than women. Both men and women are human beings. It's just simply biologically why we get in the position we're in.

There are some things that men are simply better at than women and vice-versa. But in this case specifically (fighting) men are indeed significantly more well adapted to success than women. Men are on a whole larger, they have greater spacial awareness, faster reflexes, more durable frames, thicker bones, and thousands of years of biological practice hunting. OF COURSE they're going to be superior in physical combat. Not that physical combat matters in real life, because it's just plain stupid. But why are we complaining about things that are?

People that are saying that Sanji is going to go all out against Big Mam and Pekoms and Tomago, consider this:

After Luffy defeats Doflamingo, is anything Sanji does going to be all that impressive?

Surely Sanji won't show us more power than Luffy's going to demonstrate?

I think Sanji is going to run away after doing something clever to damage Big Mam's ship.

@Razh:

Instead, Oda responded at the end of Jaya arc, when he showed BB and his crew.

I swear, this "they" thing has more lives than a cat.

There needs to be a thread of common misunderstandings in one piece. This scene would be right at the top.