@Demon:
Ssssssstill not answering any of my questions I see.
In case you haven't realized, I'm only one person and there's a ton of you posting. There's only so many hours in the day.
@Demon:
I'm still curious as to what exactly is wrong with discussing non white male representation in gaming.
There isn't anything wrong with it. :U
@Demon:
Why that makes one a "Social Justice Warrior", and why that's a bad thing…. GamerGaters tend to seem to think that....
Because the extremists have effectively dragged its name through the mud.
Inb4 "but not all SJWs are like that!!!": You can't apply "No true Scotsman" to SJWs and then just dismiss it for GG because you don't like them.
@Demon:
I keep quoting your posts so you get notifications about it….
notice you keep failing to respond. It's because you realize the answer DOES expose GamerGate's inherently misogynistic ways isn't it?
I just loooove passive aggression, don't you?
You can cover your ears, stick your head in the sand, and scream like a child 'til you're blue in the face, but it doesn't change the fact that GamerGate donated a ton of money to TYFC (self-proclaimed radical feminists!). It doesn't change the fact that GamerGate as a whole openly condemns doxxing and harassment of these women (seriously, even Quinn said thanks). And it sure doesn't change the fact that GamerGate goes after
.
Buuuuuuut I guess none of that matters. Misogyny is and always will be the reason behind what GamerGate does. Nothing else. Only misogyny. All the misogyny. Screw being decent human beings; MISOGYNY's where it's at.
(That was sarcasm, if you couldn't tell.)
(Also, 7/10. You actually managed to rustle my jimmies.)
@Purple:
You seem to be missing the point of what constitutes "journalism ethics" when the companies have a very clear line against purported "bullying" rather than your grievances against things that you actually care about
Hey, if companies want to stay neutral and out of this, more power to them.
@Purple:
Just means they need to clean up their tone and hey, if they care about those sponsors, they can get'em back
I'll believe it when I see it.
@Purple:
Does not correlate that anyone cared to go after them. IGN hasn't changed anything about their ethics policy and look! No one's going after them!
The Escapist was actually anti-GG for a little while.
And IGN's stayed out of the whole debacle beyond some random users' blogposts. We'll get to them when we get to them. ~(–~)
@Insider2000:
At what point did I say that what she did was okay? Where in that entire dialogue? Please. Pin point where I said that without deflecting into: "But other people are saying it's okay."
Tell me, where did I say that I completely expect you to fully support GamerGate since Zoe Quinn Did A Thing?
You assume this of me, I assume that of you. Hooray. We're even.
@taboo:
didnt they make a little blurb saying they were against corruption? Is that really all it takes??
And you know, fixing their ethics policy and standing by it.
If they did that in the beginning, none of this would've even happened. Buuuut they couldn't leave that cozy little nest they made, could they.
Although with all this slander and hatemongering, GG probably won't stop until these people are fired, or until the sites go belly-up; whichever happens first.
Ah well, C'est la vie. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
@taboo:
Dude it's literally shadow though lol
! http://www.gunnerkrigg.com/comics/00000971.jpg
I thought that too when I first read it. I drew this before I did, tho.
(Someone also thought this avvie was of someone from Blood Lad, so I guess this kind of design's been used a few times.)