I don't think so Bellamy. The theory is based on lots of things.
Cause Crocs a girls answers everything right?. How he knew about Plutons location, relationship with Whitebeard, why he wants to be Pirate King and so forth. People don't consider everything else just "uh, Ivankov said this so, he's a girl" why not delve deeper even at the risk of sounding weird. I'm not saying my theory is rock solid but I've yet to hear anything specific about it that is wrong. It's just speculation, that's what a theory is.
And my previous posts have less to do with my theory then with all the Bellamy's in this place.
Theories should be based on a basic hypothesis and backed up with evidence. Your theory develops from evidence, but isn't backed by any, much like many in AP. For instance:
1. That Crocodile was a member of the Revolutionary Army before becoming a pirate, the crux of your entire theory. This isn't supported by anything, and is instead pretty easily disproven.
a. Crocodile was inspired to become a pirate while watching Gol D Roger's execution. This is 22 years before the story now, and likely before the Revolutionary army even existed, at least to the capacity it does now because Dragon was 10 years or so off from being seen as a threat.
b. Crocodile was a New World pirate for the next 22 years, trying to become pirate king.
c. Iva would have mentioned that Croc was a revolutionary. It's hardly a "weakness" and he brought it up regarding everyone else who had been a revolutionary.
2. Some other things wrong with your theory.
- It doesn't actually explain why he wanted to become Pirate King, and only actually establishes him as a character after he's already hardened like today, and before he's hardened and a supposed revolutionary.
- Whitebeard and Crocodile do not in any way have a Zeff/Sanji relationship. Croc legitimately tried to kill Whitebeard; Sanji and Zeff are not like that at all. Their relationship is completely one of enemies. Croc wanted revenge on him. Where do you see similarities?
Your theory just isn't comprehensive on so many levels. It attempts to explain something, but in ways that come out of no where. I'm not even necessarily saying that all of this is completely wrong. That Croc doesn't have dealings with Revolutionaries, or that he wasn't helped by Whitebeard and decided to fight for your said reason, but you haven't given any reason to actually think about it as a rational explanation. You haven't really made a theory, just a guess.
Edit: One last thing; quit using the term Bellamy's. It's immature and getting annoying.