But we saw in Zoro's flashback that Mihawk considers a haki imbued blade essential. Why would he not obey his own teachings?
I don't remember him saying it has to be imbued at all times. And Buggy was unarmed. He certainly didn't have any metal weapon that should have made Mihawk fearful of chipping off the piece of #1 sword in the world. Wouldn't it be an overkill if Mihawk went with Hardening (which had yet to make it's first debut at the time) against flesh alone? Not to mention it would do the same it did to the frozen tsunami to everyone behind Buggy.
Even later on, when he tried to cut Luffy again, Daz Bones blocked it without getting hurt. Then he was cut. It could mean Haki wasn't on the entire time. Or that Daz Bones could use it up to a point. Doubt it, though.
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
Does it really? Could you just describe what happened in the pages where they clashed?
Like just a factual breakdown of what happend, without any add-ons, guesses or opinions.
I thought I covered it in the last dozen posts or so. Must I repeat all that crap again? It's not a complicated scene. Since Haki was just shyly peeking out at that time, there are no discernible signs of someone using it. Mihawk might have been using it the entire time, or just during Buggy slice, or he might not have been using it.
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
It's becoming pretty clear neither of sides will budge and I think everything that could have been covered was covered. Last I want to do is keep beating a dead horse until I get banned or something, like some other dudes in the past.
Better to just agree to disagree. :ninja: