Well an applicable example would be in war you were raiding an enemy base and shot at enemy soldiers and there happened to be civilians there, i.e. civilian casualties. Innocence would be judged on your knowledge of innocent people in the group, which I think for Franky he assumes they are all enemies.
They're basically female fodder for all anyone's concerned. They're probably weak, but they would try to defend Pink I'd imagine if push came to shove. Franky's fine with blasting them.
I dunno where that little lecture came from tbh.
Because the "Franky blasting them away is fine, but Pink ripping her bra off isn't" was a terrible argument that you were also supporting. They're basically the same as fodder from Franky's and the reader's perspective. We can't know whether crazy groupies would attack if push came to shove and Pink was in danger or cower, despite the fact attacking would be futile as they're, as said, fodder.
I've never said that Oda is above failure. I have problems with Oda's writing at certain points just like everyone else does.
I suppose I shouldn't have strawmanned the "Oda purist" thing just as others shouldn't strawman the "here come the feminists" thing. Apologies for that.
However, the hysteria people are going though because of Senor Pink taking a girls top off and then actively NOT treating her as an object is a bit much for my taste.
Because people finding something you have no issue with disgusting, uncomfortable, awkward, and/or disturbing is going into hysteria?
This incident with Senor Pink, however, is a complete overreaction from several posters in my estimation.
And the reactions to people's reactions to the Senor Pink incident have been overreactions on the part of several posters in my estimation.