It's also wrong to defend someone deliberately evading arrest and questioning for an alleged crime under shitty pretenses.
So literally reporting the facts in an unbiased manner is now wrong?
@Green_vs_Red:
If he stays at the Ecuadorian Embassy until 2020 the rape allegation will forever remain an allegation. And any supposed evidence will be moot, the ball's in Assange's court not mine.
…Why?
Why should that evidence be sealed forever at an arbitrary date?
@Monkey:
Great idea, now if only Assange would leave the Ecuadorian embassy and go to court in Sweden, you know, those places where evidence is brought up. Then maybe we could start seeing evidence presented and stuff like that.
OR that evidence could be brought to the media. The court of public opinion still reaches him.