@Drake:
A Zoan ability isnt active until the user activates it.
If Teach ate the cerberus fruit, its not like all three heads would constantly have to be active.
Why you keep dodging the question? Explain how they would know he has 3 heads or is a zoan user if he doesn't activate it?
Thats a valid excuse though?
Ive honestly not had time to read through chapters of One Piece, just so I could show some guy where I get the base of a statement I made.
Then why do you continually respond without said evidence? Just seems like your wasting txt arguing other shit since you can't support your own theory.
Is that the best you could do? Your like a little middleschooler, everytime I say something you disagree with, you personally insult me out of nowhere.
Stop whining and make a relevant response or should I expect another "whatver you say insert homosmileyface" reply to this post?
If you actually want to be taken seriously in the world,
Cut this lecture short dumbass.
you need to start accepting that other people have different opinions than you, and that when those opinions are different than yours you need to stop directly insulting someone.
This isn't about difference of opinion. This is you unable to stick to the topic at hand wasting more txt cuz you can't do something you previously accused me of; provide evidence. No surprise you're a hypocrite.
Sure, you can insult the theory or speculation all you want, just stop calling people dumbasses because your too arrogant to accept the fact other people have different opinions.
All these words and you couldn't even make a reply with a point that was on topic.
I DID NOT FUCKING MAKE THE CLAIM.
Yes you did dumbass:
@Drake:
theres plenty of "base" to the fact of Teach having multiple personalities, several people wouldnt believe it unless there was essentially some base too it.
You even called it a fact and went on to sound even more nonsensical by calling it far fetched.
I just presented my speculation, to support some of my other speculation.
So it has NO base. Thank you. Just admitted that you aren't supporting this theory with evidence but speculation.
I even said myself that it was just speculation, and it was my opinion and several other people's opinions that teach had multiple personalities.
No you didn't. You called it a fact. Just in case you forgot:
@Drake:
theres plenty of "base" to the fact of Teach having multiple personalities
Just that I dont have a few hours to spare to look up some of the chapters that base my speculation doesnt mean you need to go around c alling someone a dumbass because you dont like what they say.
Stop replying until you actually find some free time to find this evidence you claim is in the manga. I don't even know why you still say this after saying you're "supporting your speculation with speculation". SMH.
I could say the same about you : The burden of proof rests upon YOU and all those who make the same claim. I don't need to disprove anything that hasn't been presented.
You still don't get it. This is the stuff that makes anyone think you're a dumbass. I am not making the claim. YOU DID. I already proved you did. If you make a claim you're suppose to provide evidence to prove that it even has a chance of being right. I do not have to do your work for you.
Side note if you ever find your find yourself in a criminal court case as the defendant I strongly advise you don't represent yourself and pray you don't have to take the witness stand cuz after being laughed at you'll definitely be found guilty.
since you obviously have so much free time to call people dumbasses because you disagree with them, you might as well spend some of that time proving your statement.
I didn't make a statement you did. I'm asking you to support your claim. Instead of complaining of lack of free time, whining about name calling, and yet still finding time to respond to me when you could be finding this evidence of yours.
I can already tell you won't go looking for evidence(as if you could find any), you'll reply to this post with more complaints instead of doing what you keep saying you will eventually do, and probably find something else to waste txt on when you reply to me. Probably with a "w/e you say" i.e conceding from the argument.
Ill get around to looking up the chapters when I feel like it, okay?
Sure you will. You've spent how many posts telling me you would now? So much time to reply to me without evidence but no time to respond to me with evidence.
Do we really need to repeat you getting your ass owned in a debate?
Are you so dense that you don't even understand what you quoted? It's hilarious how you bring up this falsehood of me being owned in an argument now.
It's also funny cuz it's apparent you don't even know what happened in that last argument.
The fact that nobody saw it
NOBODY SAW IT. So it could've happened.
a character who has a better opinion than either of us and was actually there
I like how you say this as if it's true_._ Being there doesn't mean shit if they didn't see anything
Their speculation automatically trumps everybodys opinion on the matter.
No it doesn't. You're just saying this cuz you can't prove he didn't touch him.
So that character, who said that it seems like Newgate was untouched, makes Newgate being untouched a more plausible theory than him being touched.
Wasted more txt instead of trying to comprehend what I said in that quote or try to find the evidence for your theory.
Once again, directly insulting me? are you twelve?
The dumbassery displayed in that post deserved harsher words imo. I like how you ignore how you don't know the definition of "theory" and won't even acknowledge that a disagreement with/argument against a theory is not a theory itself.