@Mavado:
Missionaries, Jehovas Witnesses/Mormons knocking on your doors, the whole "Intelligent Design" movement, abortion clinic bombings, working to turn the US (and other places) into a theocracy, etc. etc. etc…
It is a very aggressive religion, even if it isn't always violent.
…..
Very good examples for your point! It also might help to ilustrate what I meant with "different approach", you are looking at the historical and current doings of certain christians and christian sects - from that perspective one can only agree with you.
For me those "sects" do not equal the core of christianity, looking for that you would have to go back to the teachings of the "founder" (who actually founded nothing) Jesus, that can be found in the new testament.
@Mavado:
The god of Jesus is supposed to be the same fucking god that's in the old testament… you can't just throw all of that out if you're going to call yourself a Christian (which I assume you do).
.......
the old testament goes with Jews, Muslims and Christians and there are some heavy contradictions between old and new testament. Old testament surely has its meaning, but I´d rather see it in its historical context. When in doubt I´d rather go with the new testament.
@Mavado:
…... Madmen seems like a good description for most of the "gods"/"prophets" out there
You´ve got a point with that, but spontanously I´d like to make two exceptions: above mentioned Jesus and even more so some guy commonly known as Buddha. (just my personal opinion).
back on topic:
I always believed that Bartholomew Bear would turn out a "christian/believer" in the meaning that you portrayed above - trying to enforce his rightous beliefs even if it means to kill the unenlightened ones.