@Vectorkov:
I meant what would have been a more moral resolution by the government?
Well, I would start off with taking away the poneglyps, and burying them in an active vulcano.
@Vectorkov:
Yes, I might… if my execution was being left to burn alive or bleed to death after getting a limb blown off by cannon fire if I wasn't lucky enough to be immediately killed by a direct hit. They didn't exactly do a good job of executing Clover.
Spend a week in empty room with nothing to do, and no option to get out, or to talk to someone.
A week. Then get back to me on that.
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
@RamistaR:
If you never try you will never know.
Tried one, and I would rather go with the other.
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
@madaxen:
Again completely wrong!
No, you can't. Because killing others is never a sacrifice it's murder.
A sacrifice always means that you have to give something of a high value to others with less or no value in exchange.
The motive of the WG is not peace or anything of a higher purpose for the people in the world, it's only to remain their (the Celestial Dragons') privileges and power.
They give a shit about others' lifes, they only care about themselves.
=> As long as the motivation is wrong there is no sacrifice.
I was being sarcastic, and pointing out natural hypocrisy for you people.
Also motivations of WG are largely unknown by this point.
@madaxen:
So what's the motivation of that "law"? Remain peace for the world or cover crime of a minority which profits even today of the privileges gained by that crime which was most probably also mass murder.
Is innocent really subjective here. I'd say no. They didn't build a weapon. They didn't publish the information they've found.
And most importantly not everbody of that island was part of the researches.
The WG blamed a whole country for the "crime" of a small group. That's definetely not "rightous".
Never said it was righteous. I said it was evil. Quite clearly, in fact.
What you guys can't comprehend is that one can choose evil over good in certain scenarios.
@madaxen:
Not it can't. NEVER!
You can create laws that cover your ideology or paradigm. But in the end it will always be wrong.
And a question for you:
Is judging others by a different (stricter / tougher) scale than yourself - something you would call "(absolute) justice"?
No, that I would call "Living". Or "Human Nature", if I felt especially morbid.
Or you can be a hypocrite, pretending to live by the values you drop at the first sign of convenience.
You know, the American Way.
Well, that's incorrect. I apoligise.
That can be applied to any first world country, actually.