Same thing. Gonna hide the extended text Zik.
[hide]@Zik:
So you felt like arguing/debating a possibility with me when that wasn't even my main focus?
Not at all. Since I liked Greg's theory and had once thought of it myself I became interested, when you replied I read it and decided to interact as well. Whether or not he meant to, he left open the possibility while you said that he acknowledged that douriki has nothing to do with Haki. I took that as you were putting words in his mouth he never really said, thus I corrected you by saying that at the least it has nothing known to do with it…but there are many possibilities. I am not arguing either way, simply leaving a door open when there is no reason to close it.
@Zik:
That's how you see it.
Apparently it is how Greg sees it too, because he did a much better job of explaining what I was trying to explain to you. I was just trying to help you understand what he was trying to say – since as you continue to prove, you didn't "see it" that way. Sorry for trying to help you understand something.
@Zik:
Well I'm gonna have to disagree with what you are saying. I still think it has no support and is baseless.
That's fine with me, as long as you don't spout it as fact or criticize me or anyone else for liking the theory. I gave you examples of why it isn't baseless – whether or not you choose to acknowledge it or not has little concern to me.
@Zik:
Fine. If Sentomaru's punches were anything like the impact/reject dial or rokuougan Luffy would've mentioned it and Oda would let us know it was a powerful attack.
But….Oda did. I just explained that. Oda doesn't need to have Luffy himself make the same thoughts every time something happens – that would be too blatant and obvious. Subtle hints are just that, subtle…hints. Having Luffy -- the only other person present -- make the thought about roukuougan makes sense. Having Sanji -- a spectator of the scene -- make a comment about Garp's fist makes sense, while being a little different. Having Chopper and Sentoumaru -- both spectator and perpetrator of the scene -- make individual comments makes sense, while again mixing it up a little bit. Oda went out of his way to have Sentoumaru comment that it wasn't a DF while in the middle of his buildup for Haki, and have Chopper freak out about it's effect at the same time. It is completely reasonable to take this information and theorize that it is potentially related.
@Zik:
That seems like bull shit to me, Lucci knows what his rokuougan can do and it was not the first time he used it when fighting Luffy. I disagree with the notion that he is knowledgeable of rokushiki and the secret 7th ability yet somehow doesn't realize he is using haki or aware of haki when he is doing it.
You are missing my point. Lucci stated it was a secret ability, and it is obviously something he already knew. Are you suggesting that when the One Piece world was created, someone magically explained how Haki worked, and that from then on it was passed down from Master to Apprentice?? No. People learn it, explore it, exploit it, and develop it just like any other art form. I am merely suggesting the possibility that what Lucci discovered or learned was a combination of rokushiki and Haki. A premature form, if you will, that he learned or developed and simply assumed it was because he was a superman and master of rokushiki. In the same way Luffy might develop and has used haki, Lucci could simply be using a combination of skills without knowing that he is in fact using some other mysterious art form to enhance his abilities. I agree that it is unlikely, but I am merely using a simply example I came up with to give an answer / alternative to your question: "It begs the question if he did know haki how come that's all he could do with it?"
@Zik:
Zoro using haki is just speculation. What happened with Luffy is what happened with Luffy. If it was similar in Lucci's situation the first time he used rokuougan he would've spoke on it or would've thought about(as in a thought bubble for the readers) the difference in power or the unusual occurrence after using it.
IMO, this is "bullshit". For starters, I made it clear that Zoro using Haki was just speculation by emphasizing the word "possibly" and "possible". The rest I think I explained enough in the previous quotes to apply to this as well. "What happened with Luffy is what happened with Luffy." What is that supposed to even mean??? That it was a fluke?? How can you even say that? You don't write the story you know, so it is hardly something you can use as an example. Not trying to be rude or anything here, but that was just too much.
@Zik:
IMO if Lucci used haki I think he would know even if it was his first time I'd go out on the limb that he is aware of the technique and something it can do.
I agree. Thing is though, Lucci already thinks too highly of himself and could very well have simply accounted the ability to his being so incredibly awesome at rokushiki that he unlocked the hidden potential himself…and thus doesn't even realize he is just imbuing his abilities with Haki or something of similar nature. Just tossing out ideas though, so please don't attack me like I am saying this is the ultimate truth.
@Zik:
Like I said before if you speculate that rokuougan uses haki you can speculate all of the rokushiki attacks use haki(save soru).
For the sake of discussion, "maybe it is". I already explained earlier that it might. Who knows. I would say no though, simply because none of them showed evidence to effecting Luffy in a special way. Granted that means little since we know barely anything about Haki, but like I said….who knows? I suggested examples of how it might be Haki, and if so…the same reasoning could be applied: they simply were using a hybrid form of Haki without knowing that there was more to Haki. Again, that is just a weak of the top of my head example of a possible explanation. Not saying it is or will become true, just trying to keep a door of discussion open for the time being rather than slamming it in peoples' faces and criticizing the idea.[/hide]
@Xai:
But what's the significance of Lucci use Haki?
Nothing major. It is just speculation that would have been answered. If you read through a story once by yourself you might understand the story completely, but if you read it with other people, discuss things, theorize, connect details together, and then read it again you might find there was a lot more information that you ever realized. This is somewhat the same in the sense that if we figure out when and where it was used we can respect the story even more for throwing subtle hints and suggestive thoughts or attacks here and there. In addition to this, it might help us get an idea of when and where Oda is hinting at something else in the future, by learning his patters and such. If all else fails though, it is just enjoyable to explore ideas and critically think about certain things.