@The:
Phase 6: By 313, therefore, there remained only two emperors: Constantine in the West and Licinius in the East. The Tetrarchic system was at an end, although it took until 324 for Constantine to finally defeat Licinius, reunite the two halves of the Roman Empire and declare himself sole Augustus.
Rome had so many civil wars that it's really erronous and misleading to refer to the varying sides as being different Romes in the political sense of the Eastern and Western empires that came later. Also you're confusing the hell out of Constantine founding a "second Rome". That's in the sense of a second Rome the city, not a second Rome the empire. It's in reference to Constantinople. He moved the capital, made a new one, a second Rome in that sense.
The political split happened later with Constantine's descendents, it got split between two sons of one emperor.
Phase 7: Constantine make the New Roman Empire (as you said Byzantium Empire) and blah blah blah
Completely incorrect stuff in here as I said.
And he makes the remainings of the old Empire (Italy and etc) protectorates of the new Empire
He made himself emperor of the whole Empire, which means….all the territory. The "old" stuff was more of the territory, not protectorates.
The old Romans never accept their defeat and hate the new empire
Roman wasn't an ethnicity, it was a nationality. Everyone was Roman who had basically joined into the imperial system, didn't matter where they were from. Having the people in the west feel unromaned by romans makes no sense at all. I have no idea where you're getting this idea.
Licinius was born in the Eastern territory too btw around the same place as Constantine (modern Serbia). This wasn't some geographic struggle, it was political with overtones of religious issues.
Actually they have only the Church as power and with Church's power (Crusades) they make the biggest problem
lol what the hell are you talking about.
Western Rome was destroyed more or less by 500 AD by Germanic tribes, they had no revenge to take on anybody. There were 700 years between that and the 4th Crusade, you have a hell of a lot of blank history in regards to your knowledge of Western Europe!
Western Rome and the Catholic Powers of 1200 AD have vague connections, but are absolutely not the same entity in any way. Their motives and cares would be completely different. They sure as fuck didn't care about Licinius losing to Constantine lol.
in the Empire until Ottomans take the chance (with little help of Church of old Empire) to finish the Byzantiun
Eastern Rome was fucked over by many different groups, it wasn't a conspiracy. Their formally charmed geography eventually turned against them, they got attacked by Bulgarians, Serbs, Arabs, Crusaders and finally the Turks. They ruled the profitable middle bridge between Europe and West Asia, which paid…and then eventually made them the target of everyone around them.