@Darkstorm:
They're english words that in various media only an idiot would use to confirm to the audience that they were idiots.
I see, makes sense. Thanks for the info.
@ AGOG
[hide]Before I start in depth counter argument, I just have to ask you a favor. Can you use headings when arguing with me? Not tags, headings like this
Moria Argument:
So and so…
Would help me a lot. Okay here goes.
What purpose will he do in the future, he lost his crew, future, and basically everything else.
The only way he would be useful to even bring back or show in the NW is if he joins up with BB, Doflamingo, some other pirate or something like that. As an individual, he's not going to do anything anymore.
His "crew" was comprised of Hogback, Absalom and Perona… All other were replaceable zombies... And they are all still alive and for all we know still loyal to him.
What has Moria's purpose been so far on the main plot line?? Except to introduce Kaidou, I can't think of any. As someone who wants to be PK, he still has to show his true purpose.
BB is probable towards being the final guy Luffy faces, prior to OP ending, you can already see that BB has to face Luffy around the end.
The problem is what happens after that, Luffy can easily have an ending concerning them heading into the sunset, or his death, or something else… It's totally not needed at all to do something about this.
Well this is all speculation per speculation… Lets just leave this be.
Once again, it's not important, this is mankind… You can't expect one of his talent to not know that. Cause he is well aware of things such as this.
They didn't enlarge the ship, they only added things to the ship, for instance, wings and such, which were balanced...
The ship is already big enough… just the doors that pose problem in the eyes of some individuals.
It's not like they created a whole new design and put in a new floor on top of the old one, they never did that.
In terms of Physics the extra weight should have been a factor… And as per your NASA argument, they wouldn't allow something like this to be done to their shuttles either.
For Perona: the problem isn't that she's childish and too irresponsible, she's responsible enough to perform duties for Moria for ten years and Hogback did in fact comment on her being reliable before she set off to her room after Nami, Usopp, and Chopper ran away after seeing Oars.
She asked Bearsy to keep quite just because it doesn't look cute, and this provided Nami, Usopp and Chopper an opportunity to escape. Well it doesn't really matter though since its not like the SH are the most responsible crew in the world just look at their Captain… I meant responsible more in the sense of trustworthy and willing to risk her life you address this below so I will just discuss this there.
Yes, I agree that she's CHILDISH as in personality, but that's not a problem. If you look at the current females, we have the mature woman (Robin) and the middle post-teenager woman (Nami), however, we are lacking the younger version of "womanhood" and then we can assume that due to Perona being very young and such, she can fill that void.
Well I didn't mean childish is a good sense, I meant as in irresponsible and again untrustworthy… so just wait for my counter...
Can any other shown character, minus Caimie, fill that void? No.
Marguerite??
So, her personality and characterization fits the group, since she's basically a female version of Chopper (she's not him, but she acts similar to him…) and we've lost our younger character since Vivi basically stayed behind.
She is nothing like Chopper!! She only fights when she thinks she has a shot at winning, otherwise, she just runs like crazy…
So, she's basically "acceptable" with her current personality and I feel that changing that and creating a new one will mirror that of Nami and Robin, unless it's similar to Perona.
Nope, I am still not convinced… She is more of a coward then Usopp and I don't think that as a plus point towards her...
Now, the life risking thing, which I planned to do today, is basically annoying to deal with since it's subjunctive.
Well I think I will be here if you changed your mind…
Here's some things to ponder:
and ponder I did…
Perona ten years ago, or more, joined Moria somewhere and such, why? She stayed with him for all those years and Moria has been involved in a lot of dangerous things, since he ran the entire TB and basically had to deal with things.
I don't know…
Perona, she risked her life against Kuma.
She fought with her under assumption that she will win, she basically thought Usopp was her only weakness…
Perona, she risked her life to help Zoro, she could be killed.
Again she knew he was vulnerable against her Ghosts, she didn't have anything to worry about.
Zoro has his weapons back, she could be dead.
Same as above…
Perona faced off against 4 SH members, she risked her life against them…
Same as above… She ran as soon as she realized she couldn't win.
Same thing with every person she fought since the beginning of TB, as the zombies commented.
Can't be sure about this one but I imagine its the same as above judging by her comment when Usopp emerged un-negative-a-tized after her ghost attack… (Something among the lines of "I never thought anyone could counter my ghosts")
She's DONE them, but it's subjunctive if you want to accept them like that. I don't see the fuss concerning it, it's not that big of a deal…
Okay
When Love Sickness was introduced, it was described as a virus. If you look up the word, it's impossible for "love" to create some disease since love is intangible. However, when you use the literal phrase, Love is able to "lead" towards that… But it's all in their heads, like an illusion. That one confirms that it isn't even serious. Furthermore, the thing that basically had happened which caused death was the refusal of eating, as the lady commented on. She did state "Hancock doesn't want to eat" and such, which suggests that this is all caused by Hancock's own irresponsibility and stupidity. Furthermore, Nyon survived it. Which leads to stating that it's all a figment of their imagination and couldn't even harm a fly.
So, it's subjunctive if you want to believe in that "virus" being fatal, because I refuse to accept something so obvious as "fatal" when it isn't.
I will get back to this is a while[/hide]