@Bloel:
I really have to disagree here, where as Luffy does have a bad reputation these are all based on innuendo and rumour where as with Bartolomeo we've seen in these few short chapters that for the most part he's a nasty piece of work. Look at his first appearance;
! http://img.batoto.net/comics/2013/04/17/o/read516ec69c2f2f8/img000002.png
He's behind something called the "skewered pirate barbeque broadcast" suggesting that he not only burnt pirates alive but that he also broadcast this to the world, this doesnt suggest someone who's misunderstood this suggests someone who is just as described a nutter.
That is the part I thought of that he could be as bad as Kidd IF its true that he was behind the broadcast. It could bad press that says he's responsible. That was the point of mentioning the time Water 7 thought Luffy was behind the attempt to kill Iceburg= its possible for a third party to put blame a great tragedy onto another person.
More importantly, the fact that it was broadcast suggests that it can't be something that the press/WG can distort to fit a particular narrative (like the incidents reported in the paper). After being booed he throws a stink bomb into the crowd yet another thing a particularly nasty person would do.
Bartolomeo's reputation for the most part seems to be based off real world events that people have seen with their own eyes eg. the skewered pirate barbeque broadcast. From what we've seen of him I think he's for the most part what they say.
Actaully it is psosblie to skewer a broadcast if all it showed was the event and didn't show Barto. Look again at the image, it says he bombard and set citizens ablaze and he was behind the distribution of the skewered pirate barbeque broadcast, it doesn't say he was in the broadcast. That could be true, he distributed that nasty piece of work or he could be misunderstood and was blamed for it
I am not denying the chance he could be a nasty piece of work - in fact I'm hoping for it since he's different than the other nutters (Kidd is just too serious) but I am not denying the there is a slim (and yes I do agree its very slim) chance he's not as bad as people think.
Over all, thanks for discussing it with me :wub: You've managed to get your point across without being rude or disregarding me. I appreciate a chance of a real discussion instead of a piss-fest some disagreements turn into