@Darth:
Now, if I was goverment agent bend on balance of force and not plunging the world into oblivion, I would say then: "But wait a minute. You were present at the scene. With three thousands of our elite soldiers, lead by not one, but two Vice Admirals. This incident was caused by one Shichibukai. Not only were you incapable of taking any actions against him, you also failed to apprehend him afterwards. You. One of the four strongest guys currently on our payroll. And you want us to start a conflict with not one but six such pirates simultenously? Yeah, nope."
I guess this is a hard pill to swallow, because the admirals so far are one of these ranks that are…untainted. Almost all One Piece fans will agree that the Admirals are the real deal, while vice admirals are often used as a punch line in these parts. Sure, Ao Kiji and Kizaru both have wacky character traits, but we really knew this about them from the beginning (literally the first scene with Ao Kiji established that) and it fits with the general tone of One Piece. Yes, Fuji has wacky things about him as well, the whole careless old man bit, but it's less funny if the situation is so dire that people are dying by the minute. We saw a child mourn their parents body surrounded by gun fire, clattering swords and burning buildings, that's not really the appropriate backdrop for wacky admirals (I guess if One Piece was supposed to be a dark comedy). I mean, when Ao Kiji spared the Straw Hats on a technicality, it still only lead to these people escaping, nobody died indirectly (at that very moment, since the straw hat surviving that encounter did set some things into motion that are catastrophic) because of your questionable reasoning, or a technicality, when Luffy challenged Ao Kiji mano e mano, establishing that he isn't some sort of honor-less scumbag.
Kizaru is more arguable, but even he more or less did what he was supposed to do and was influenced by forces not expected to hinder him. The Dark Knight is a believable hindrance and was well introduced to us, so the whole scenario played out neatly. Sabo in that way, is what Rayleigh was to Kizaru, but I've read that you have big problems with the way Oda choose him to stall Fuji. I don't really have a problem with that, since Ace was extremely strong as well for his age, no yonkou or admiral, but not too far away from it. I mean, when I imagine the aftermath of all this and Fuji is telling his version to his superiors, saying that the second highest ranked revolutionary, who just got considerably stronger with eating the fire logia fruit, that really doesn't seem outrageous. Of course, this opens up two questions to me; What would've been if Sabo never appeared, what would've been the excuse? Nobody expected to appear in this arc. And what about his subordinates? Is Marine Grunt number 76 going to be able to keep this story secret? Are all these men completely loyal to him? Maynard suggested taking out Doflamingo, is he going to never say anything about Fuji ordering to stay away from Doflas lackeys?
I mean, I get what Oda is trying to do, but the whole thing, this whole construct just feels flimsy
I'm mostly reserving judgement because I genuinely don't really know how this will all pan out, while with a lot of other segments, I at least have some sort of idea where it might go, comes with reading a series for several years, but this I don't know.
Let's assume he succeeds in getting rid of the Shichibukai, wouldn't that be honestly pretty great? These people continue to terrorize people even after being pardoned, outright going after goverment officials, Dofla turning marines into toys, Moria stealing shadows of the same guys, one actually staged a coup to acquire a doomsday weapon, all proven to be unreliable little shits. It also fits with Fujis character, since his good will towards people shines through that way, wanting to get rid of the whole philosophy of using untrustworthy privateers as means to an end.
I honestly blame this more on Oda making this weirder than it has to be, instead of Fuji. The character isn't ruined for me, but I admit I'm not a fan of how it's been written and presented to us. That actually describes my sentiment about Dressrosa as well, alright arc, a little too ambitious for me, better than Fishman Island and especially Punk Hazard, but still a little iffy.
Edit: It's not my argument, but I just saw Magis post and since you will read this, he meant the scene when Rebecca finally resolved herself to attack Diamante. He commented on her using a dull blade and beat her down with his belt mace. I don't have the page now, but it really gave of the impression of Diamante being much stronger than her.