AGOG is Napoleon, Ace not reviving is Russia, and I am Waterloo.
Next Crewmate Discussion (Vol. 4)
-
-
seriously. why would you want Perona aside from reaaaallly disgusting creepy selfish reasons?
At this point in the story don't you expect a fuckton better from Oda.
it is just creep shit isn't it.
-
A simple day on the Thousand Sunny, by means of Retardia's sig:
–----------------------------------------Sanji: Lunch!!!!!! [Narrator: however, as the crew ran towards the lunch room, the dining room, a problem formed; they met a fatal conflict…] Jinbei: Umphhh!!! Zoro: Jinbei, you're holding up the food… Damn it!!
Sanji: Eh, let Nami-swan, Robin-chawn, and Hancock-dono [for lack of anything…] through shitty fish!!
Jinbei: I'm sorry, Mugiwara Crew. It seems that by some mere chance that I have become "stuck" through this passageway…Chopper: looks like we'll have to go through the back way... Hancock: move it, Tanuki!!
Chopper is flying away…
I will make sure that this GIANT FISH doesn't impede the path of my beloved...an hour passes Nami: We should go around… Hancock: NOT YET!! MY BELOVED WILL NOT BE BLOCKED BY THIS!!
Luffy passes to the after life…
Jinbei is mortally stoned and all the rubble blocks the path into the dining room, furthermore, the food has gone cold.Another hour passes The strawhat crew dies of starvation, all because the FISHMAN and the CRAZY woman prevented lunch from happening, all but Brook. He now sits there crying that his new crew is gone too… THE END!!
What a tear jerker.
Maybe I should be a Perona supporter now?!
. . .
AGOG, you put up one hell of an annoying, yet good fight against Arlong Park forums.
But, seriously…
Stop this repeating non-sense. Stop those Godzilla posts. Stop... period.
-
I openly deathpacted the One Piece subforum on Ace's death, 140 people at least signed on and suffered humiliation after Akainu disembowelled Ace.
An agreement with a moderator had been forged to enforce the permanent expulsion of these denizens of filth, said moderator's execution service thread was redacted and destroyed by the cadre of bland nannying busybodies who make up the vast majority of the mod service on that forum.
A few posted porno and got themselves permed, one or two left, the vast majority are still there stewing in faeces.
A grave injustice. Not surprised given the forum but at least you won and got so many to take that bet.
If only there was an Akainu like person modding that sub forum. They'd all be perma-banned.
-
NarutoFan's Male Naruto Fan: "I don't read One Piece, because I think Naruto is the only manga I should read, because it's the greatest manga ever! >:3 but I like Ace, because he reminds me of Sasuke, because of his jutsu~! Tee Hee Hee~ <3"
Akainu-like NarutoFan Mod: "Huh? Who in the hell are you?!"
ban
-
Best mod ever. They should become the authority here though. Who cares about Naruto
-
Hancock has nothing at all to even "call" build up, she is as uniform as all the pathetic AL residents; doing the same crap. She needs to be killed, that's what I think.
Ehi, can I use this quote in the ap tournament as a pro Hancock campaign?
something like "a vote for HANCOCK is a vote against AGOG" ;-) -
Wow. Those Outer Space-sized post is mind blowing.
-
@JERK:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v340/Demescus/Loading-1-1.jpg
this first panel is just like you AGOG
-
wow reading some of agogs comments and he is so delusional.
twisting all events to fit into your twisted logic of perona being angelic.
if the pharoh treats and heals up an almost dead slave so that he can continue to work is that being compassionate? no, its totally selfish. Perona just fixed up zoro, so that she is no longer alone, it was for totally selfish reasons.
Compassion is not defined by a deed, but the reasons for doing the deed are what defines compassion. you can not mix the two up. Look at Vegeta and Goku. Goku wanted to beat Cell for compassionate reasons, while vegeta was all about selfish reason. he didn't care about the world, he just wanted to beat him for his own selfish pride. If vegeta beats cell, that does not make him compassionate.
-
if the pharoh treats and heals up an almost dead slave so that he can continue to work is that being compassionate? no, its totally selfish. Perona just fixed up zoro, so that she is no longer alone, it was for totally selfish reasons.
For selfish reasons perhaps, but she did still fix him up and he's sound and safe, so it's still a good deed, whether the motive is selfish or not… Besides, doing something to gain human company doesn't sound all that selfish to me.
Also, she eventually gave him his swords back. What did she have to gain from that?
-
For selfish reasons perhaps, but she did still fix him up and he's sound and safe, so it's still a good deed, whether the motive is selfish or not… Besides, doing something to gain human company doesn't sound all that selfish to me.
Also, she eventually gave him his swords back. What did she have to gain from that?
did she give them back? or did zoro get them back. there is a huge difference. from what i recall he woke up with no weapons. we later see him with weapons. nothing about how they are aquired.
and like i said you can't twist events or look at perspectives not there to argue your point. Aizen killed some espada. Should we be giving him a foot massage because he is now a good guy and the hero because he killed some bad guys. Should we a mobster a medal everytime he kills one of his own henchmen for not doing their job right.
I mean both killed bad people right? Perona saved Zoro for completely selfish reasons. the act of saving him doesn't merit her an award. its just like the act of killing a person doesn't merit those people i mentioned above an award.
Perona's whole character personality has been set up to be a spoiled little princess wannabe brat. she has shown this in many of her acts and deeds she has done. Now if that spoiled brat is lonely like perona is and the only person she finds is nearly dead, is she all of a sudden a saint for healing her up for the sole reason of not being lonely and wanting a servant.
-
did she give them back? or did zoro get them back. there is a huge difference. from what i recall he woke up with no weapons. we later see him with weapons. nothing about how they are aquired.
and like i said you can't twist events or look at perspectives not there to argue your point. Aizen killed some espada. Should we be giving him a foot massage because he is now a good guy and the hero because he killed some bad guys. Should we a mobster a medal everytime he kills one of his own henchmen for not doing their job right.
I mean both killed bad people right? Perona saved Zoro for completely selfish reasons. the act of saving him doesn't merit her an award. its just like the act of killing a person doesn't merit those people i mentioned above an award.
Perona's whole character personality has been set up to be a spoiled little princess wannabe brat. she has shown this in many of her acts and deeds she has done. Now if that spoiled brat is lonely like perona is and the only person she finds is nearly dead, is she all of a sudden a saint for healing her up for the sole reason of not being lonely and wanting a servant.
Only in the filler anime did she use him as a servant, and even there she showed remorse when he was about to leave. About the swords, Perona is still watching over Zoro when he's walking through the ruins. If she doesn't want him to have the swords, why not just send a negative hollow through him and take them back?
And about that Aizen point, killing and aiding are two completely different things. Nobody benefitted from Aizen killing the espada, because he's still their enemy, hence it only goes to show he doesn't care for anyone but himself. Perona healed Zoro because she didn't want to be alone, I can see that, but he still benefitted from it, now didn't he? She did go through a lot of trouble for the "selfish" purpose of not being alone, but to Zoro it's still a good deed.
Tell me what I twisted here.
-
For selfish reasons perhaps, but she did still fix him up and he's sound and safe, so it's still a good deed, whether the motive is selfish or not… Besides, doing something to gain human company doesn't sound all that selfish to me.
Also, she eventually gave him his swords back. What did she have to gain from that?
Not being brutally mauled by a pissed off Zoro?
-
Not being brutally mauled by a pissed off Zoro?
A negative hollow would've been plenty enough to solve that.
-
A negative hollow would've been plenty enough to solve that.
No it wouldn't. Luffy/Zoro/Sanji not being able to fight her in that situation was just a plot device used by Oda to match her up with Usopp. We just don't know the limits of her powers, thats all.
If this isn't the case, she is so overpowered she will put Chuck Norris to shame.
-
No it wouldn't. Luffy/Zoro/Sanji not being able to fight her in that situation was just a plot device used by Oda to match her up with Usopp. We just don't know the limits of her powers, thats all.
If this isn't the case, she is so overpowered she will put Chuck Norris to shame.
Now who's twisting the story? As far as we know, she is overpowered.
It is however true that we don't know the extent of her power, and if she's going to join, there will need to be some weakness. But having her be strong back then and just suddenly turn weak now without an explaination would be a lousy continuation error. The fundamentals of your argument here is based on something nobody knows a shit about.
-
If you're trying to debate against someone, using "Naruto" and/or "Bleach" shit as an example or comparison.
You automatically lose.
-
Now who's twisting the story? As far as we know, she is overpowered.
It is however true that we don't know the extent of her power, and if she's going to join, there will need to be some weakness. But having her be strong back then and just suddenly turn weak now without an explaination would be a lousy continuation error. The fundamentals of your argument here is based on something nobody knows a shit about.
So … Zoro can't defeat her because she doesn't have weaknesses... If she has to join, she needs a weakness... but this is a lousy continuation error... wait what?
Also, twisting what? We know so little about her that everything is just speculation, including her being overpowered. Being able to render Luffy and co useless for 5~10 minutes is hardly overpowered, if seen in perspective, which is what my argument is based on.
Anyone arguing for Perona joining is basing their arguments on shit nobody knows about . We are all just speculating here.
-
So … Zoro can't defeat her because she doesn't have weaknesses... If she has to join, she needs a weakness... but this is a lousy continuation error... wait what?
This is saying we don't know about any of those weaknesses, hence your argument is currently invalid. However, she will need a weakness in the future to join. Your saying she already has one just strengthens her case.
And the continuation error is about her being powerful when fighting in Thriller Bark, but according to you not being powerful anymore, without a confirmed source to back it up.
Also, twisting what? We know so little about her that everything is just speculation, including her being overpowered. Being able to render Luffy and co useless for 5~10 minutes is hardly overpowered, if seen in perspective, which is what my argument is based on.
Hollow!!
5 minutes pass
Hollow!!
5 minutes pass
Hollow!!
…
See where this is going?Anyone arguing for Perona joining is basing their arguments on shit nobody knows about . We are all just speculating here.
That depends on how you interpret things. I'm basing my speculations on her character development so far and how it could expand further in the future.
It's not just the Perona supporters that do this. Prediction is the fundamental of speculation. For any of the current candidates to join, unconfirmed events have to occur first.
-
This is saying we don't know about any of those weaknesses, hence your argument is currently invalid. However, she will need a weakness in the future to join. Your saying she already has one just strengthens her case.
And the continuation error is about her being powerful when fighting in Thriller Bark, but according to you not being powerful anymore, without a confirmed source to back it up.
Hollow!!
5 minutes pass
Hollow!!
5 minutes pass
Hollow!!
…
See where this is going?That depends on how you interpret things. I'm basing my speculations on her character development so far and how it could expand further in the future.
It's not just the Perona supporters that do this. Prediction is the fundamental of speculation. For any of the current candidates to join, unconfirmed events have to occur first.
See, this is getting retarded and diverging from the original point. (Seems to be the strategy of Perona supporters - confuse people with meaningless posts).
The point I was making is extremely simple. There are two scenarios:
1. She handed over the swords because Zoro could have kicked her ass otherwise, not because she suddenly turned into an angel.
2. If he couldn't kick her ass, she is way too overpowered to join anyways and she is going against her established personality.Personally, I think 1 is far far more likely than 2, thats all.
If you think this is wrong, give a proper counter-argument instead of making useless posts saying "My speculations are better than yours!!!!"
-
See, this is getting retarded and diverging from the original point. (Seems to be the strategy of Perona supporters - confuse people with meaningless posts).
Where did this come from? We're discussing Perona's actions towards Zoro, and that hasn't changed. What counts as meaningless in your opinion?
The point I was making is extremely simple. There are two scenarios:
1. She handed over the swords because Zoro could have kicked her ass otherwise, not because she suddenly turned into an angel.
2. If he couldn't kick her ass, she is way too overpowered to join anyways and she is going against her established personality.Personally, I think 1 is far far more likely than 2, thats all.
If you think this is wrong, give a proper counter-argument instead of making useless posts saying "My speculations are better than yours!!!!"
What do you think I've been doing all this time and when did I ever insinuate that my speculations are better than any others? What I wrote about your theory being factually unsupported still stands and there is a good backing for that: There has been nothing pointing towards Zoro forcing the swords from Perona, but we have clearly been shown on-screen that Perona can easily take him down. If anything, it's your posts that lack ground.
There could be a weakness that makes her less over-powered (in which case she could join), but there could also not be one (in which case she wouldn't join). Whichever it is, Zoro would have no means of knowing this presumed weakness, and hence could not threaten her to give him his swords.
There is nothing behind your saying my posts are baseless and lack arguments, as this is just repeating of what I've been saying all along.
-
@JERK:
The One Piece section over there is absolutely terrible.
I'd rather have AGOG then them anyday.And even our worst mods look liked gods next to the shit they pass into authority on NF.
meh, I like the battledome, it has good posters and this forum should have one.
You're completely right about the One Piece section.
-
Where did this come from? We're discussing Perona's actions towards Zoro, and that hasn't changed. What counts as meaningless in your opinion?
The fact that you continue to attack the factuality of my statements while I have made it clear that they are all just speculations and can't be anything else.
This whole argument started when I attacked your speculation (not fact, mind) - that Perona handed over the swords because of the goodness of her heart - by stating my own speculation - that she handed them over because she was threatened. Instead of discussing these speculations, you dismissed my speculation as lacking "facts" while not providing any "facts" for your own speculation. Why would we speculate if we had all the facts? You understand why this is meaningless, right?
If we only went by "facts" for everything, there wouldn't be a need for this huge, entertaining thread. We could just wait for more facts to come forward .
There is nothing behind your saying my posts are baseless and lack arguments, as this is just repeating of what I've been saying all along.
You have been repeating facts we all know. There were no arguments against my speculation except in this post (mentioning how Zoro doesn't know the weakness). What you should be doing is defending your own speculation and show to me(us?) the reasons why it has more probability of occurring than my own speculation.
There could be a weakness that makes her less over-powered (in which case she could join), but there could also not be one (in which case she wouldn't join). Whichever it is, Zoro would have no means of knowing this presumed weakness, and hence could not threaten her to give him his swords.
There are a number of ways Zoro could know her weakness. By fighting her and finding out eventually. Usopp telling him her weakness. Some other random event. Basically, there is a good possibility that Zoro finds out about her weakness. If he can't find out the weakness before succumbing to her, that is as good as saying she is way overpowered - because a weakness which is that hard to discover is as good as no weakness at all.
-
Perona can't take any of the strong characters down you dumbshit, half the negativity was gag.
If you think an easily dodgable attack, a temporary delay of no permanent effect, can only be beaten in the entire OP verse by Usopp.Then you need to stop whining like the bitch you are Herr Sebe, because this is why we make fun of you, this is also why you couldn't reason yourself out of a paper bag.
And this is why AGOG will be IP banned and you will never be able to post here again without merciless laughter drowning you out.
-
The fact that you continue to attack the factuality of my statements while I have made it clear that they are all just speculations and can't be anything else.
This whole argument started when I attacked your speculation (not fact, mind) - that Perona handed over the swords because of the goodness of her heart - by stating my own speculation - that she handed them over because she was threatened. Instead of discussing these speculations, you dismissed my speculation as lacking "facts" while not providing any "facts" for your own speculation. Why would we speculate if we had all the facts? You understand why this is meaningless, right?
If we only went by "facts" for everything, there wouldn't be a need for this huge, entertaining thread. We could just wait for more facts to come forward .
Even speculation needs backup if you want credibility. If we can just blurt out whatever we want, all we can achieve is a bunch of yes-or-no-arguments.
You have been repeating facts we all know. There were no arguments against my speculation except in this post (mentioning how Zoro doesn't know the weakness). What you should be doing is defending your own speculation and show to me(us?) the reasons why it has more probability of occurring than my own speculation.
I can admit after having read my posts that they were a bit confusing, but there were interpretable arguments in there as well. I'll repeat once again, we have seen Perona take down Zoro in the past, but we have never seen her threatened by him. That's a counter-argument, is it not, even if you don't agree with it.
There are a number of ways Zoro could know her weakness. By fighting her and finding out eventually. Usopp telling him her weakness. Some other random event. Basically, there is a good possibility that Zoro finds out about her weakness. If he can't find out the weakness before succumbing to her, that is as good as saying she is way overpowered - because a weakness which is that hard to discover is as good as no weakness at all.
See, now you're taking it out there. I can't counter-argue this, because it's pure speculation without anything to back it up. As far as we know, Perona is overpowered, and so was Crocodile back in his days until Luffy discovered his weakness. But suggesting Zoro has already discovered Perona's is just guess work. Remember he was wrapped in bandages, hurt and lacking swords when he woke up. Doesn't feel like he was in a position to threaten and/or fight his saviour if you're asking me. There is probably some reason why she gave him his swords back and not only to be kind, but I doubt he threatened her.
-
@JERK:
Perona can't take any of the strong characters down you dumbshit, half the negativity was gag.
If you think an easily dodgable attack, a temporary delay of no permanent effect, can only be beaten in the entire OP verse by Usopp.Then you need to stop whining like the bitch you are Herr Sebe, because this is why we make fun of you, this is also why you couldn't reason yourself out of a paper bag.
And this is why AGOG will be IP banned and you will never be able to post here again without merciless laughter drowning you out.
So half gag = no consistency? There should be some sort of weakness, perhaps the ghosts can be harmed through haki, but Zoro would not know about it, that's what I'm saying.
And misinterpreting a comic book once = laughing stock. Good form.
But doing like you, and only come her to insult those you think are wrong without ever posting a good argument of you own, that's real classy.
This forum hasn't even gotten to the point where we're free to choose what to believe in without being isolated for it. Still stuck in the 16th century, huh.
What's even worse is the level of reading comprehension around here. I may be a Perona supporter, but I'm wide open for suggestions, as long as they sound reasonable. I've never said like AGOG: "Perona will definitely join", I'm just arguing she has a fair chance.
Perona could for all I know end up:
- Befriending the mystery swordsman and stay behind.
- Joining Law
- Joining Buggy
- Joining Luffy
But she won't remain alone, and she won't go back to Moria.
Similarly, Hancock could end up joining Luffy, stalking him or whatever, I don't see her as an unreasonable candidate.
Perhaps no one joins for now. The mermaid princess or fishman X seem fairly reasonable.
Any of this could happen imo, but since the forum says Perona has no chance of joining, I argue against that. What I think is wrong, I contradict. I'm only being stamped hardcore Perona supporter because everybody says she can't join and I talk against. Of course I am a bit biased since she is one of my favorite characters, but all that does here is make me more serious about those theories, it won't affect the voice of reason. Or I'd argue my other favorite Mr.2 for nakama, even though I see him as a support character and nothing more.
-
Herr sebbe. Do you know who Jerk Disease really is.? :ninja:
-
Who is JERK DISEASE? :ermm:
-
-
This forum hasn't even gotten to the point where we're free to choose what to believe in without being isolated for it. Still stuck in the 16th century, huh.
ACE IS GONNA BE REVIVED AND SASUKE WILL FIGHT DADAN. DR VEGAPUNK IS ACTUALLY SANJI.
-
This forum hasn't even gotten to the point where we're free to choose what to believe in without being isolated for it. Still stuck in the 16th century, huh.
People who had opinions this stupid in the 16th century were burnt alive.
-
ACE IS GONNA BE REVIVED AND SASUKE WILL FIGHT DADAN. DR VEGAPUNK IS ACTUALLY SANJI.
HELL YEAH! BUT DON'T FORGET SANJI HAS THREE PERSONALITIES AND AKAINU IS THE ONE WHO'LL REVIVE ACE AND WHITBEARD THROUGH THE USE OF VOLCANIC REACTIONS!!
Herr sebbe. Do you know who Jerk Disease really is.? :ninja:
Taylor Durden?
-
-
Taylor Durden?
Who kicked the bucket? :ermm:
Samuel L Jackson .:happy:
-
-
So half gag = no consistency? There should be some sort of weakness, perhaps the ghosts can be harmed through haki, but Zoro would not know about it, that's what I'm saying.
Zoro would not know about what he already saw in TB. Right right. How do you not constantly fall over in real life.
The ghosts aren't that damn powerful, they're annoying.
Do you seriously think in any truly serious fight with people like Zoro that Perona would be able to do shit?And misinterpreting a comic book once = laughing stock. Good form.
It's kind of like being that kid who with no trace of irony in class comes out with "WAIT, ISNT FRANCE A CONTINENT".
It's not a single moment, but something that requires inherent roots of a deep mental problem and lack of knowledge.But doing like you, and only come her to insult those you think are wrong without ever posting a good argument of you own, that's real classy.
I just refuted your pithy argument. I get the feeling you're just going to deny me any argument by claiming I don't argue.
This forum hasn't even gotten to the point where we're free to choose what to believe in without being isolated for it. Still stuck in the 16th century, huh.
Nothing is more progressive and 21st century then putting down moronic superstitious based thinking.
Welcome to the world post-renaissance n00b.Oh and you're free to be dumb, I'm also free to call you on it. Not sure what you're complaining about??
What's even worse is the level of reading comprehension around here. I may be a Perona supporter, but I'm wide open for suggestions, as long as they sound reasonable. I've never said like AGOG: "Perona will definitely join", I'm just arguing she has a fair chance.
I'm actually more admiring of AGOG fighting for his dumb stance and taking up my bet then your insistence that you aren't that bad, even though you're still fully guilty of what we're all fed up with.
You just lack the balls he has, that's the only difference.Perona could for all I know end up:
- Befriending the mystery swordsman and stay behind.
- Joining Law
- Joining Buggy
- Joining Luffy
But she won't remain alone, and she won't go back to Moria.
In spite of her stated goal being wanting to go back to Moria, that is the only possibility you deny.
That's dumb.
Any of this could happen imo,
All except Perona of course.
but since the forum says Perona has no chance of joining, I argue against that. What I think is wrong, I contradict. I'm only being stamped hardcore Perona supporter because everybody says she can't join and I talk against. Of course I am a bit biased since she is one of my favorite characters, but all that does here is make me more serious about those theories, it won't affect the voice of reason. Or I'd argue my other favorite Mr.2 for nakama, even though I see him as a support character and nothing more.
The word "reason" coming from your mouth…a terrible thing.
-
@JERK:
In spite of her stated goal being wanting to go back to Moria, that is the only possibility you deny. That's dumb.
Yeah, that's pretty bad. Has there ever been an actual argument for Perona? I mean, in short concise sentences, the primary reasons people [AGOG, Herr, ???] think she might join, aside from "want"?
-
Perone can't join. Oda said Ussop will forever be the weakest Crewmember, and as Ussop defeated Perone there just isn't even the slightest chance for her to join.
Haaa take that AGOG -
Yeah, that's pretty bad. Has there ever been an actual argument for Perona? I mean, in short concise sentences, the primary reasons people [AGOG, Herr, ???] think she might join, aside from "want"?
It's all based off of IF Oda decides to revamp her character from how we all knew her before.
Ofcourse they will tell you that those 2 cover stories were him doing just that to her character.
-
It's amusing that Perona supporters somehow believe she has some deep backstory when she doesn't, she's been on Moria's ship since she was a kid. That's it, nothing tragic happened to her and she wasn't a good person who became bad and will become good again.
-
Hancock will join!!! And Perona will get pregnant with Zoro. Jinbei will be killed by, oh let us say Jango
-
Hancock will join!!! And Perona will get pregnant with Zoro. Jinbei will be killed by, oh let us say Jango
Watch out.
Some Hancock fanboy might suck you off for saying that.You better hope there are some Hancock fangirls.
-
I have a (crappy) theory, but here it is anyway.
In Skies of Arcadia, there were 11 possible crew positions(excluding Captain):
Helmsman, Gunner, Lookout, Artisan, Engineer, Builder, Merchant, Jester, Cook, Sailor, and Delegate. applying this to OP, Zoro is the Helmsman, Nami is the Lookout, Usopp is the Gunner, Sanji is the cook, Robin is the Artisan, Franky is the Builder, and Brook is the Jester. the excluded character-Chopper-however, is a Doctor, which applies to no categories in the game. so that leaves 4 spots-Sailor, Engineer, Merchant, and Delegate- left. Now, Faranky possibly fill up both the positon of Builder AND Engineer, so most likelythat's not a potential next person, but I'll kep it on anyway. as for Sailor and Delegate, 2 temporary crewmates-Coby and Vivi- essentially filled these positions. so that means a Merchant and possibly another engineer are left to join the crew (which could make sense, since Luffy said he wanted 10 people, and now has 8.)of course, what could totally bust this theory is that there could be other positions left to fill that were not in the game(as was the case with Doctor), so it's an average theory at best.
-
@ AGOG: you still haven't replied to this
How can you really get involved in a debate over whether Hancock or Jinbei will join if you haven't even read the latest arc, which features both of them fairly prominently?
-
I can see Luffy not obtaining a "10 man crew", like everyone suggests.
Luffy's recruitment could be a pattern.
Captain
LuffyEast****Blue
Zoro
Nami
Usopp
SanjiGrand Line
Chopper
Robin
Franky
BrookNew World
????
????
????
????Just a random thought and I decided to share it.
-
I can see Luffy not obtaining a "10 man crew", like everyone suggests.
Luffy's recruitment could be a pattern.
Captain
LuffyEast****Blue
Zoro
Nami
Usopp
SanjiGrand Line
Chopper
Robin
Franky
BrookNew World
????
????
????
????Just a random thought and I decided to share it.
That's a Random AWESOME thought.
But i think they will have a Captain form Grand Line who is Jinbei, but of course he wont be the Captain of SHs.
and I also would like they dont get Nakama from New World, its better to Go from Red Line to Raftel with same Nakama. -
People who had opinions this stupid in the 16th century were burnt alive.
It would suck to be Herr Sebe at that time…
it would go like this..Herr- "Hear ye hear ye!"
Townspeople talking among themselves "Another idiot trying to sell us something, what's it been, two this week?"
"Aye, it better not be that Perona crap again. Last bloke to say something about her had his tongue and limbs chopped off, then burned at the stake."
Herr- "People, I had a vision regarding Perona!"
Townsperson "Guys, start searching for firewood."
Herr- "I was told by a prophet of Peronaism, which called himself AGOG, that Perona has helped Zoro tie his shoes, therefore she must join!"
Townspeople "Seize Him!"
Herr- "Why the anger? You should all know the uncounterable and massive amount of evidence regarding her joining the Strawhats!"
"Burn him! BURN HIM!"
Something like that
-
Herre Sabbe would be some dong getting in the way of the renaissance.
"YEAH UM, SHAKESPEARE SUCKS, WHY DIDN'T MACBETH WIN, ALL THE SIGNS POINTED TO IT???"
-
@JERK:
Herre Sabbe would be some dong getting in the way of the renaissance.
"YEAH UM, SHAKESPEARE SUCKS, WHY DIDN'T MACBETH WIN, ALL THE SIGNS POINTED TO IT???"
This is rich .