@Besserwisser:
You’re wrong, in this point the Anime make it worse, too. Hawkins said””defense” probability of circumvention 76%”. For me this mean that he can’t by an enemy from Kizarus strength and speed defend 100% and the Anime let him defend 10 times in a row. That’s really unlikely and stupid because I think he will need them. Hawkins and the other Supernovas will fight the Pacifista after Kizaru leaves and because of this Oda didn’t show that Hawkins used all straw-men.
Er, what are you driveling about, anyway whatever happened in the manga in that scene with Kizaru and Hawkins was merely expanded upon in the anime, the same thing happened though.
Go get your facts straight.
Now please don't make this harder than it should be. It is true that they hammer out confusions, but anything that is not shown in a panel in the manga is left to speculation.
The scene in question was shown on panel but just didn't seem clear.
That means that most battle sequences and animations are very often added or created.
We're talking about an on-panel scene.
Granted it uses a certain logic, but it isn't canon.
Yes it is.
And the anime is not overseen by the author directly.
Yes it is. They ask him for everything.
You cannot use the anime to point something that specific within a timeline where that timeline isn't clear in the manga, BECAUSE IT WAS CREATED BY THE ANIMATION TEAM.
The specific point in question whether Luffy was in Gear Second or not which wasn't clear as the dust could have been mistaken for steam. Nothing to do with timelines.
Sure it may sometimes help to make things clearer,
More like most of the time.
but if it isn't clearly shown in the manga, and it IS clearly shown in the anime, then it is more likely the animators filling in the gaps.
There are no gaps to fill, it's an on-panel scene.
You may believe that the anime is a good source, but you are the only one, and that will not change even if you insist.
They have the freakin' author on their side, it's the second best source next to the manga.
Now, if you had stated that after Kuma deflects Luffy's Jet Pistol IN THE MANGA steam no longer comes out of his body, then that may have been a valid way to support your statement, but NEVER "watch the anime".
The same thing happens in the manga but it just didn't look clear. the anime makes it look clear. Go watch the anime.
Even if it is based on the manga.
It's exactly like the manga.
One reason for it in this case is that the panel where luffy screams out Franky's name as he is being poofed, one could interpret that the steam around and proximal to luffy's head is coming out of him, and that it was at the shock of seeing franky poofed away as well that he lost his gear second instead of when he was blocked by Kuma moments before.
Whatever happened in the anime is the correct interpretation because it's the AUTHOR'S interpretation. And let me make this clear because I don't want some goofball misunderstandings that you're capable off. Crap like the Kid/Law filler fight doesn't count because it's filler.
These kinds of ambiguities are settled in the anime because they need to be, but they often settled in the ways that they interpreted them, and are in no way a source for absolute evidence.
No they're interprtetd the way the author tells them to be interpreted.
They might have just as well decided that Gear second was active until after Nami was repelled away to give it a more dramatic effect and I would not have been surprised.
No they wouldn't because it wasn't in the manga.
After all, it's the anime. They do not concern themselves with these extremely specific and small inconsistencies, they just choose and are done with it.
Yes they do, they bust their asses over the smallest detail asking the author for input at important stages.
That is why we do not use the anime for canon reference.
EVER.
You're an idiot.