@Purple:
Autonomy and free thinking does not imply that there aren't difficulties simply because information and reasoning are available. It implies the ability to freely make your own decision from your own perspective. One person's viewpoint may be shaped differently from another's leading to a different set of tools. I mean, life is hard, man. Nobody has all the right answers, and we can only work with what we know. But if we have more information to shape that decision, then it is better than having a limited scope that may be biased towards someone else's agenda. Self-governance, a sense of self, the ego, are what matter when it comes to decision making because in this world, there is not necessarily a single right answer.
I think you and I are talking about two different topics at this point, though. The topic as I interpreted it originally was "knowing too much invades happiness" while yours seems to be more "thinking logically stifles bliss." Information to allow for that sort of reasoning allows for a greater perspective of possibilities, if anything, but decisiveness is one aspect of reasoning that actually also be shaped. Indecision is not bred from too much information necessarily but a lack of perspective. Likewise, someone with too little information may be faced with the pressure that "there isn't any good option."
And no, bravery aren't born from a deductive method, but I don't think that having more information or reasoning to allow for the decision making process necessarily makes decisions more difficult. In many cases, it actually makes things much simpler. Nor does an overly complicated answer have higher merit than something more simple. My point is less about having more tools on hand to come to a decision and more that an informed decision and greater perspective allows for a decision that is not veiled in misunderstanding and misinterpretation. See for example Plato's Allegory of the Cave.
One of the things I've noted is something from Chinese Taoist philosophy, that there is a difference between an opposing factor (something like yin and yang) and a non-opposing factor (something that isn't the opposite but is unlike the other two, wu). I don't think anyone is asking you to reject other people. If there are people you wish not to serve, then that's that. But that does not necessitate your rejection of them, nor does it also imply that you hate them. Rather, they just be "there" to you. Do you hate all those people you bump into the street without knowing their names? In truth, unless you were a very sociopathic individual, I think the answer in most cases is that they just happen to be there. Life simply is too short
I understand the use of information from a pragmatic standpoint, but otherwise… yeah I hadn't considered perspective and the lack of it. I guess I need more information huehuehue
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
Of course not, i'm not Buddah or Mr. Rogers. I would love to be that but i don't i can. Not right now. But striving to love everything is not hugging everyone but to be predisposed to see the good in everything. To believe that everything has the capacity of loving something. To have the disposition to be good and believe that there is good in people. Of course, you won't get to this in day one but at least believing in it.
edit: Hey, let's throw some Vonnegut in it:
“A purpose of human life, no matter who is controlling it, is to love whoever is around to be loved.”
― Kurt Vonnegut, The Sirens of Titan
Maybe I jumped to a conclusion then. Still, from a cold perspective like mine it's a pretty simplistic quote.