Nyeh~ Am I about to be lynched for inactivity? Cool, first time for everything XD Anyway I honestly don't even mind all that much anymore at this point. I won't selfvote because that's counterproductive, but if we wanna move the day forward and see what happens then I don't mind being the sacrificial lamb. Though I would of course prefer it to be someone else XD But there won't be a big loss if it's me.
Before that, though, I'll continue playing so that I won't be a 100% useless townie…
@Foolio:
You know, I'm just going to get back on the trapped wagon as it still seems like one of the best ideas, in my opinion. If Galaxy is the only wagon that can maintain traction though then so be it; it's not like he's been useful.
Vote Lynch: trappedolphin
Can you elaborate? To the best of my memory & reading your previous vote on me was based on activity and Kitty being all weird about meta-but-not-metaing me. Is that still the reason? Cause I'd like to be lynched for a reason.
@Galaxy:
I talk mainly when I feel there is something to add to the conversation. I do not like randomly saying things just to seem like less of a lurker. Before the events of the past day or so, there wasn't much to say, but of course, now there is.
Red Hawk, you keep switching around constantly. Really, since there's no inactivity anymore, you're the one who has seemed the most suspicious to me. You seem to be jumping on a bandwagon that may have some traction, which is scummy.
Vote Lynch: Red Hawk
I'm just quoting this post because it marked some kind of turnaround, but your other posts more recently also seem to show a drastic difference in the way you think, act, and post. What happened to cause this change?
@Galaxy:
What do you think of Red Hawk's constant hopping around? Is it suspicious to you?
Not unless his scumbuddy said "Hey Red Hawk, you're a newbie so it'll be okay if you vote messily. Just keep throwing around votes on wagons and try to help us that way." Which seems unlikely. Usually newbie scums tend to err on the side of caution, I think? Slip-ups aside and I've already said that I'm not waiting for those.
Basically, what I'm saying is that as unhelpful and strange and difficult to understand as it is, I don't think scum would do that.
@Galaxy:
First though, about Iceburg, her lynching of Red Hawk seemed the most legitimate out of them all. There were no patterns in the way they posted, and no "close posting". Can't really get a reading on Wintergt, and it just seems a little weird that a "lurker" such as himself would be mafia along with another lurker.
Winter is a lurker?
@Galaxy:
1. Foolio started the lynch to make himself look innocent later, when Red Hawk turned as Mafia. It's harder to suspect somebody that pushed for the lynch. Red Hawk did not respond to Foolio in the mafia thread, so Foolio thought his best shot would be to push to get rid of his inactive partner, so that suspicions are not raised against him later. Red Hawk posts in the mafia thread, and to cover their tracks, Red Hawk votes to lynch Foolio. This makes it seem to other people that Foolio was just lynching him because of how new he was, and not because of an ulterior motive. Of course, it's also possible that Red Hawk was in on it the whole time, and it was done to confuse the non-mafia players.
2. The Kitsune and Red Hawk wagon is a bit more far fetched, and a bit similar to the Foolio one, so it's probably just a coincidence. Something that I saw that was a bit different, though, was how Red Hawk suddenly changed his mind. Perhaps this is him taking orders from the other thread? I'll quote the posts below:
The main suspicions I found with these four posts were just how close each set was to one another. 9:29 A.M. for one, 9:34 A.M. for another. 10:05 A.M. for one, 10:15 A.M. for another. Possibly a coincidence, but nothing to just overlook when their actions were pretty much the same. AND it happened twice.
If there are 3 Mafia, then it could be logical that both Foolio and Kitsune decided in their thread to get the suspicions off of them and get rid of their lurking partner. Or heck, it's even possible that Red Hawk himself was in on it, and it was done to confuse the rest of the players.
Of course, Harvady made a point that more then two mafia members would make the game more imbalanced, but who knows with this setup. It's a possibility and I must list it to have all scenarios in tact.
Of course, none of this is provable right now, because we have absolutely nothing to go on but speculations and opinions at this time. I usually don't do this, but we need to lynch today. We need answers to many different things that have happened today, and the only way I see that being possible is if we see what a lynch brings us.
As you've acknowledged yourself, this is all speculation. But I do admire the lengths you went to to try to create this story. So here's a question, if we lynch Red Hawk today and he flips town, what will your next step be? Conversely, if he flips mafia, who will you go after - Foolio, Kitty, or someone else entirely? What if they both vote for Reddie?
@wintergt:
Red Hawk plays exactly like I've seen beginning players play in the past. There is nothing all that suspicious about him. Harvady continues to be very fishy. Galaxy looks like scum to me, I mean the premeditated way he shows up here now is not town, it looks like a product of scum planning.
I'd like some elaboration on this too please. What about his actions makes it look like scum planning?
Also this is going to make me an awful awful person and I'll probably be single FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE but I don't like sadfacing Kitty and I'm not sure I buy it totally. I also don't think Kitty and Foolio are both mafia - I can believe they would decide that Kitty would create a ridiculous claim which Foolio would call him out on, but the pattern in which Foolio voted him, Kitty selfvoted, and then Foolio immediately unvoted, doesn't look like a scumbuddy play to me.