miles wasnt for romo? u high haha and you have his te jason who was hell of a good catcher. and even TO was a good wr for him in the past he always had someone. as for marino he will not even be in the top 5 of all time due to not winning any rings hes just makes it into the top 10. rings are what all qbs are judged on like it or not. and for brady against the gaints NO qb can be great every game they are human. they all have bad games.
Miles Austin had 4 good games, and they were all against crappy teams like the Raiders. He sure as hell didn't do shit against good teams like the Chargers.
He's another example of over hype. He had the one great game against KC, and all of the sudden it's OMG he's amazing.
Witten didn't do great this year, good, but not great. This was far from a career year for him. Out of all Romo's options, he was the most consistent.
And Marino will ALWAYS be regarded as one fo the Best.
When you ask people: "Who's the greatest QB of all time, one of three names will be spoken: "Young, Montana, Marino."
Having a SB ring means nothing. Back up QBS get rings along with the rest of the bench players when their teams win, does that make them elite?
Did Barry Sanders ever get a ring? No? Is he the greatest RB of all time, Hell yes he is. Are you going to say someone like Reggie Bish is better because he has a ring? No.
As for the bolded part. You can't just say he had a bad game, especially in the SB. Especially when it was he "who led the Patriots to the other 3 SB victories." No, he got outplayed by Eli Manning, a decent QB.