@Megadoomer:
AGOG, looking through the links to your theories, in order:
Fine, let's continue…
The first link was a reference made to allow the truth about Perona and no speculating...
The second was an argument to create a thorough situation.
You, are oblivious to anything that exists, however.
Character Overview: adds nothing to the discussion
Character Appearance: see character overview
Personality Information: there is literally nothing written there but the word "text", and it's one of the more important sections for a conversation like this
1: has all the panel stuff to shut half of the retards up whining about panels.
2: has definite proof to solidify the general information about Perona– adds some uniqueness to her creation. This was made because half of the idiots said Perona was a fodder.
3: A work in progress is a work in progress-- adding the fact that my account was hijacked by some douche, the truth is that this will be empty until deletion.
Of course, you couldn't see that.
Character Interaction: see personality information
Abilities: see personality information
See the top part.
Occupation: you don't have anything listed for qualities that Perona has which would make her a good lookout, or future uses for such a position, both of which are important. Most of your examples are either thinly-connected to the position or not even related; the only thing that would make sense for having such a position would be large amounts of fog, in which case, the Log Pose would be able to guide them through it.
Actually, like the rest of that post, that stuff wasn't finished… And just to answer your question, the fog wouldn't be able to be solved due to a Log Pose when an iceberg is ahead of them and they cannot see it...
How stupid could you state something? A lookout is needed in difficult terrain, and several other aspects. I explained it for you and everything about Perona tried to avoid speculating so that pussy-bent guys like you wouldn't bitch over something assured.
History: you kind of shoot yourself in the foot with that first section, as it shows that she isn't loyal to Moria after a decade of service. The second section is, again, completely empty, with nothing but the titles and "insert text" typed out. The third section uses lots of terms redundantly, such as defining islands and ruins when such things would be common knowledge, and you spend so much time describing relatively simple scenes (ex. Perona having summoned two negative ghosts when she went to see what had landed). In addition, your general arguments tend to not take into account the presence of the person in the last coverstory page that we saw Zoro in, who would likely be important in solving his predicament (otherwise, he or she would not have been shown, nor would he or she have received so much focus). We were shown very little of the crew's destinations and what happened to them after arriving; certainly not enough to discern motives. She had been bemoaning her lack of servants immediately beforehand, which could have been another reason as to why she bandaged up Zoro.
What a dumbass… Look, when it has "text" that acts as a placeholder, it isn't complete.
Yes, I am glad that you recognized the extensive detail placed on pointless examples that obviously are supposed to be obvious to people like you: however, you still fail. My whole entire idea was to re-type every single detail possible about what "history" Perona actually had, however, I couldn't do anything concerning the first parts since the order was a little off-- I really wanted to wait until the GN came out.
So, you expect me to do what I sought not to do; speculate needlessly over bullshit?
What a moron. The whole thing avoided having to speculate about baseless shit like a SHADOW that can do everything like SUPERMAN, use that brain of yours. I literally couldn't speculate that this random thing will do something, therefore, OF COURSE I had to ignore him or downplay anything about him-- otherwise, it'd have been the same bullshit you have.
Prove all that you say about it because that one shaded figure isn't as important as you make them out to be since that dude cannot even navigate-- at least, not that you can STATE a claim of.
Trivia: this entire section is filled with information that is useless to the argument at hand, and you had already stated it earlier
Used to copy the wikipedia.
IF you were even intelligent, you'd have understood that during the time I made this shit, I stated: "I hate how wrong Wiki was, therefore, I'll make my own version and post it on here!!"
I know you post on that site, and I know you support your dearest Hancock like a fool, but don't think you know anything when you can't even figure out what the heck something is talking about… This wasn't a speculation post, dude, it was mostly a "fact" post to label everything as it is, and create a characterization to convince natural dimwits like yourself... LIKE all of Hancock's fanbase of OMF which is stupid as hell concerning anything related to One Piece.
In the second post…
Overview: you completely ignore all other possibilities; just because cause and effect comes into play (as it does in most stories), it doesn't mean that there is only one effect that is possible. You're only focusing on what you want to happen, while ignoring all other potential outcomes of the situation.
You dumbass… This is an ARGUMENT that has to lead you to the point I'm going at... Not a list of categories. No shit I am being biased and selecting what I have to feed into your inbred head.
Furthermore, the CAUSE and EFFECT is simple as shit: "Look, Oda did all this shit for Perona, therefore, she's going to be important!!" and what I state is she's going to travel with them, at least.
But, all the people that underplay this say, "you spend too much on one thing" like a bunch of morons that failed college... No SHIT!! What else is there to spend on?
- Perona will die – when will this ever happen?
- Zoro will find his way – the irony...
- Some random dimwit will find Zoro – in hell...
- Kuma has a "reverse" trick up his sleeve – as if...
- Something even more pointless…
Whatever you want to argue about, clearly state it rather than leave a "vague" answer like "there's other stuff…" which you can't even state. Why not offer one and then we'll argue over how stupid your suggestion is.
Cause: the entire prologue consists of things that you made up, gave impossible/unlikely meanings to, or are taking too far out of context (ex. the placement of Perona's ghosts, your claims that this "foreshadows" something). The first section is rendered pointless because, shortly after finding out what the ghosts do, Luffy loses all interest in keeping them.
LMAO– what a dumbass you are. It's 100% mockery of all of the bullshit that hancock fans try to put up as a "logical" argument like Kuja = 9 and that's Hancock for nakama...
Look, everything in the cause is basically to allow all those dimwits that believe in this pathetic nonsense that there's this nonsense for Perona too... I was merely listing pointless, meaningless, trivial coincidences to mean whatever I care-- 100% mockery of YOU.
In the second section, Sanji's comment is referring to the fact that the ghosts are different from the zombies (not solid, among other things), which hints that they're Devil Fruit based, or at least don't have the same origin as the zombies.
Yawn… Need help here?
The third section, as you admit yourself, is pointless. In the fourth section, the first part (knowledge of the crew beating Crocodile) is common knowledge at this point, especially among the Shichibukai, and the second is played for comedy.
Didn't understand a damn thing, right? Once again, everything was to be read as over-the-top bullshit that your stupid fanbase supporters have made up– and you too...
The fifth section is merely a manga cliche - characters rarely go all-out at the start; otherwise, the battles wouldn't last as long. The sixth section is merely pointing out that she's taking everything that isn't nailed down and leaving in Thriller Bark's hour of need, which doesn't help your argument that she's a good loyal person.
Lol…
A good loyal person? You are STUPID AS SHIT. Your favorite character isn't even ONE BIT loyal, nor a good person... What hypocrisy!!
My argument isn't about characterization here, it's strictly from the writer's point of view-- you may argue all about intangibles as you like, but that's what you call trivial.
The seventh section, can be rendered void by the fact that she stated that she joined for fun and wasn't going to stay if her life was in danger, as you yourself cited as an example in your first post, where the translation was made by one of the most reliable One Piece translators, Steven.
For "fun" doesn't define the fact that it is vague as shit? Elaborate please what the fuck this "fun" means dumbass, rather than stating groundless statements that lead nowhere…
The eighth section makes no sense - if she fails so much, and she's such a minor character, what plot-based reason would there be for her to join, particularly when almost none of the Straw Hat crew would have a reason to trust her, and Zoro (the only one who would have any sort of reason to) is, by far, the least trusting member of the group (it took all of Skypiea for him to trust Robin).
This is the irony of the whole thing– I'm mocking the FUCKING SHIT out of your dumbass...
Come on, all those people that claim: "Perona sucks" all day like a nagging wife-- I stated that there's no way she's coming back and going to be important, however, thanks to Oda being Oda, she's back to fuck the shit out of you...
Can't you tell? If she sucks so much, like the world claims, then why the hell is she back in the first place...
The epilogue is mostly pointless ("the characters shop for clothes and Sanji can cook; therefore, Perona will join!", the rest of it is either stuff you've stated before, or stuff you made up)
It's the minor stuff that lead to the major stuff… Furthermore, I didn't say she would join, dip shit. I said that she'd be able to meet up with them... Learn to read, please.
Effect: almost all of this segment is jumping to conclusions with no real proof either way.
I get this a lot when I have stupid people argue against this… Like before, explain where it is "proof-less" and wrong. I'm awaiting a good laugh.
As well, you completely ignore the person who appeared at the end of the cover-story; given what little happened in it otherwise, that person will serve some purpose as well, or otherwise, Oda would have used those two panels to cover some other aspect of Zoro's stay on the island.
Yes, I am dead-on with everything else but this mysterious dude that doesn't even get an appearance… Let's say this to make you happy: "he'll teach Zoro Haki," and now we can move on...
Reason? None, cause he doesn't even matter at all... This dimwit isn't important.
So, I loved how you couldn't even state a damn THING aside from the loose idea that there's OTHER stuff that you couldn't even have a pondering to define.
Waste my time, and LIKE I said before, you didn't have a clue at all on how to read that post.