@Monkey:
blah blah blah
Cut the shit already. I don't udnerstand monkey's language.
@Monkey:
blah blah blah
Cut the shit already. I don't udnerstand monkey's language.
Cut the shit already. I don't udnerstand monkey's language.
I'm still lollin' at how dumb a person has to be to make that post with that timing. It looks scripted its so perfect.
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
ahahahaha, I didn't even notice the databook "fact" you were getting excited about was FROM the sandman post
holllly shit lol
Ahahahah this monkey really has some brain issues )
I wrote "Wow" which means surprise. Which means I got surprised of databook's "Vista might be superior to Mihawk". Which I emphasized by "He cannot be superior". Then this clown-monkey starts telling me about legitimateness of databook. Sandman, which I respect a lot, said it's not 100% legit. But he didn't say "they are not legit at all". Of course monkey won't understant human language.
Ahahahah this monkey really has some brain issues )
I wrote "Wow" which means surprise. Which means I got surprised of databook's "Vista might be superior to Mihawk". Which I emphasized by "He cannot be superior". Then this clown-monkey starts telling me about legitimateness of databook. Sandman, which I respect a lot, said it's not 100% legit. But he didn't say "they are not legit at all". Of course monkey won't understant human language.
Murcielago, the sort of person who upon hearing that there is a problem of rat poop in a recent shipment of Cheerios says "THAT DOES NOT MEAN ITS ALL RAT POOP".
If the source is spotty and not even first-hand to begin with, it is not authoritative. It is not citeable.
This whole thread is kind of a mess, we have like 10% discussion about bras, 30% on Dressrosa, 35% about the end of thriller bark and 25% on the actual chapter.
To try and get the topic on track, does 12 chapters seem kind of quick to reach a mid boss that is certainly a tough fight for luffy, I was talking to someone and he bascially agreed with me that it would depend on how long the arc would last. Im guessing this one might be 55-65 chapters about the same amount as alabasta or skypiea, it seems a little early for the fight to conclude but Im still of the opinion it'll happen and last say two chapters.
Of course this arc has so many players oda can definitely keep the story really interesting in the middle parts of the arc. Not that they are boring because adventure is a huge part of why I love this series but dressrosa had a ton of running and not thaat much exploring or interesting sideplots half way through like alabasta, skypiea, impel down, heck even punk hazard was arguably better IMO. Back to the point though oda can do a ton of exploring aince the island is huge and has tons of enemies and there's the huge amont of backstories and character development fro, qncilliary characters in this arc.
@Monkey:
If the source is spotty and not even first-hand to begin with, it is not authoritative. It is not citeable.
Databook is reliable source. Not 100% legit information since there might be some mistakes, but the point of information is reliable. It's made by magazine, if I'm not mistaken. They wouldn't make unreliable source. They wrote Vista is equal or superior to Mihawk. Of course he cannot be superior but the point is that he can be as goog as Mihawk at swordsmanship. Just a little bit worse. That's all I'm saying. If you think I insulted you somehow then you have my apologies.
Databook is reliable source.
In the same sense as the wiki.
Which (guess what!) makes it non-authoritative. Therefore not a magical "Oda sayz" source like you and so many other stubborn fools desperately wish it was. And it damn sure isn't the same as citing actual dialogue or panels of the manga.
It's made by magazine, if I'm not mistaken.
It's called a publisher.
They wouldn't make unreliable source.
This is going to blow your brain, but manga publishing houses are entertainment companies that enjoy releasing products from their franchises to make money.
They are not goddamned scholarly journals that carefully peer review material they put out for accuracy.
Because this is a databook about a rubber pirate comic book, and not an academic publication.
That you think there's deep intense scrutiny to the accuracy of a flimsy little tankoban side release…..what earth are you even living on?
Of course he cannot be superior but the point is that he can be as goog as Mihawk at swordsmanship.
Great.
Maybe so. But if someone asks you for your evidence or reason for thinking this, you can't bring up DATABOOK.
Especially when Vista confidently standing up to Mihawk is y'know, a panel or two in the manga.
Damn, I shudder to think how far this thread would plummet if OP was on break this week. I almost wish… No.
Damn, I shudder to think how far this thread would plummet if OP was on break this week. I almost wish… No.
I thought about calling someone out on how life-or-death seriously they're taking things that aren't even specifically stated in the manga, are open to interpretation and aren't that important anyway; but if it wasn't this it'd be a dead topic, and the kids seem to be having fun, so why spoil it That was earlier, and now, the spoilers for the next chapter are out anyway.
Before reading the spoilers, I thought this arc could last 90 chapters. Cracker can for sure go down in a chapter or two.
With so many sons and daughters it wouldn't surprise me if there are introduction panels worth a whole chapter alone still ahead of us.
@Tamiel:
Before reading the spoilers, I thought this arc could last 90 chapters. Cracker can for sure go down in a chapter or two.
That's also a slight spoiler, you know. Contain your erection a little, please.
That's also a slight spoiler, you know. Contain your erection a little, please.
But its hard, to contain.
@Monkey:
It's the thematic set up for the ENTIRE Water 7/Eneis Lobby stuff.
Oda throws down the "Wow! What if we lost crew members!" thing and then cracks his knuckles before embarking on like ten volumes with conflicts based around that concern.
yeah okay, I'm facing some stubborn comrades here.
even though you are trying to find a legit reason to the existence of Foxy and his game, it was still unnecessary.
this arc ( except the last 3chapters with Aokiji that introduces the following arc, and thus not really introducing anything. just the story that is going on. ) has no impact whatsoever.
even though we see this guy here again http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/onepiece/images/2/24/Chapter_650.png/revision/latest?cb=20130121102348
Foxy and his game are still unnecessary.
I'm ready to withdraw everything I've just said if we ever hear about him only once or see him in a mini-story.
BECAUSE IT JUST SEEMS SOOOOOO NON-CANON.
and do not answer me "hey, I ( we ) said it sets up the sadness about losing a friend. DID U IVIN RID ME ?"
Chopper crying doesn't change anything about all of this being unnecessary. let's not say pointless then, but unnecessary ( which is the same )
Also it acts as light comic relief before a really dark couple volumes (namely volume 35).
i'm talking "arc not connected to anything". nothing to say about jokes and funny scenes or what.
Oda knows what he's doing, you clearly don't.
:cwy:
@John:
"serious fights" only happening at the end of an arc, after exposing how bad is the bad-guy is annoying. I hope this is going to be a full-combat. even though i know it will get interrupted somehow. but the author needs to show us that Luffy can face something like Jack ( at least, AT LEAST !!! ).
The problem with this arc is that Big Mom's top commanders and Big Mom herself are superior to Luffy… I'd prefer if there were no serious fights at all.
The problem with this arc is that Big Mom's top commanders and Big Mom herself are superior to Luffy… I'd prefer if there were no serious fights at all.
well. we have actually no clue about Luffy's "true" bounty. The WG ( and a lot of fans ) thinks he didn't beat Doflamingo alone. which is why he has a bounty of 500millions ( same as Law ) and not more. we also ignore the "true" bounty of Doflamingo, the guy's bounty was frozen because he became a shichibukai a long time ago. his bounty worths 340millions but could have easily and obviously have one-shot every supernovae ( before the ellipse ) at the same time in a fight.
we don't know if Doflamingo is as strong as Jack or Cracker, weaker or stronger.
I think this is pretty obvious now why Oda has given Luffy a bounty of 500millions, it was for the introduction of Jack that has the exact double of Luffy's bounty.
20 weeks ago ( even more actually ) which means 2 volumes ago, Jack was introduced. it is now time to give us hope that Luffy can fight against such monster. even though 20 chapters doesn't seem like a big deal in One Piece, I think Oda is trying to speed up things, not rushing his manga but avoiding pointless and unnecessary stuff at least. so yes, I believe he'll show us more than Luffy vs Issho Fujitora.
the only really serious fight that I think is confirmed now is Sanjy vs Sanji's father.
@John:
well. we have actually no clue about Luffy's "true" bounty.
What we do know is that Cracker was sent because Big Mom knew how strong Doflamingo was, meaning Cracker is near Dofla's level (except for if Big Mom underestimated him, which I highly doubt). Considering how hard it was for Luffy to beat Dofla, I don't think a fight against Cracker on Big Mom's territory (where he is surrounded by enemies) would benefit him at all. If he were to win, would he still be in shape to save Sanji (= his initial goal)? … Probably not. Fighting Cracker now equates to lowering his chances of saving Sanji.
@John:
the only really serious fight that I think is confirmed now is Sanjy vs Sanji's father.
I would like to see this too, but I don't know how it could happen.
Doubt Cracker is anywhere near Dofla. That's just conjecture based on a theory that BM thought Cracker is supposed to do the clean up himself.
@John:
yeah okay, I'm facing some stubborn comrades here.
even though you are trying to find a legit reason to the existence of Foxy and his game,
I'm not "trying" to find shit. I not only sat through the arc when it came out and had no inkling of what came next, but on rereads of the series when you have everything clearly in mind it's also really obvious.
The Speed Read MGee's of the world sure do like to tell folks whats what about this series lol.
this arc ( except the last 3chapters with Aokiji that introduces the following arc, and thus not really introducing anything. just the story that is going on. ) has no impact whatsoever.
Great job there pal. Just completely ignore the actual shit I mentioned, because none of it was "It had Aokiji in it!".
Christ, you're even speed reading my posts.
BECAUSE IT JUST SEEMS SOOOOOO NON-CANON.
You have no idea what this word means.
and do not answer me "hey, I ( we ) said it sets up the sadness about losing a friend. DID U IVIN RID ME ?"
"Please don't mention the things you said when I respond without mentioning anything you said. And just what some other people said."
That's the actual content of my post you dimwit.
Chopper crying doesn't change anything about all of this being unnecessary. let's not say pointless then, but unnecessary ( which is the same )
It sets a tone. This is what storytellers actually do when they tell stories, things like that. Speed reading dolts who can barely parse a couple sentence long forums post don't even notice this sort of thing, but their brains still do.
i'm talking "arc not connected to anything". nothing to say about jokes and funny scenes or what.
Seriously, take five goddamn seconds to slow down and actually fucking read what I wrote.
You're responding here as if I said "It acts as light comic relief" and then said nothing else DIRECTLY after that. What the fuck happened? Did you black out and wake up on the floor?
Go back and read the whole thing.
Or better yet, if that's too hard, don't make posts at all and waste everyone's time.
AP's rule number 1:
-Don't get in any kind of debate with MonkeyKing. His ego is bigger than Trump's dick.
His time is "everyone's time" somehow. but he prefers referring to it like that because he knows he will look like he's a cocky old boy if he says "hey stop wasting MY time, I have too much things to do, like insulting someone else on AP".
( now waiting for Monkey's fanboy "uhhh MonkeyKing is so smart and your point doesn't stand because uhhh it's not a good point, more than that, I'd even say it's a shitty point LIKE YOU:ninja:" )
you should re-name "Rude" :cwy:
That's also a slight spoiler, you know. Contain your erection a little, please.
My comment was before I read any spoilers. Sorry it sounded like a realization after I read them. On the erection…well I'm Franky in Chopper's body and I just went full Rumble! :3
@John:
AP's rule number 1:
-Don't get in any kind of debate with MonkeyKing. His ego is bigger than Trump's dick.
His time is "everyone's time" somehow. but he prefers referring to it like that because he knows he will look like he's a cocky old boy if he says "hey stop wasting MY time, I have too much things to do, like insulting someone else on AP".( now waiting for Monkey's fanboy "uhhh MonkeyKing is so smart and your point doesn't stand because uhhh it's not a good point, more than that, I'd even say it's a shitty point LIKE YOU:ninja:" )
you should re-name "Rude" :cwy:
Turns out people don't like it when you skim read their posts!
@The:
All this talk about Zoro and Sanji fanboys and I'm like:
Where's the Usopp and Jinbei fanboys?:sad:
i liked usopp enough before Oda made his character made a somersault backwards
my favorite fight in the manga is still usopp vs perona though@Don:
It´s exhausting to see what crap OP theorists put on YouTube to get some clicks.
Each crack brained thought running through their mind gets a video, without thinking twice about it.
But putting out there 100 theories, where occasionally a random statement within those videos comes true (by pure theory of chance), makes them messiahs.
Also by that the monkeys get banana, so who can blame them.
Monkey see, monkey do.
Sawyer7mage is the only youtuber I like. Rogersbase and Forneverworld annoy me, and Kingoflightning's videos are too long.
@Don:
I don´t mind some of the chapter reviews, some are funny enough to enjoy them.
Theories on the other hand are just unbearable.
Those titles don´t promise anything worth even considering clicking and the few that i dared to…
totally agree…the world of "onepiece theorists" on youtube is pure garbage...
talking about reviewers, sawyer seems the only decent one left since it doesn't limit himself to just reading the chapter out loud and overreact for anything and call it a review...
there was also another guy that was good,but now he doesn't make chapters reviews anymore
@John:
AP's rule number 1:
-Don't get in any kind of debate with MonkeyKing. His ego is bigger than Trump's dick.
His time is "everyone's time" somehow. but he prefers referring to it like that because he knows he will look like he's a cocky old boy if he says "hey stop wasting MY time, I have too much things to do, like insulting someone else on AP".( now waiting for Monkey's fanboy "uhhh MonkeyKing is so smart and your point doesn't stand because uhhh it's not a good point, more than that, I'd even say it's a shitty point LIKE YOU:ninja:" )
you should re-name "Rude" :cwy:
What dick? Trump doesn't have one. lol
@Monkey:
Do you think Oda is self-published??? I don't even…
--- Update From New Post Merge ---
They're assembled by various people from some department within Shueisha, and probably some additional notes Oda sends them. Usually most of the content is essentially just a book wikipedia.
"Canon" isn't relevant and has nothing to do with the conversation at all. The issue is it's not a trustworthy source on the whole. Created by third party people with minimal first party input.
I'm in agreement we shouldn't take it for 100 % but there is still good content in the DataBooks and tell me what you think about this –>Oda encourages his readers to Buy // Read the data books. LOL a lot of people are quoting/ citing you right now your Notifications are probably going crazy.
@John:
AP's rule number 1:
-Don't get in any kind of debate with MonkeyKing. His ego is bigger than Trump's dick.
Uhh, I doubt that's such a big feat…or do you know something the rest of us don't?:ninja:
Uhh, I doubt that's such a big feat…or do you know something the rest of us don't?:ninja:
And there is also some irony in what I said.
Literally probably posted only once with this account but had to log in to post my crack theory.
When Cracker says "According to Mama her previous 43 husbands don't count." I though, there has to be a 44th then. A current one.
And who came to mind? Well, Jinbe was supposed to be being punished for something, no?
I'm calling it. Jinbe is 44th husband.
Just out of curiosity, how many here would want to be a husband (or wife) of Big Mom?
@Medical:
Just out of curiosity, how many here would want to be a husband (or wife) of Big Mom?
You underestimate the allure of wealth and power.
And yeah, Jinbe seems to be the only reasonablr candidate for a new husband if it's not a brand new character.
@Count:
You underestimate the allure of wealth and power.
And yeah, Jinbe seems to be the only reasonablr candidate for a new husband if it's not a brand new character.
Underestimate? I'd want to marry her myself. Big Mom's family might get a discount on sweets in Totland (maybe they're even free for them).
@Medical:
Underestimate? I'd want to marry her myself. Big Mom's family might get a discount on sweets in Totland (maybe they're even free for them).
That certainly sounds like a pretty sweet life to me.
I'm in agreement we shouldn't take it for 100 % but there is still good content in the DataBooks
Yes, much like the wiki.
But we still don't cite the wiki as an authoritative source.
Oda encourages his readers to Buy // Read the data books.
He also encourages people to watch the anime and movies. What's your point.
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
@John:
And there is also some irony in what I said.
Yes surely a grown man getting in a middle school level fight on live tv over his penis size has great confidence in that area.
@Medical:
Just out of curiosity, how many here would want to be a husband (or wife) of Big Mom?
I'd never even consider this… ugh...
Speaking of which. I was daydreaming today and I thought of an animated series in which Black Beard would like to have a wife. All his childhood people had been calling him ugly and repulsive.
And Bonney rejected him harshly.
One day he asked San Juan Wolf: "Hey, you understand me, right?"
But San Juan answered: "I have three children... well, I'm divorced, now. My wife sold me to the navy a couple of years ago..."
This is how Black Beard learns about Big Mom and then tries to marry her.
I'd never even consider this… ugh...
Speaking of which. I was daydreaming today and I thought of an animated series in which Black Beard would like to have a wife. All his childhood people had been calling him ugly and repulsive.
And Bonney rejected him harshly.
One day he asked San Juan Wolf: "Hey, you understand me, right?"
But San Juan answered: "I have three children... well, I'm divorced, now. My wife sold me to the navy a couple of years ago..."
This is how Black Beard learns about Big Mom and then tries to marry her.
How I Met Your Mother starring Blackbeard would be the dream series I never knew I wanted.
Considering his taste in pies Blackbeard is fine with the crappiest of them. I don't think he'd like some of, say, Pudding's craftswomanshift. And women in general? I think this is a parallel to Luffy. No interest.
Considering his taste in pies Blackbeard is fine with the crappiest of them. I don't think he'd like some of, say, Pudding's craftswomanshift. And women in general? I think this is a parallel to Luffy. No interest.
Is that why Bonney kicked him in the face when Teach asked her to take the prestigious pirate crew position of ship wench?
@Count:
Is that why Bonney kicked him in the face when Teach asked her to take the prestigious pirate crew position of ship wench?
That scene just felt like threatening her. This guy is ugly and beyond 40. And one of the most ambitious characters, only interested in strength. I'll revoke my statement if we see female slaves by his side the next time we see him though.
That scene just felt like threatening her. This guy is ugly and beyond 40. And one of the most ambitious characters, only interested in strength. I'll revoke my statement if we see female slaves by his side the next time we see him though.
You need to see female slaves to get an idea that a character finds a certain gender attractive? I get that's probably a hyperbole (at least I hope), but you don't need to see a character in an active relationship or making sexual contact to know they're not asexual. He didn't just taunt Bonney from a distance, he got intimate enough to be face-to-face with her while putting his hand on her chin. Not to mention that Catarina remarked on how he got rejected and how flustered Blackbeard was at his reaction with Bonney to think she was an "improper" woman.
Also, unsightly middle-aged guys can't be interested in women? lol What? You're supposed to lower your standards or Power hungry guys, especially in fiction, are often into that. Just look at Jafar in Aladdin, to point out one of limitless examples. Blackbeard cares about strength (which is what he looks for the most in a crew and is why he didn't offer Bonney a serious crew position), but he's also constantly indulging in selfish vices and pastimes like constantly eating cherry pies and carrying around whiskey glasses in his pants as jolly criminal that lives life to the fullest. I doubt that he's somehow above lust like he has arbitrary ethical standards despite how much of a slimy coward he is. Especially since he is the character that resembles popular notions of pirates the most, which include engaging in pillaging, destruction, and rape/prostitution. Is it really too much to suggest that Blackbeard being interested in women can just be an opposite trait meant to counter how asexual Luffy is? Being an ambitious person doesn't mean you have to be a workaholic that can't have any fun and enjoy other opportunities and pastimes in life on the side.
@Tamiel:
My comment was before I read any spoilers. Sorry it sounded like a realization after I read them. On the erection…well I'm Franky in Chopper's body and I just went full Rumble! :3
Well it sounded like it. I figured Cracker was on defensive or something.
It did seem suspicious that someone like you would just blurt out stuff about unreleased chapter.
@Count:
You need to see female slaves to get an idea that a character finds a certain gender attractive? I get that's probably a hyperbole (at least I hope), but you don't need to see a character in an active relationship or making sexual contact to know they're not asexual. He didn't just taunt Bonney from a distance, he got intimate enough to be face-to-face with her while putting his hand on her chin. Not to mention that Catarina remarked on how he got rejected and how flustered Blackbeard was at his reaction with Bonney to think she was an "improper" woman.
Also, unsightly middle-aged guys can't be interested in women? lol What? You're supposed to lower your standards or Power hungry guys, especially in fiction, are often into that. Just look at Jafar in Aladdin, to point out one of limitless examples. Blackbeard cares about strength (which is what he looks for the most in a crew and is why he didn't offer Bonney a serious crew position), but he's also constantly indulging in selfish vices and pastimes like constantly eating cherry pies and carrying around whiskey glasses in his pants as jolly criminal that lives life to the fullest. I doubt that he's somehow above lust like he has arbitrary ethical standards despite how much of a slimy coward he is. Especially since he is the character that resembles popular notions of pirates the most, which include engaging in pillaging, destruction, and rape/prostitution. Is it really too much to suggest that Blackbeard being interested in women can just be an opposite trait meant to counter how asexual Luffy is? Being an ambitious person doesn't mean you have to be a workaholic that can't have any fun and enjoy other opportunities and pastimes in life on the side.
Yeah, agreed about Teach. ( even though putting rape in One Piece will never happen… )
But people should stop calling Luffy an asexual. This thing doesn't even exist.
And why is he an "asexual" ? Because he didn't wanna fuck Hancock when her saw her naked in the bath ? ( and some other stuff too ).
Luffy is just this dumb character, he doesn't think about anything when he saw her naked because he doesn't know what's going on. Zoro too doesn't give a damn about women but he, at least, would have understand that spying a women in the bath is inappropriate.
@John:
But people should stop calling Luffy an asexual. This thing doesn't even exist.
And why is he an "asexual" ? Because he didn't wanna fuck Hancock when her saw her naked in the bath ? ( and some other stuff too )..
You answered your question - he's so simple minded, doing anything with Hancock doesn't cross his mind.
You answered your question - he's so simple minded, doing anything with Hancock doesn't cross his mind.
but the term "asexual" is just out of context.
is a 5years old kid an asexual ?
@John:
Yeah, agreed about Teach. ( even though putting rape in One Piece will never happen… )
But people should stop calling Luffy an asexual. This thing doesn't even exist.
And why is he an "asexual" ? Because he didn't wanna fuck Hancock when her saw her naked in the bath ? ( and some other stuff too ).
Oda said that Luffy is only attracted to adventure.
And yes asexuality exists. I'm asexual.
@John:
Yeah, agreed about Teach. ( even though putting rape in One Piece will never happen… )
But people should stop calling Luffy an asexual. This thing doesn't even exist.
And why is he an "asexual" ? Because he didn't wanna fuck Hancock when her saw her naked in the bath ? ( and some other stuff too ).
Luffy is just this dumb character, he doesn't think about anything when he saw her naked because he doesn't know what's going on. Zoro too doesn't give a damn about women but he, at least, would have understand that spying a women in the bath is inappropriate.
I have met plenty of people that aren't interested in the body in a sexual fashion and don't find anyone physically attractive, or even to the point of disgust, while being interested in emotional-based relationships. Yes, it is a thing, and a pretty simple concept at that. And Luffy might be a dumbass, but that doesn't mean knowing about the stuff or not will change anything (it's marginally possible he might have a kid in the epilogue, but that's pretty much the extent of anything relationship-related we'll get a focus on). Being told how to make babies and that women are attractive isn't going to suddenly change how he feels because that's somebody else's perspective. In fact, do you even need to know that to find certain people attractive in general? You don't need to learn the birds and the bees to suddenly change how you see a certain gender. But the last thing I want is to turn this into a Tumblr-style discussion, so I'll just leave it at that.
And I only mentioned rape to highlight how much pirates are associated with womanizing and sexual interest. Of course we won't literally go that far lol.
@Count:
I have met plenty of people that aren't interested in the body in a sexual fashion and don't find anyone physically attractive, or even to the point of disgust, while being interested in emotional-based relationships.
If they feel disgust toward humain body, they have a complex with their human condition, it has nothing to do with some imaginary attraction toward neither boys nor girls.
the very concept of "asexuality" has nothing to do with ONLY lust. I know few guys and women that can live without sex ( and actually, everyone can ) but they are STRAIGHT people, it doesn't make them "asexual". Being an heterosexual doesn't make you wanna fuck everyone.
And well, being in a relationship and not having sex doesn't make an "asexual" either.
Yes, it is a thing, and a pretty simple concept at that. And Luffy might be a dumbass, but that doesn't mean knowing about the stuff or not will change anything.
But whatev, someone like Luffy doesn't even exist in real life. So, having a debate about his dick is pointless. ( like debating about the Joker or some shit like that )
It's not even like the psycho-analysis One Piece was accurate in the first place so no need to talk about Luffy and his so-called asexuality.
@John:
If they feel disgust toward humain body, they have a complex with their human condition, it has nothing to do with some imaginary attraction toward neither boys nor girls.
the very concept of "asexuality" has nothing to do with ONLY lust. I know few guys and women that can live without sex ( and actually, everyone can ) but they are STRAIGHT people, it doesn't make them "asexual". Being an heterosexual doesn't make you wanna fuck everyone.
Romantic attraction and sexual attraction are two different things. If someone feels romantic attraction but not sexual attraction, that would make them a hetero/homo/bi/panromantic asexual. And if someone experiences neither romantic or sexual attraction, they're an aromantic asexual.
If asexuality doesn't exist, explain how I'm not attracted to men or women. Also, you can't use the "disgust toward human body" angle because I'm not disgusted by the human body.
@Medical:
Romantic attraction and sexual attraction are two different things. If someone feels romantic attraction but not sexual attraction, that would make them a hetero/homo/bi/panromantic asexual. And if someone experiences neither romantic or sexual attraction, they're an aromantic asexual.
yes, the word asexual does exist, but it's just a word. I could very well create a word too like, hmmm, sapiosexual and say I'm only attracted to people I find smart (which would be horseshit.)
If asexuality doesn't exist, explain how I'm not attracted to men or women. Also, you can't use the "disgust toward human body" angle because I'm not disgusted by the human body.
How am I suppose to do that. I only know your username. You think that by saying you're asexual it makes it a proof that asexuality exist ?
well, either way, don't think this is the suitable place to try to psychoanalyze you or something.
@John:
yes, the word asexual does exist, but it's just a word. I could very well create a word too like, hmmm, sapiosexual and say I'm only attracted to people I find smart (which would be horseshit.)
How am I suppose to do that. I only know your username. You think that by saying you're asexual it makes it a proof that asexuality exist ?
well, either way, don't think this is the suitable place to try to psychoanalyze you or something.
Asexuality wasn't a word someone randomly made up. Since you mentioned sapiosexual which is commonly considered a tumblr snowflake identity, I assume you think asexuality is one too. It's true that tumblr and other places have created needless labels and identities but asexuality has been actually mentioned and studied before tumblr even existed.
Well, I am asexual. I've never experienced attraction to anyone, man or woman. The fact that I'm asexual I think would indicate that asexuality exists. Just like the fact there are straight and gay people indicates that straight and gay people exist.