@Cymelion:
I get some of the complaints - but they also seem rather convoluted or trying to justify the hatred style.
It's ok to say "I don't like Moffat's stories" and leave it at that - it's another thing to say "I don't like Moffat's stories and I'll do my best to make everyone else hate them too"
Isn't this intellectual dishonesty, though? That's what it looks like from my perspective.
A dislike of something always boils down to some aspects of the thing being at odds with a person's worldview, and if you're discerning enough you can maybe tell what those things are and whether you would have liked something more if it was any different. Rants, or opinions as they're called, whether written or spoken, are nothing but communicated analyses of those aspects that people make to both get some clarification to the validity their own thoughts and to raise some discussion about their observations.
That article was nothing but a person's take on why Moffat's era of Doctor Who writing was not very engaging, and why Matt Smith could have benefited more of a different kind of a writer. It was their genuine opinion, which I don't think was written just to add fuel to the fire. And having opinions is always allowed, as is speaking out one's own opinion. No one needs to read them or listen to them, and no one is forced to do so. If it resonates badly with someone else because it does make them feel uncomfortable, the problem is always with the person who, for whatever reason, feels uncomfortable, and they need to sort it out themselves.
After all, is is a fact that Moffat's writing had things that made people bristle in it. It is by no means perfect, and neither was RTD's writing. But you have to take them at face value and acknowledge them for what they are before making a judgment. And if that means that you can't enjoy them anymore, then too bad, Doctor Who just isn't a good series to you anymore.