Meh. Wahtever
Change Vote Lynch: Huschel
Meh. Wahtever
Change Vote Lynch: Huschel
Also, I'm quite disappointing that one of you isn't role-playing more, I was really looking forward to it. Maybe I should have used an external forum after all…...sigh
If the action of acting as a character who is indeed not myself is what you desire for me to do, I will act as the character, whose name is unknown to the remainder of the players, whom you have assigned to me to act as for the remainder of the amount of time of this game, which bears the name Mafia, that I am still available to play so that I may give you proper enjoyment from which you will receive feelings of pleasure and glee. I, Mr. Habaneroo, does not have the desire to give you feelings of disappointment with which you can use to verbally attack and force upon me feelings of guilt on other forms of communication on this online system called the internet. So, remember that I, Mr. Habaneroo, will continue to act as said unknown character during times when the people involved in this game are conducting in frivolous activities because I will grow tired of the repetition that is involved with writing in the style of the said character who is unknown to the people involved in this game except for the moderators and myself.
! In other words: Sure, why not.
CUUUURSES! These take a lot longer than they would seem. :(
I don't even know what to say. I know (well, guess…) you are all trying to just have a fun first day, but that's not going to help the town in any way. And don't you dare say there's never anything useful on day one. Question for everyone now. I know some of you have answered some or part of it but I want to get everyone to say something about the same topic:
What do you think of the setup, and do you believe anything Wooden claimed? What do you think the challenges will be for the town in the configuration you imagine and how will it affect your game?
Why didn't my vote change either? Not that it matters. Unvote
I suppose it is possible that there is a fool. But if Wooden wanted to tell us some lies that would be an obvious one. Even if it's true I wouldn't want to restrict myself from lynching whoever I want to so it's irrelevant to me.
Question for everyone now. I know some of you have answered some or part of it but I want to get everyone to say something about the same topic:
What do you think of the setup, and do you believe anything Wooden claimed? What do you think the challenges will be for the town in the configuration you imagine and how will it affect your game?
I don't like speculating about game mechanisms. There's little point to me because I get confused easily with long ideas (as you should know yourself XD) and because I feel like we're not going to know the real answer by talking about a lot of possibilities, anyway. It's an interesting setup, but ultimately I don't want to hesitate to scumhunt or vote just because "this person might be fool". Similarly I don't want to rush a lynch that I don't mean just because "maybe the pacifist only needs two NLs". The Holy Hand Grenade X is probably true, just because Woody probably can't resist putting in a random overpowered ability like that into his game. And of course there's the point that Woody might be lying.
Suu~ I answered, can I get a pressie now?
im just going to consider everything as a possibility for now. i would like to believe that the pacifist thing is a lie though because otherwise all these mindless wagons are quite worrysome, even though i know that there isnt much else to do now as i dont have any strong suspects either…
for some reason i cant type capital letters or apostrophes now, sorry about that...
Okay, I am caught up.
About the setup, I don't really going to let it effect my play style, though if I had to guess, I'd say pretty much they all seem lie to me… Wooden hates fools, pacifist is a bitch role to give to someone, holy grenade is such a lousy name and I am pretty sure Wooden would have come up with something better if this was true... and the word thing, that one actually seems the most plausible to me.
I've never been an avid roleplayer and i actually never have truly done it in this game, would be a little silly to expect that from me now.
Okay, I am caught up.
About the setup, I don't really going to let it effect my play style, though if I had to guess, I'd say pretty much they all seem lie to me… Wooden hates fools, pacifist is a bitch role to give to someone, holy grenade is such a lousy name and I am pretty sure Wooden would have come up with something better if this was true… and the word thing, that one actually seems the most plausible to me.
Didn't you put 2 pacifists in your game?
Mechanics talk get us nowhere, either they're there or they are not. That's all.
This is such a flawed argument in so many ways. Bogart can defend himself but seriously Shushu, it sounds like you're fundamentally voting him for meta… after one post, not even half a day into the game. Mah eye is on ye!! :)
Well sorry if I don't want to see how many wagons we can get. This joking is not productive and I refuse to take part in it. I am voting someone on the principle that if I don't bring light to this instance, we could lose something vital. All you is one slip, and you can catch mafia in their tracks.
Bogart: after all this joking, who do have on your watch list?
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
Gruff gruff...
(silly fox...)
Votes in titles and spoiler tags will be ignored.
Please don't forget to 'unvote' or at least 'change vote lynch' when you do.
Thank you
~VOTE COUNT~
kmohyudin [1] : vorlianis.
Mastellow [1] : Maki707.
Kitsune Inferno [1] : TheManWithNoName.
Bogart [1] : Shuhan1288.
Jonfire97[1] : Mr. Habaneroo
Shuhan1288[1] : Koh.
Huschel [1] : Kitsune Inferno.
Foolio [1] : trappedolphin.
Not voting [9] : Gerri, kmohyudin, Foolio, Jonfire97, Waffles, Mastello, Harvady Alumnus, Bogart, Huschel.
Kinda disappointed that my votes didn't count. It was the perfect plan. I thought I'd have a lynch already. I am having such a good time.
Okay, let's see. I'm astounded that anyone would even suggest playing this with a straight face, let alone try. The moderator has implied that his word, nay- he himself is not to be trusted. Even if that statement alone is the only falsehood, it still makes the factors that the mod controls (i.e., everything but us) unproven, or worse, subject to change. God only knows what will happen at night.
Here's the thing- I'm not joking. I am really unopposed to breaking the game. Testing the boundaries in order to find them seems like a good start, and I endorse it. I'd much rather be the one to break it than get trapped by it later. In all likelihood, it probably is a clean and simple game. But a mod doesn't admit to lying in the setup for giggles. They're aiming for a much deeper, much more sadistic sort of giggles. Better safe than sorry.
…so for now, my main goal (besides my own enjoyment) is to not assume knowledge of anything- and I mean, anything_._ Not until I've seen it happen. I see today and I wonder- are they all making trouble? Yet I shouldn't be assuming that they are in the first place? Maybe they all know something I don't. Maybe I'm the one out of the loop. I can only guess that you all have some mod-given knowledge that you're getting these opinions and ideas from, especially since it came with the confidence that there isn't going to be a train wreck in the near future. People should start by giving out that, because I don't have anything like that. Or are we all acting on good faith? Because that would be pretty funny.
Anyway, how many hours do we have left?
I've never been an avid roleplayer and i actually never have truly done it in this game, would be a little silly to expect that from me now.
Eh? Yes you did.
What do you think of the setup, and do you believe anything Wooden claimed? What do you think the challenges will be for the town in the configuration you imagine and how will it affect your game?
Well, pacifist - we should'nt be no-lyncing anyway, besides maybe the first day, which won't end the game cause that would be silly.
Fool - well if we lynch him we lynch him. It should'nt end the game.
Hand grenade - meh. Someone will get a vig shot. We don't know what post it is so no point worrying about it.
Words=instant death. I hope that's not true. Up to 5 players being modkilled? Doubt it.
Oh, and as for pacifists he did say someone could have multiple win conditions. I only have one so I assume it's third party.
A pacifist Serial killer I bet. Just for irony.
_giggles, sadistically
24 hours left._
Didn't you put 2 pacifists in your game?
Yes, and I am not proud of it. Well… maybe I am a little bit; I mean I was rooting for Harvady pretty hard :( Broke my heart.
Oh, and as for pacifists he did say someone could have multiple win conditions. I only have one so I assume it's third party.
A pacifist Serial killer I bet. Just for irony.
This is in the opening post:
@Wooden:
Every win condition is quite simple, and by every I mean more than 2, which I will get to later.
So there are more than 2 win conditions in total in the game. It doesn't say that one player has more than 1. Or are you referring to something else?
Oh I thought it meant somebody had 2 possible win conditions.
Then there is no pacifist, it would be unrealistic for him to be able to win.
Pacifism isn't as hard as you think. Rather than imposing a neutral stance, the pacifist prefers indecision. No-Lynches don't need to be voted on to be achieved.
Also, a typical fool does end the game. There are always exceptions, but the very nature of role demands that we really not want to lynch the fool. Without that threat of losing, there's no reason to have a fool.
As it's been mentioned, we've been given conflicting statements by the moderator. There's nothing we can trust or distrust. Assume the worst, and play normal. The likelihood of the game ending on D1 is slim to none. We'll lynch.
Vote Lynch: kmohyudin
Bogart, your post kind of doesn't sit well with me. I read it three times and I still don't think you said anything. Sure sure, we don't know anything, we won't assume anything, whatever. Whether or not he's lying about those roles, we're not about to sit around not lynching. And we're not about to ignore suspicious people because "what if he's a fool," are we? I don't see what's got you going "oh noez!" so much.
Vote lynch: Bogart
~VOTE COUNT~
kmohyudin [2] : vorlianis, Harvady Alumnus.
Mastellow [1] : Maki707.
Kitsune Inferno [1] : TheManWithNoName.
Bogart [2] : Shuhan1288, Foolio.
Jonfire97[1] : Mr. Habaneroo
Shuhan1288[1] : Koh.
Huschel [1] : Kitsune Inferno.
Foolio [1] : trappedolphin.
Not voting [7] : Gerri, kmohyudin, Jonfire97, Waffles, Mastello, Bogart, Huschel.
Bogart… I read your post several times and I still don't know what you're trying to say. It sounds like you say "anything could be real, let's test and see what happens even if it breaks the game" and then "I'm going to ignore everything the setup says and just play normally", which seems contradictory. And ultimately I feel like there isn't really anything significant; you just went in circles.
Then again, I could just be really confuzzled.
Am I the only one who's tired of speculating about the game mechanism already…?
Another point I have, since you say yourself that you are not joking about lynching Wooden, almost proves you want to derail us from moving forward Bogart…
I can't speak for anybody else, but I for one am conducting business as if it were a normal game, which ten to one it is. If something strange happens, oh well, that is the only way we will find out. And so you want to endorse a vote against Wooden. Not only is that a waste of time, but that is completely out of character for you. Lynching the mod won't get maf, it will give them a free night to kill, therefore if you don't have anyone else more suited for a target, get out of the town's way.
Bogart,I'll ask again. Other than Wooden, who do you suspect?
Trapped, the point of asking wasn't to actually collectively consider or decide what the rules are. It was to see what people said, because if anyone is feigning confusion there might be clues. And I don't know if Bogart meant me when he mentioned being serious but he sure gave me an interesting post to look at.
yeah bogart i can see where you are comming from but i dont think it would be worth the risk or anything like that
Trapped, the point of asking wasn't to actually collectively consider or decide what the rules are. It was to see what people said, because if anyone is feigning confusion there might be clues. And I don't know if Bogart meant me when he mentioned being serious but he sure gave me an interesting post to look at.
Oh, okay then. That makes sense :) Sorry if I made you explain too early, though. :<
Suu~ So where's my pressie!
I'm simply taking a position on a topic. Let me spell it out. If we were asked to choose between the options "Breaking Game" or "Trusting Game", I would choose "Breaking Game". You can "vote" without "campaigning", you know. It simply sounds petty because you can get what you want without putting yourself out there- it's a bit contradictory, but it makes sense. Even the implied risks could be fake, etc. etc., Proven actions (making trouble) are preferable to unproven words (empty speculation), etc. etc. "Do whatever you want because of setup" is separate of the main point. That's just a report on what I'm doing.
Having me lay things out for everyone defeats the purpose of the wording I use in the first place. People like to decide things for themselves- I won't get in the way of that. Even if it's about my own thoughts or motives. That's Mafia. It's like what they say about people knowing you better than you know yourself. Maybe they do. It's not like my stimuli have triggered response, but I'm not going to be fussy. I'm used to it. Sometimes subtlety is worth being ignored. It's like a filter :D Anyway, there should be a wagon already. Pile on somebody and get to it.
Bogart is clearly mafia. Get himz,
Change Vote Lynch: Bogart
Alright there is something up with Bogart and im preety sure he has a posting restriction of some kind as his title is different each time so
Unvote
Vote Lynch: Bogart
Well Bogart you did say you wanted there to be a wagon and everybody jump on it, just fulfilling your wishes brother.
Vote Lynch: Bogart
I don't have much time to give all my thoughts atm but guys, please don't hammer until Bogie claims (if he wants to; if he insists against it then nevermind). We have about 9 hours left I believe.
I really would claim, but people will get mad. The more serious they were about this whole thing the more mad they will be. But I'm just fine- by all means, come at me. I endorse it :D I'm interested to see what I flip as.
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
I see you, Old Hab. Get that throwaway vote of yours onto someone who really matters.
Guys
Guys…
Guys!
GUYS!
Ahem...
After lynching Bogart who is obviously not town and prolly maf, we should get Foolio. Because the chances of being the fool are significantly less than anyone else and it'd be a safe lynch and he's prolly not town.
I don't wanna lynch Bogart D:
I never actually did enjoy roleplaying Maki, when i did it it wasn't for long.
And i decided to pile on the pig. Unvote Vote lynch: Kitsune Inferno
I dunno what Kitsu is smoking but that was a fast wagon jump. And wouldn't it be a bit silly to assume any role probability based on user name? Haha. If anything I hope Bogart isn't a fool. But sadly, I really want to lynch him now. He's the kind of guy I like to keep around but right now he's just talking himself into a spiral of rhetoric.
If I'm not lynched by the end of the day, I will be severely disappointed.
… Is it just me or is Bogart sounding more like a fool.
Or he could be mafia faking it.
.........
Dear present and future mods, this is why you don't put Fools in :<
Can we have a votecount? I believe there's about one hour plus left?
If I'm not lynched by the end of the day, I will be severely disappointed.
Are you a fool?
I'm kind of wary of lynching Bogart now, but his behavior can't really be ignored either, and I want to know what kind of game he is playing here.
Vote lynch: Bogart
I'll laugh if this becomes the shortest game ever…
Did a quick count, six votes on Bogart so far I think.
Only way to know for sure is to vote him out… He obviously does not want to share...
I'm fine with lynching Bogart. If Wooden's awesome game ends prematurely he can only blame himself.
Vote Lynch: Bogart
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
Oh, only one more to hammer, right?
9 votes to lynch, so 2 more I guess. If it ends here I will laugh so hard. Definitely a shoo-in for whichever category it ends up in for the next Awards XD
More seriously: I see Gerri, I'd like to hear him speak first at least before I vote.
Suu~
~VOTE COUNT~
kmohyudin [1] : Harvady Alumnus.
Mastellow [1] : Maki707.
Kitsune Inferno [2] : TheManWithNoName, vorlianis.
Bogart [7] : Shuhan1288, Foolio, Kitsune Inferno, Koh, Waffles, Mastello, Huschel.
Jonfire97[1] : Mr. Habaneroo
Foolio [1] : trappedolphin.
Not voting [4] : Gerri, kmohyudin, Jonfire97, Bogart.
2 hours, 12 minutes left~
I see a sign of death over Bogart.
vote lynch: Bogart
Suu~ I should resist, but I just can't~!
Vote lynch: Bogart
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
Oh wait.
**Unvote
Vote lynch: Bogart**
A lynch was achieved.
Please procede to the execution room in silence.
The execution will begin shortly…
There's an execution room? :O
Suu~ :cwy:
duct tapes Trappy's mouth
bahaha, it worked!
Please bear with me while I try to do a writeup while driving.
Wooden, I don't want you to do a write-up while driving. However, since you said earlier that that's what you intend to do, now I'm worried that something might have happened to you.