"Such sexual arousal may not lead to an actual sexual activity, beyond a mental arousal. In a 2004 study at Northwestern University, the female participants (both heterosexual and homosexual women) became sexually aroused when they viewed straight as well as lesbian erotic films. Among the male participants, however, the heterosexual men were turned on only by erotic films showing women; the gay males were aroused only by films showing men. The study's senior researcher said that women's sexual desire is less rigidly directed toward a particular gender, as compared with men's; and women's desire is more changeable over time."
This refutes your attitude moron.
This study in no way reflects the sociological aspect of more pressure toward males to stay rigidly within masculinity, which would heavily effect studies of this sort. The sort of behavior YOU are spewing left and right.
Modern theories are changing toward the idea that humanity in general has bisexual tendencies. Male animals show this plenty.
This also fails to take in the fact that people of both genders are bombarded with female sexuality from childhood, while barely hit with male sexuality. This would effect the study as well.
"Archaeological evidence of swastika-shaped ornaments dates from the Neolithic period. It occurs mainly in the modern day culture of India, sometimes as a geometrical motif and sometimes as a religious symbol. It remains widely used in Eastern religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism."
Name a single example that isn't Nazi iconography.
What you just posted is absolutely irrelevant to what you quoted.
Unless you're retarded enough to think the legislation hates ancient eastern swazitikas, and not the association they bring to Nazi iconography thanks to Hitler.
Not liking Mr. 2's wardrobe is making me homophobic gay basher HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Thinking it's sexual and child corrupting, and should be legislated against? Yeah it does.
ok then, I'm one, according to your absolutely retarded logic, which you need to resort to in order to say something so you can look "right", even tho this wasn't the main topic we discussed, these are things you said absolutely random and we started discussing it. As I already said 3 times - I don't give a shit about what you blame me for, as long as you can prove me wrong. And you're not doing it. When I give argument you simply say "there is no harm", well PROVE IT. Just because you CAN'T, you prefer to blame me for something.
You're the one making the claim that it's harmful. Debate does not work the way you think it does.
The one who puts the idea forth in the first place must substantiate the threat they are saying exists. Before anyone attempts to refute it.
Asking the refuter to go first is asking them to refute air.
The threat needs to have an attempted substantiation before anyone tries to show it is nonexistant.
So, yeah, thanks for reminding me.
Prove clothes like Mr.2's are a threat. Cite or concede bitch.
[qimg]http://gbatemp.net/style_emoticons/default/rofl2.gif[/qimg] Or send him to Folsom Street. You're one of those "shit parents" Rin was talking about. Do you even fucking know what puberty means?
So are you denying what I said about child sexuality?
The only point I was trying to make is that your paranoia about kids seeing bathing suits, which they see at the beach anyway, is not going to destroy them and lead to premature adulthood.
Nor would a man wearing swans and a ballerina outfit have ANYTHING to do with this.
Also, cite a real source and not wikipedia. If it has legit links, link THEM.
And at this point it seems you're not even caring about gay clothing. What you linked to has to do with ANY sexual persuasion or either gender.
Which then means you must hate what Nami, (especially) Franky, Luffy, and Robin wear.
Do you? Or do you not?
Puberty - puberatum - age of maturity, man hood. This word is there FOR A REASON which you're too "incapable of comprehending".
Are you denying child sexuality existing?
Section 6 of the Criminal Law (Consolidation)(Scotland) Act 1995 makes it an offence to show any lewd, indecent or libidinous behaviour towards a girl who is between the age of 12 and 16. If the female is under the age of 12, it would revert to the common law offence.
Mr. 2 does none of this.
And whats your point founded on? Lol you just like to say random stuffs dont you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_impact_of_thong_underwear
So you hate Franky's outfit then. Heterosexual Franky.
Because Mr. 2, the gay, is not wearing a thong. He is wearing a giant onion shaped tutu that more then covers the very existence of genitalia.
It is not.
Explain how not allowing men to wear feminine clothing isn't discrimination.
Why are you rephrasing me? And yes, these things were destroyed with votes and the changing minds of people towards the problem. There is no way that 1 will want it and 1 billion not, and that the 1 will change it by himself, so the 1 billion can adopt to it.
Tell that to Mississippi when the government forced school integration.
Here you contradict yourself. The change in society is beginning in change with people's thoughts. It doesn't appear from nowhere lol.[/quote
What does that contradict.
Well, you probably dress like Mr. 2 I guess.
In discreet unsexual, albiet goofy clothing?
Is there a study somewhere about the harmful effect of goofy bad fashion being harmful on children's minds?
Please link to it, because all of this stuff about sexual thongs is not only completely irrelevant to Mr.2, but also is heterosexual as much as it is gay.
I'm cornered? Haha, I can keep doing this stuff for ages and noone ever can prove me for wrong.
You already have been on multiple accounts.
You're already making faux retreats, you're stamina is already dying. Don't flatter yourself and think you can outlast me. We haven't even started next to the China thread. And you hold no candle to Phenomonyl in terms of stamina.I ask, why were the free hugs banned? The saggers? Why can't a gay himself take a clothing like Mr. 2 for offensive? No answer.
Why would they? Why should anyone for that matter?
Just babbling around how much of an evil demon I am, cuz I don't like Mr. 2s clothes and think they are inappropriate for society.
You're stupid, arrogant, ignorant, bigoted, and stubborn as a mule sitting in a mud puddle. No one ever said evil.