Okay, read up!
@Foolio:
@SUDK, …You were one of two people not to put a lynch vote down on D2, despite thinking there was a lone mafia and agreeing it was a good idea to pursue a lynch. Was another no-lynch preferred to you over picking between targets you didn't particularly suspect?
@Foolio:
I do see now that you said both Jabberwok and Shinobu seemed "fairly town" to you. But a lot has happened since then; do you still feel the same? If you support a lynch despite having no real suspects, would you be willing to jump on one of the wagons despite not suspecting anyone?
Of course I wouldn't vote for someone I think it town, just to push it through. I understand that I should trust my fellow towns, but if I can't see what you see in them, I'm not going to go along with it. Even if I had showed up in time yesterday, I wouldn't have voted for either candidate.
@Wooden_Giraffe:
Space switching his vote to him tells me that they most certainly were not working together. Knowing what Space is now makes it very clear that he was following a common mafia strategy of being against the biggest suspect of the day(that he knows isn't mafia), but willing to target if necessary. That way he can get the lynch in and still say "I told you so". Of course this doesn't mean that Jabs is innocent.
I'm sorry, I don't follow. Not saying you're wrong or anything, just don't understand what you're saying.
@Foolio:
@SUDK and Jabberwok If you believe there's only 1 mafia then you shouldn't have qualms about a lynch today, but I haven't seen much from you two by way of pursuing that.
Jabberwok, last time you weighed in you said you'd lost confidence in your suspicion of Shinobu. Thoughts now?
SUDK, I honestly have almost no idea where you stand on anything or anyone. At the very minimum, can you weigh in on the two active wagons?
This post ticks me off a little, as it all but outright shows that you just ignored posts from the both of us. Both of us had weighed in on these matters previously. You might have a legitimate reason, but the comment just kind of hit me the wrong way.
@Jabberwok:
That would hardly line up with my theory of 5/1/1, which was pretty much the first post of substance once the game had started. Raising the possibility first thing is the exact opposite of lying low. For that reason, I'm curious to hear SUDK's read on last night's events; they were the only person to never even acknowledge the possibility of 5/1/1.
@Foolio:
@SUDK, according to what you said at the beginning of the game you should be able to be more active now, right? Please give your take on the situation.
Last night made me read through the game in a new light, which has given me a suspect.
My biggest suspect is Jabberwok. In the event Jabberwok is innocent, then Foolio becomes my big suspect. I trust Foolio until then, however.
@SpaceCowboy:
**Vote Lynch: Shinobu Mahara
I don't have tons of time right now, and I'll complete this later with some quotes, but I want people that glance at this right now to have my opinion.
I'm not a fan of what Shinobu's doing right now, even more than Jabber's.
If I considered Jabber's claim to be reckless,than Shinobu's even worse.
She got in the way of an interrogation (Foolio's to Jabber's) and took Jabber's side. While I am generally fine with someone taking the side of other person that he/she considers to be a townie, I don't like when they do it when someone is getting pressured to speak. It simply creates argumments for the person that is being questioned to use, even if they didn't though about them initially.
In this case, it gave Jabber's some leeway since he knows he has someone on his side.
This isn't the biggest problem though. I'm not going to vote for someone just because his playstyle is different from mine.
Jabber's claim was reckless and I believe we can all agree with that.
Someone that takes his side is bound to be one of 2:
- Either another person that can relate to Jabber, in this case, a vanilla townie or,
- A mafia, since it's pretty common for a mafia to take the side of someone he/she knows for sure is town. If that person gets lynched, it's easy for the mafia to say that he was on his side and refused to lynch him.
So Jabber getting lynched and flipping town:
- Wouldn't tell us if Shinobu is a town;
- Wouldn't tell us if Shinobu is a mafia.
While Shinobu getting lynhced and flipping town:
- Would confirm Jabber's position.
While she flipping mafia:
- Would still leave us room to work and try to realize Jabber's alligment.**
This, and the following defense of this, really make me think that Space was trying to exhonorate Jabberwok. The push for Shinobu's lynch (which Jabberwok later agreed with, but we'll get to that) would not only get rid of a town (at the potential cost of Space's life), but would ensure that a Mafia would get out scot-free. Foolio got in the way there, but at least some people would still follow this logic. Jabberwok would've been in a much better position here.
In fact, Jabberwok started pursuing Shinobu, too, being the second vote on him. He started outwardly agreeing with everything Foolio was saying about Shinobu, and even Foolio mentioned that he (Jabberwok) stopped commenting on his pursuit. It was like both of them started going after Shinobu, going after the most likely bandwagon.
Jabberwok was even called out for turning on Shinobu, after mentioning that he was "less confident" in pursuing him after he defended him.
The reason I suspect Foolio if Jabberwok is innocent is that Foolio's pursuit of Jabberwok almost completely stopped when Space jumped in, almost like they were tag-teaming him. This is a really weak argument, though, so that's why I trust Foolio for now.
Actually writing this out it sounds like a tinfoil-hat theory, but still.
@Everyone/Shuhan: Can the Mafia kill a Mafia at night?
I believe that there is no third party at this time, but that may change in regards to the answer to that question.