@sanji499:
Maybe people will want more realistic sensations in the future.
Relax man. Maybe, I am over dramatic and too pessimistic.
I recently saw a photo of people receiving Halo 3 first. i was kind of freaked out by their faces.
It seems that people tend to want more beautiful games every time but to what extent. They want more realistic games more physical sensation.
The question "Where is the border that video game must not reach"
How can a game be more realist than reality itself.
As you say. If it is fun and entertaining. that is ok.
I congragulate you to take Video games not seriously and doing for the fun of it.
That is the most important.
Uhh Halo 3 is and never was an imitation of photo-realism and never tried to reach that realism, it had ok graphics not the best and it's a good example of GAMEPLAY>GRAPHICS in a non-Wii game.
That is not the whole story. Later, 10 of others players were crouching on my dead character body as if they were raping me.
It's called teabagging which I think originated from Halo 2. Or, atleast, was perfected in Halo 2 Lol.
IMO all games are casual and those with online capability can be seen as casual or hardcore depending on the player. If he's a pretentious self-important brat who focuses solely on putting down people online and playing "professionally" (MLG, they actually make money but about 50% are the fake pros, and the fake pros PRETEND to be MLG players but are just a bunch of little bitches) he thinks of himself as hardcore when in fact he's just another one of the 10000000 douchebags playing online either on PC, LIVE, or PSN.
All games with online capability will have their share of "hardcore" gamers and casual gamers, mostly casual.