I guess destroying Drum Kingdom isn't an evil enough deed, Blackbeard. Try again but this time, do it on-panel.
Most Despicable Villain(s) so far…
-
-
@Uncle:
I guess destroying Drum Kingdom isn't an evil enough deed, Blackbeard. Try again but this time, do it on-panel.
Well, he rampaged over there, just like he rampaged over Banaro Island. But as far as we know, he wasn't killing innocent people left and right, just scaring them off, robbing them and destroying their houses.
I mean, Dalton opposed them and he was left alive (beaten, but alive), right? There was no one else to defend the kingdom, because Wapol run away with all the medics and guards, and yet the people seemed fine after the fact. There was no decimated populace or hundreds needing immediate medical attention.
At this moment, Blackbeard seems like a very ruthless guy. He decides to rampage over your town, you better move and wait for him to go away. However, he doesn't seem to be the kind of man that will go out of his way to murder, enslave or torture people, nor does his plans involve bombs that will decimate two armies in the middle of a civil war created by him. If you are not in his way, he will just ignore you. The simple fact that there were other level 6 survivors indicate that he did not even bother to see if some of the defeated were just faking.
That's the vibe I got from him so far. It's different from the abusive acts of Wapol or the murderous intent of Lucci. It's very different from what the Tenryuubito or Spandam do.
While Blackbeard is a terrible evil person, his evil acts are not so widespread and harmful to innocents as some of the others in my list.
Of course, now that he got his way and became one of the most powerful pirates in the world, things may change.
-
How about Shiryuu, Deicide? That guy killed people for lulz. And used human blood to feed his sword. A psycho killer.
I would put Lucci higher than Akainu. Lucci killed because he liked, that is the reason he joined CP9. Akainu killed innocent for a cause, but Lucci killed hundreds of soldier for his own belief. Unlike Shiryuu, Lucci tried to find a reason to justify his action of killing for sheer pleasure. -
@The:
How about Shiryuu Deicide? That guy killed people for lulz. And used human blood to feed his sword. A psycho killer.
I would ut Lucci higher than Akainu. Lucci killed because he liked, that is the reason he joined CP9. Akainu killed innocent for a cause, but Lucci killed hundreds of soldier for his own belief.I didn't think about Shiryuu, to be fair. Yes, he'd be higher in my rank, I just didn't remember him. I was considering only main villains (I considered Mr. 3 a "main" because there was an arc with him as the main villain).
I'll edit my post to include Shiryuu. Does anyone else have another suggestion?
(Thinking about secondary villains, I'll also include Ohm… the guy was pretty evil)
Edited my rank including Shiryuu (#7) and Ohm (#8). Any more suggestions?
-
Buggy: He is about as cruel as Empereor Pilaf off of Dragonball. He seemed threatening at first, but after you see him hes just silly.
Kuro: One of the first villains to be fucked in the head. He had no remorse when he attempted to ravage Kaya's village, and after having a wonderful relationship with Kaya. He was like a second father to Kaya, and Kuro doesn't even feel anything with his adventures with Kaya. He truly is a monster.
Don Krieg: Hes pretty evil. I love how he shows up with a marine flag in villages, only to show them that its really Don Krieg and hes come to rape everybody. His fight with Luffy is one of the most epic fights in the East Blue Saga.
Arlong: He shot a lady right in front of her two step daughters eyes, and had one of the two step daughters as a slave. Not to mention he ran villages under a dictatorship.
-
Buggy: He is about as cruel as Empereor Pilaf off of Dragonball. He seemed threatening at first, but after you see him hes just silly.
Kuro: One of the first villains to be fucked in the head. He had no remorse when he attempted to ravage Kaya's village, and after having a wonderful relationship with Kaya. He was like a second father to Kaya, and Kuro doesn't even feel anything with his adventures with Kaya. He truly is a monster.
Don Krieg: Hes pretty evil. I love how he shows up with a marine flag in villages, only to show them that its really Don Krieg and hes come to rape everybody. His fight with Luffy is one of the most epic fights in the East Blue Saga.
Arlong: He shot a lady right in front of her two step daughters eyes, and had one of the two step daughters as a slave. Not to mention he ran villages under a dictatorship.
Kuro! I forgot to add him as well! I edited my rank with him. Oddly enough, the Captain of the Black Cat Pirates ended up in the 13th position!
-
Well, I think that the whole Blackbeard's crew can find a place for them in your list, when their pasts are revealed. Level 6 prisoners are infamous for their incredible cruelty and madness. Mr.3, Don Krieg, Wapol are just small fries, and will look like innocent sheeps scared shitless in comparison to those guys.
-
@The:
Well, I think that the whole Blackbeard's crew can find a place for them in your list, when their past are revealed. Level 6 prisoners are infamous for their incredible cruelty. Mr.3, Don Krieg, Wapol are just small fries, and will look like saints compared to those guys.
Oh, I bet that also. Plus, there's DoFlamingo and his slasher smile waiting to enter the list as well..
And I think sooner or later Blackbeard himself will kick, rape and murder the dog and gain a very high rank as well.
-
Actually in OP world killing isn't that big of a problem like in our world. It's a world where people kill each other everyday. Saul sank 6 ships with hundreds (or thousands) of marine soldiers to protect a girl. And yes, from reader's view, that's not cruel. Justice depends on where you stand.
Roger killed the whole Squardo's crew. Yet Whitebeard was having a drink with him while poor little Squardo knew nothing. They are all pirates, and pirates are villains, in common sense. I bet that Roger didn't give a fuck about the world, he just wanted to do as he pleased, a pirate's freedom. Who cares if he killed half of Shiki's fleet? -
@The:
Actually in OP world killing isn't that big of a problem like in our world. It's a world where people kill each other everyday. Saul sank 6 ships with hundreds (or thousands) of marine soldiers to protect a girl. And yes, from reader's view, that's not cruel. Justice depends on where you stand.
Roger killed the whole Squardo's crew. Yet Whitebeard was having a drink with him while poor little Squardo knew nothing. They are all pirates, and pirates are villains, in common sense. I bet that Roger didn't give a fuck about the world, he just wanted to do as he pleased, a pirate's freedom. Who cares if he killed half of Shiki's fleet?The reason behind killing defines the act. To kill to protect a friend is one thing; to just murder an innocent person is another.
Saul throwing those ships? He was not really thinking about killing. He wasn't going to later search survivors and murder them all. And, in the world of One Piece, I bet most sailors survive when their massive ships are thrown by a giant.
Now, guys like Shiryuu or Rob Lucci are murderers. They do what they do with killing intent, without mercy. It doesn't matter if the target is helpless or willing to surrender.
-
Saul throwing those ships? He was not really thinking about killing.
That mean he didn't care about their lives. Yes, like I said, Roger didn't give a fuck about the world. Luffy woudn't care if Lucci fell into the ocean and died when he first used gear third. Robin wouldn't care if the world is destroyed. They just don't care about innocent people that they don't know.
Akainu kills because he think it's a right thing to do. Sacrificing some people for greater good. Punishing the evildoers for people in the world.What makes Roger a good guy and Akainu a villain? When they both kill (a lot), and don't think what they do is wrong?
Akainu is just an antagonist. Roger, is one of the protagonists. -
@The:
That mean he didn't care about their lives.
He was defending himself and a young girl. It was not like he just saw the ships and said "Oh, let's see how far I can throw them!".
Yes, like I said, Roger didn't give a fuck about the world.
Akainu kills because he think it's a right thing to do. Sacrificing some people for greater good. Punishing the evildoers for people in the world.
What makes Roger a good guy and Akainu a villain? When they both kill, and don't think what they do is wrong?
Akainu is just an antagonist. Toger, is one of the protagonist.I can't say about Roger, since we know next to nothing about him. But Akainu will kill innocent people just because he suspects there might be a villain among them. The fact that he destroyed a ship full of innocents just because there was a small chance of a criminal being among them is a major evil act.
-
He was defending himself and a young girl. It was not like he just saw the ships and said "Oh, let's see how far I can throw them!".
I mean, he doesn't want to kill, but he doesn't care either if he has to kill. In that case.
I can't say about Roger, since we know next to nothing about him. But Akainu will kill innocent people just because he suspects there might be a villain among them. The fact that he destroyed a ship full of innocents just because there was a small chance of a criminal being among them is a major evil act.
Yes, the fact is, he didn't care about the lives of those innocent people. The same can be said for many "good guys" in OP.
Robin, for example, doesn't care if all people in the world get killed, except for the straw hats."Not care if people die" and "want people to die" are two different things. Akainu is the former, Lucci is the latter. That is why I put Lucci higher than Akainu.
Akainu is ruthless. Lucci is ruthless and psychotic.
Whitebeard wants to save Ace, and he doesn't care if innocent marines/people die when they get in his way (who care if his quake killed Coby who was crying and running and not wanting to kill him?). Same for Akainu, he wants to eliminate villains, and doesn't care if he has to kill innocent people who get in his way. The different is, Whitebeard kills for his sons. Akainu kills for people in the world, for greater good (let's assume so).
Whitebeard's motive is more selfish. But that's what awesome about One Piece. Pirates don't care about innocent lives when they want to achieve their goals. They fight for the people they love, and don't give a fuck about whether the people they don't know die or not.
-
as i said your all just being stupid Boa hancock is keeping an island of women to herself there's no way she isn't the most evil character.
-
as i said your all just being stupid Boa hancock is keeping an island of women to herself there's no way she isn't the most evil character.
Nope. Hancock is most despicable:ninja:, in that case, but not evil. Evil and good… only exist in human mind. **** it, no philosophy here.
This thread is about despicable, which I think is the best term. And yet people vote with "most evil" in their head. Akainu didn't kill those civilians because he wanted them to die, he killed them because he wanted the villains to die (scholars are villains, according to what he had been told). Lucci, in other hand, kills because he likes, because he wants the victims dead. And look at the poll.
How about Hancock, Deicide? She uses her beauty as an excuse to kill innocent (as she said) and didn't care if Marguerite died. I bet that she killed many marine fodders in the war. And, yes, Kuja crew robs, and pillages, and their victims, or more exactly, Hancock's victims, who were innocent, were all petrified, and never return to be human. She kills anyone who sees her back, without hesitation, which is selfish.
And yes, in my opinion, she is not despicable.
Akainu is not despicable, too. He struggles for justice, he sins for the sake of people in the world, he fights for what he believes, and stands up for what's right in his ideal. That is... admirable.:ninja::ninja::ninja:
@Darkstorm:Akainu is a Hero of Justice.
–----------
I feel sick now, and will go to sleep.:ninja:
-
@The:
Akainu is not despicable, too. He struggles for justice, he sins for the sake of people in the world, he fights for what he believes, and stands up for what's right in his ideal. That is… admirable.:ninja::ninja::ninja:
Killing the first person who questions you without a second thought (I attribute the "I have no regrets" bubble to both Aka and Coby), showing all in all not a goddamn lick of loyalty to his men, only to his extreme sense of JUSTICE, destroying a boat full of civilians on a hunch, and generally being a dick should qualify you for being despicable.
Then again, Crocodile has nearly the same resume, but he had the sense not to kill subordinates while they were useful, so…
-
@Cyan:
Killing the first person who questions you without a second thought (I attribute the "I have no regrets" bubble to both Aka and Coby), showing all in all not a goddamn lick of loyalty to his men, only to his extreme sense of JUSTICE, destroying a boat full of civilians on a hunch, and generally being a dick should qualify you for being despicable.
–----
I wasn't that serious, mate.
–-
Akainu despises cowardice and selfishness.:ninja: Sacrificing yourself for justice by getting magma fisted is more of a good deed than running away.:ninja:
jk -
@The:
Nope. Hancock is most despicable:ninja:, in that case, but not evil. Evil and good… only exist in human mind. **** it, no philosophy here.
This thread is about despicable, which I think is the best term. And yet people vote with "most evil" in their head. Akainu didn't kill those civilians because he wanted them to die, he killed them because he wanted the villains to die (scholars are villains, according to what he had been told). Lucci, in other hand, kills because he likes, because he wants the victims dead. And look at the poll.
How about Hancock, Deicide? She uses her beauty as an excuse to kill innocent (as she said) and didn't care if Marguerite died. I bet that she killed many marine fodders in the war. And, yes, Kuja crew robs, and pillages, and their victims, or more exactly, Hancock's victims, who were innocent, were all petrified, and never return to be human. She kills anyone who sees her back, without hesitation, which is selfish.
And yes, in my opinion, she is not despicable.
Akainu is not despicable, too. He struggles for justice, he sins for the sake of people in the world, he fights for what he believes, and stands up for what's right in his ideal. That is... admirable.:ninja::ninja::ninja:
I feel sick now, and will go to sleep.:ninja:
funny how you are a hypocrite in the same quote.
Hancock follows her islands rules and killing those who are responsible for breaking them by letting a man in.
Aikanu kills a ship full of civilians because there is a possibility of an evil being on the ship.
Yet Hancock is evil for doing what something that happened and is 100% true and can't be a what if. Aikanu is not evil, yet he killed civilians who were completely innocent on the per chance that there MAY be an evil on the ship.
-
funny how you are a hypocrite in the same quote.
Hancock follows her islands rules and killing those who are responsible for breaking them by letting a man in.
Aikanu kills a ship full of civilians because there is a possibility of an evil being on the ship.
Yet Hancock is evil for doing what something that happened and is 100% true and can't be a what if. Aikanu is not evil, yet he killed civilians who were completely innocent on the per chance that there MAY be an evil on the ship.
I never said Hancock is evil or Akainu isn't evil, buddy.
These terms, depend on human belief.Hancock turns many innocent people to stones when she robs too.
Try to view things from Akainu's angle. What if an evil scholar got away? He would revive the ancient weapon and more innocent people would die, as Akainu believed. No one denies that Akainu is ruthless. -
@The:
Hancock turns many innocent people to stones when she robs too.
They were lusting. Hardly innocent.
^ This is essentially the logic behind justifying Absolute Justice.
-
@Cyan:
They were lusting
So will you.:ninja:
There is nothing such as justice and evil; thinking makes it so, my pal. :ninja: -
@Cyan:
They were lusting. Hardly innocent.
^ This is essentially the logic behind justifying Absolute Justice.
ha yea, lust is a SIN right, lol
but who really cares, everyone will have despicable in different light and you never can know. Like Aikanu, yes what he did to that ship, I could never do.
but how many times does it happen in stories where the good guys save and let a whole group of people live. may only be a few people, but what usually always happens then in that situation. ONE of those that they save betrays them and kills someone we really like or sells them out ot the bad guy or authority and many die or whatever.
All would have been averted if just killed them. But then also in same sense, how many times is it that someone really awesome is in tha tgroup that joins up with the good guys and does many good for them.
Hancock you say petrifies marine ships for example. Well she is a pirate, marines come you fight. no different than when marines come for strawhats. just her fruit happens to be a kind of kill move. would she be less evil if she had the rubber fruit instead and they were knocked out instead of petrified? did she become evil because she got that fruit?
-
As I remmber Hancock robs merchandise ships too.
I will check later.
–-
Well, Hancock was Shichibukai since her first campaign. And there is rumors about Kuja demon turning people into stones. Of course they are not marines, because she is Shichibukai.
I will find more informations. -
Oh, no. No way.
I won't be dragged again into useless discussion that will quickly derail the topic. This kind of thing already forced the moderators to close the Next Nakama thread, and that was my favorite thread. I won't make the same mistake here.
So, if you don't agree with my rank, you may ask me why, you may suggest changes, you may post your own rank. But I won't discuss what's more or less evil here. There's no way people will agree with each other.
-
i do'nt want to get into who is evil and who is not and fight over each little detail. hancock i'm sure robbed marine ships, civilian ships, merchant ships and who knows what else.
but luffy and crew also robbed from innocent people too. or did you forget skypiea. they robbed all that gold. and don't say shit like it was in a snake and anything else. It was the intention that matters. They sneakily did it without wanting them to know and ran off. when they saw them coming they assumed they found out and escaped as quick as possible. They clearly thought they were stealing, so it doesn't matter if it was or not.
-
HANCOCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
i do'nt want to get into who is evil and who is not and fight over each little detail. hancock i'm sure robbed marine ships, civilian ships, merchant ships and who knows what else.
but luffy and crew also robbed from innocent people too. or did you forget skypiea. they robbed all that gold. and don't say shit like it was in a snake and anything else. It was the intention that matters. They sneakily did it without wanting them to know and ran off. when they saw them coming they assumed they found out and escaped as quick as possible. They clearly thought they were stealing, so it doesn't matter if it was or not.
Hancock robbed, and killed innocent:
http://www.onemanga.com/One_Piece/516/14/"I have heard story about ships that was attacked by the Kuja pirates…how they were discovered later, drifting out at sea...with no living souls on board, only a collection of strange stone statues".
-
@The:
Hancock robbed, and killed innocent:
http://www.onemanga.com/One_Piece/516/14/i know that. but like i said, she robbed people. luffy and crew robs people.
her fruit just happens to kill them or petrify to be more specific. is she evil cause she got that fruit?
and this is who someone finds despicable, not who you think is evil or not. i find hancock just as evil as any strawhat.
if you want to see evil look at Deicide's list. Looking at that I completely forgot how evil mr. 3 really is. I mean wow is his candle cake evil. He is doing this petrification for his OWN PLEASURE and makes the suffering last.
edit: oh and they aren't dead. she coudl find them later and unpetrify them. i know that won't happen, but just saying. and i'm off to watch some 449 courtesy of funimation
-
Since this is not about "who's eviler", I'll say my opinion:
@The:
Hancock robbed, and killed innocent:
http://www.onemanga.com/One_Piece/516/14/"I have heard story about ships that was attacked by the Kuja pirates…how they were discovered later, drifting out at sea...with no living souls on board, only a collection of strange stones statues".
The marine states it clearly as rumor.
I'm not saying Hancock did not attack merchant ships. The kuja clearly do it all the time. The problem is saying they're dead. They're petrified and may come back to life. We don't know enough about her ability in order to say if the process is permanent or can't be reversed by some random way (like dipping or being sprayed by sea water or whatever).
If the process is irreversible or not easily reversible, then Hancock did pretty evil things indeed. If it's not permanent or can easily or naturally be reversed, then Hancock may be actually sparing a lot of lives (so long as the process reverts before the Grand Line itself destroys the ship…).
The only truly and unquestionable evil act Hancock did was trying to kill Margaret and the others. Even then, she had the law on her side, thought it was a pretty evil act.
I know people will say bullshit like "It's clear this is irreversible" or "you're biased, Hancock fanboy" or whatever. It's just that Hancock has been shown to not be so evil as she appears to be, so I wouldn't doubt Oda pulling an "Author's Saving Throw" on her petrifying ability.
-
I am biased. Everyone is biased, not matter how we try to be impartial. I like Hancock, and yes, who cares if she killed fodders? I stated that I don't think she's despicable.
One thing I want to say, we are reading a pirates manga.
-
Since this is not about "who's eviler", I'll say my opinion:
The marine states it clearly as rumor.
I'm not saying Hancock did not attack merchant ships. The kuja clearly do it all the time. The problem is saying they're dead. They're petrified and may come back to life. We don't know enough about her ability in order to say if the process is permanent or can't be reversed by some random way (like dipping or being sprayed by sea water or whatever).
If the process is irreversible or not easily reversible, then Hancock did pretty evil things indeed. If it's not permanent or can easily or naturally be reversed, then Hancock may be actually sparing a lot of lives (so long as the process reverts before the Grand Line itself destroys the ship…).
The only truly and unquestionable evil act Hancock did was trying to kill Margaret and the others. Even then, she had the law on her side, thought it was a pretty evil act.
I know people will say bullshit like "It's clear this is irreversible" or "you're biased, Hancock fanboy" or whatever. It's just that Hancock has been shown to not be so evil as she appears to be, so I wouldn't doubt Oda pulling an "Author's Saving Throw" on her petrifying ability.
how can you debate whether she's evil when she keeps an island of women to herself
-
@The:
One thing I want to say, we are reading a pirates manga.
And it's a crapsack world in which almost everyone will do evil at some point. When freaking pirates are the main heroes, you know there's something really wrong with the rest of the world.
how can you debate whether she's evil when she keeps an island of women to herself
Wouldn't you do the same?
-
This post is deleted!
-
-
And it's a crapsack world in which almost everyone will do evil at some point. When freaking pirates are the main heroes, you know there's something really wrong with the rest of the world.
That is why One Piece is awesome.
I love how "evil" Robin was. She betrayed countless crew and left them to death. Let's say they "deserve" it -
-
@Cyan:
I'd turn it into a casino personally.
Now THAT's evil! You monster! :ninja:
-
What I don't like about these comparisons is the fact that the vast majority of listed candidates seem to have a reason for being the people that they became.
For E.g:
Arlong - Fishman slavery/treatment.
Crocodile - Could possible have some rough past related to Ivankov.
CP9 - All in the name of justice.
Moria - Had his crew killed.
Tenryuubito - Born & raised to believe they were above all.
Akainu - Believes in the most brutal form of justice….no exceptions.I think people like Spandam, Bellamy & Shiryuu are probably what I'd consider more evil than the rest, mainly because their actions are only a bi-factor of their greed/blood-lust/lack of conscience.
Side note: I'd take Crocodiles position with a pinch of salt until we discover the secret. Especially after seeing him and several apparently bad characters turn a new leaf.
-
@Zender:
What I don't like about these comparisons is the fact that the vast majority of listed candidates seem to have a reason for being the people that they became.
For E.g:
Arlong - Fishman slavery/treatment.
Crocodile - Could possible have some rough past related to Ivankov.
CP9 - All in the name of justice.
Moria - Had his crew killed.
Tenryuubito - Born & raised to believe they were above all.
Akainu - Believes in the most brutal form of justice….no exceptions.I think people like Spandam, Bellamy & Shiryuu are probably what I'd consider more evil than the rest, mainly because their actions are only a bi-factor of their greed/blood-lust/lack of conscience.
Side note: I'd take Crocodiles position with a pinch of salt until we discover the secret. Especially after seeing him and several apparently bad characters turn a new leaf.
IMO, just having a reason to be evil is not a redeeming quality at all.
Now, if the character acknowledges his reason, realizes what he's been doing and turn over a new leaf, that's a little better.
I can say Mr. 3 did a noble act in the war. But we don't know Croc's motives. I don't feel he became a better person at all.
-
I can say Mr. 3 did a noble act in the war. But we don't know Croc's motives. I don't feel he became a better person at all.
He has at least shown he'll protect Luffy if it's in his interests, so there's some improvement over impaling him and having a villainous breakdown over water.
-
IMO, just having a reason to be evil is not a redeeming quality at all.
But it definitely is the lesser of two evils when compared to someone that kills for nothing other than their own enjoyment.
Now, if the character acknowledges his reason, realizes what he's been doing and turn over a new leaf, that's fine.
Maybe the poll should have specified it being their current positions.
(as opposed to past actions) -
@Zender:
But it definitely is the lesser of two evils when compared to someone that kills for nothing other than their own enjoyment.
I think an homicidal maniac is an homicidal maniac no matter if he has a freudian excuse or is just doing it for fun.
-
I think an homicidal maniac is an homicidal maniac no matter if he has a freudian excuse or is just doing it for fun.
[hide]Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils [/hide]Just in case you skipped this part… -
@Zender:
[hide]Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils
Lesser of two evils [/hide]Just in case you skipped this part…Say that to the maniac's victims.
-
Say that to the maniac's victims.
This all stems back to the fact that you were treating my post as if I said the actions were justified rather than motivated.
Therefore your reply still remains invalid as it doesn't apply to what I've actually said.
Remember this poll/thread is about deciding who is the greater villain here. At least by acknowledged the two differences I've stated we can rule out a large portion of those people mentioned so far.
-
So you didn't vote at all because from the victims point of view they're all equally evil?
How did you come to that conclusion:
?
Way to confuse everything.No, I ranked them based on how likely they are to harm other people for no apparent reason.
I think Akainu is more despicable than Lucci, for instance, because he not only is willing to kill innocents in order to get a criminal, but he also has the power to take that decision and do not get punished for it. Lucci does not have the same freedom to decide what to do; he's following orders.
The fact that Akainu justifies his actions with justice weights very little in my considerations.
The tenryuubito are the worse because they can do anything with impunity. You didn't bow to them? They shoot you and enslave your spouse. And there's nothing anyone can do to stop them.
-
Criminal A kills 100 people: "I did it for justice."
Criminal B kills 100 people: "The voices in my head told me to do it."Doesn't matter who's motive is better. Fact is, 200 people are still dead.
-
Criminal A kills 100 people: "I did it for justice."
Criminal B kills 100 people: "The voices in my head told me to do it."Doesn't matter who's motive is better. Fact is, 200 people are still dead.
inserts logic spoon
Well congratulations for solving this Oh-so-obvious puzzle…
The point being made is that between the two killers, which is the worst?
The obvious answer being:
Someone killing for pleasure is far worse than someone killing for reasons like revenge, justice or ignorance.
Now apply this logic to the names mentioned so far….
-
@Zender:
Now apply this logic to the names mentioned so far….
That "logic" is just your own opinion.