Does anyone else find it wierd that the haven't announced yoshi o the rest of the original 12?
Super Smash Bros
-
-
Does anyone else find it wierd that the haven't announced yoshi o the rest of the original 12?
i think we will see him today possibly friday is when bigger things are usually revealed.
-
Pic of the day: Looks like someone's enjoying the bachelor life in this pad.
-
I have no idea what that could be from unless it's luigis mansion 2
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
so apparently the level is based on Tomodachi collection, the japan only life sim where you play as miis. Apparently the 3ds one is being localized curfrently so maybe it will come out before smash
-
^cool stage.
I can feel it, the confirmation for Yoshi is just around the corner.
-
well if he didn't reveal yoshi here he might end up revealing with Yarn Yoshi (provided it releases before Smash bros.)
-
http://mynintendonews.com/2014/03/14/kojima-wants-to-see-snake-return-to-super-smash-bros/
There's rampart theorizing going around that Kojima expressing this at such a late point in development means that Konami wasn't approached for Snake, meaning he got cut.
Theere's also devoted Snake players who believe Kojima is just being the usual troll.
Personally, I'm hoping it is true Snake is cut. I don't mind the character as a fighter, I just think he really doesn't fit.
-
snake should be cut and replaced with a character from advance wars. They could reuse snakes move-set but change some aesthetic things
-
Personally, I'm hoping it is true Snake is cut. I don't mind the character as a fighter, I just think he really doesn't fit.
He fit just fine in brawl, in fact his contrast works well against the others and represents something different in this crossover.
@black-leg:snake should be cut and replaced with a character from advance wars. They could reuse snakes move-set but change some aesthetic things
That would be terrible, not only does it devalue snakes moveset, but also the newcomer advanced wars character by making him not unique from the outset.
Honestly i still dont believe that quote means much, its not like he could have said yes anyway, its still rather vague especially if he is screwing with us. I want snake back for sure, he brings so much to the table and it would be a damn shame to lose him or any character with a moveset and style that unique. It bugs me that people are so quick to dismiss him as well, due to either just not liking the character or from sheer nintendo purist kind of views. Theres no point in nintendo closing itself of to other companies in this way, especially if they want to bring in more players.
-
See, but that's my beef. Smash Brothers IS a Nintendo thing in the end, and while I accept Snake in the sense that it opened the gates for Sonic and Megaman to be in it now, Snake makes no sense in the game. We're talking about a character whose icon status emerged from the PS era, and he would have fit a thousandfold better in PSAS.
Also, I don't see it as Nintendo closing itself to others but simply not promoting content it does not receive. We're talking about the other companies closing themselves to Nintendo, and still us expecting Nintendo to be cool with that and promote their content.
If we had some sort of Metal Gear content on the Wii U or 3DS that didn't consist of a quick remake, then sure, I'd consider Snake to be ok in the game. But as it is, both Konami and Kojima have been particularly specific about not wanting the MGS franchise on Nintendo's console, and by sheer principle it would make no sense for Snake to still be in this game. Sonic at least we can argue came back and makes sense after an exclusivity deal with Sega and all the attention Lost World was given. Nintendo has no such connection to Snake or MGS. It was a bit of a shove in Brawl as it is, now given the climate of the Wii U and lack of third party support, it's even more absurd. -
See, but that's my beef. Smash Brothers IS a Nintendo thing in the end, and while I accept Snake in the sense that it opened the gates for Sonic and Megaman to be in it now, Snake makes no sense in the game. We're talking about a character whose icon status emerged from the PS era, and he would have fit a thousandfold better in PSAS.
Also, I don't see it as Nintendo closing itself to others but simply not promoting content it does not receive. We're talking about the other companies closing themselves to Nintendo, and still us expecting Nintendo to be cool with that and promote their content.
If we had some sort of Metal Gear content on the Wii U or 3DS that didn't consist of a quick remake, then sure, I'd consider Snake to be ok in the game. But as it is, both Konami and Kojima have been particularly specific about not wanting the MGS franchise on Nintendo's console, and by sheer principle it would make no sense for Snake to still be in this game. Sonic at least we can argue came back and makes sense after an exclusivity deal with Sega and all the attention Lost World was given. Nintendo has no such connection to Snake or MGS. It was a bit of a shove in Brawl as it is, now given the climate of the Wii U and lack of third party support, it's even more absurd.But see what im saying is that it never took away from it being all about nintendo characters to begin with, you cant honestly say it did without throwing your own opinion of him into the mix. Does every series have to owe dues to nintendo in this case or in general? While MGS itself hasnt done a great deal konami has itself has, and hes their biggest character. Dont write off MGS3D because it was a port, thats not exactly fair to cherry pick games in that manner only to state it doesnt count, it even got a special bundle for the 3DS as well. It didnt hurt brawl with him there for the same year that MGS4 was released, even with all the references it had to that game, his presence doesnt necessarily lead into his game on another system. I just dont like that closed line of thinking when sakurai recently himself said he cares not for console fan wars and the like, while praising the PS4. Snake being in this game will hurt the wiiu no more than the hand its already been dealt, not an ounce. Theres no reason to get rid of him on principle or pride alone, those do not make a solid case for his exclusion when hes actually in better shape towards nintendo then he was before brawl, but either way limiting it to things of that nature should never be the case if they can get a unique fighter out of it in turn making their game all the more desirable. Im not saying you have to love the guy or his series, just be open to what it could bring without the bias of the console wars or sides of the fence.
-
See, but that's my beef. Smash Brothers IS a Nintendo thing in the end, and while I accept Snake in the sense that it opened the gates for Sonic and Megaman to be in it now, Snake makes no sense in the game. We're talking about a character whose icon status emerged from the PS era, and he would have fit a thousandfold better in PSAS. Also, I don't see it as Nintendo closing itself to others but simply not promoting content it does not receive. We're talking about the other companies closing themselves to Nintendo, and still us expecting Nintendo to be cool with that and promote their content.
So, essentially what you're saying is that you don't really see Snake " fitting in" because Nintendo hasn't really had an MGS game exclusive to Nintendo that wasn't a remake. I can see the reasoning behind that, and I use to think the rule of thumb was that if the character was a Nintendo exclusive, they could be in. But ever since Brawl, that rule seems to be "If the character was on a game for a Nintendo console, they can be in". So I don't really see him as an odd man out or anything.
I always thought Marth and Roy were really odd additions to Melee, since I never heard about Fire Emblem games at the time, and I ended up being a fan of the series.
Earthbound hasn't really had anything new for years (unless you count the virtual console release and the release of Mother 3 that never happened overseas), and probably never will have anything new for years to come, but the characters seem to find a way to pop up in Smash.Snake fits just fine.
If we had some sort of Metal Gear content on the Wii U or 3DS that didn't consist of a quick remake, then sure, I'd consider Snake to be ok in the game. But as it is, both Konami and Kojima have been particularly specific about not wanting the MGS franchise on Nintendo's console, and by sheer principle it would make no sense for Snake to still be in this game. Sonic at least we can argue came back and makes sense after an exclusivity deal with Sega and all the attention Lost World was given. Nintendo has no such connection to Snake or MGS. It was a bit of a shove in Brawl as it is, now given the climate of the Wii U and lack of third party support, it's even more absurd.
Has Kojima really been specific in not wanting MGS on a Nintendo console? I don't have a source, but I do remember Kojima in a 2008 interview saying he would've liked to make a MGS game for the Wii, but wanted to get MGS 4 done first. So I hardly see the case being that Kojima simply doesn't want anything to do with Nintendo systems.
But, of course, I haven't exactly being following Kojima closely ever since MGS4 came out.At this point, I'm doubting Snake will be in, but I fully welcome his return if it ever happens.
-
Snake doesn't fit in because Snake is not a Nintendo all-star. No one thinks of Nintendo when the Snake comes up, that's just not how it is.
It's not that I'm in the whole console wars or anything, I've owned about as many Sony consoles and Nintendo ones, but it's like saying Mickey Mouse should be an avenger because there's a connections between Marvel and Disney.Smash Bros. is through and through a game about Nintendo All-Stars and it's my opinion that's how it should remain. Even Sakurai has made it clear he wants to keep it that way. Snake is not a Nintendo all-star. I'd even go and say Sonic isn't either, but given that at present is current games are only enjoyed on Nintendo consoles at least makes it excusable. You know, the fact that a young kid today equates Sonic with Wii U/3DS because that's just where Sonic has become prominent.
Right now, Snake is all about the PS4And no, I don't think Snake harmed Brawl, but it was still a random inclusion nonetheless, and a non-sensical one based on merely the fact Kojima wanted his character in and begged Sakurai. And no, the rule isn't "has been on Nintendo, can make it in." Sakurai has stated, NOT JUST ANYONE gets in from a third party. And frankly, it's that mentality that leads to the hordes of miiverse people asking for anyone from Goku to Bayonetta to Sora to Powerpuff Girls, etc etc.
Mega man was an iconic figure of the NES and SNES days, and highly requested.
Sonic is the result of Sega making a huge partnership and commitment with Nintendo, as well as sheer popularity and fame.
The audience that loves Snake is more likely to be playing a PS4 this year than a Wii U, and while there is overlap, that's just the reality of it, and I think you're lying to yourself if you don't see Snake as a character iconic more than anything to the Playstation brand. -
Snake doesn't fit in because Snake is not a Nintendo all-star. No one thinks of Nintendo when the Snake comes up, that's just not how it is.
It's not that I'm in the whole console wars or anything, I've owned about as many Sony consoles and Nintendo ones, but it's like saying Mickey Mouse should be an avenger because there's a connections between Marvel and Disney.Gotcha, but I'd hardly call Game & Watch, Earthbound characters Nintendo "All-Stars" to begin with, even if most were Nintendo exclusives. So while Smash is mainly an all-star treatment, it isn't that exclusively all-star oriented.
Smash Bros. is through and through a game about Nintendo All-Stars and it's my opinion that's how it should remain. Even Sakurai has made it clear he wants to keep it that way. Snake is not a Nintendo all-star.
Yet he still put him in and was pretty well received from what I gather. I'm all on board to keeping Smash pretty Nintendo centric, and seeing that Snake was in 4 games on Nintendo platforms… I think that's pretty ok.
And no, the rule isn't "has been on Nintendo, can make it in." Sakurai has stated, NOT JUST ANYONE gets in from a third party. And frankly, it's that mentality that leads to the hordes of miiverse people asking for anyone from Goku to Bayonetta to Sora to Powerpuff Girls, etc etc.
Of course not just anyone can make it in. Let's not take this to an absurd extent here. Back when Brawl was building hype, I thought it was ridiculous that people asked for James Bond (from N64 GoldenEye). And I never said it was a clear cut rule, more like it's now the general guideline, loosened from the originally popular thought of "Only Nintendo exclusives."
Not just anyone can get in, but the fact is Snake did, and yes, he's more iconic in the PS demographic, but he isn't that foreign to Nintendo.The audience that loves Snake is more likely to be playing a PS4 this year than a Wii U, and while there is overlap, that's just the reality of it, and I think you're lying to yourself if you don't see Snake as a character iconic more than anything to the Playstation brand.
True. But adding to the fact that he was in Brawl, he really isn't as much of a black sheep that you're trying to make him out to be. Everyone knows he was in Brawl, so a return wouldn't throw people off guard all that much.
You don't want Snake in, and that's cool. It just happens that I want the opposite, and really… that's all it comes down to. Because neither of us are going to change anything in it's development. I feel he fits with Smash just fine.
-
and I think you're lying to yourself if you don't see Snake as a character iconic more than anything to the Playstation brand.
Yeah sorry to butt in, but this really put a stick in my craw.
While the port is does have quite a few problems ,Metal Gear on the NES is still a damn good game and remains the one of my favorite NES games of all time.Hell the only reason I gave a damn about Metal Gear Solid was because I played the NES game first.
I don't care if some kid born ten years ago associates Metal Gear with the Playstation, I associate Metal Gear with the Nintendo Entertainment System. -
@Mr.:
Gotcha, but I'd hardly call Game & Watch, Earthbound characters Nintendo "All-Stars" to begin with, even if most were Nintendo exclusives. So while Smash is mainly an all-star treatment, it isn't that exclusively all-star oriented.
Earthbound is really telling considering how they use a new cast of characters every game.
-
http://mynintendonews.com/2014/03/14/kojima-wants-to-see-snake-return-to-super-smash-bros/
There's rampart theorizing going around that Kojima expressing this at such a late point in development means that Konami wasn't approached for Snake, meaning he got cut.
Theere's also devoted Snake players who believe Kojima is just being the usual troll.
Personally, I'm hoping it is true Snake is cut. I don't mind the character as a fighter, I just think he really doesn't fit.
I don't care if he fits or not (he doesn't) he's already part of the family and should be in some way or another.
-
I personally don't want to see snake return. I had nothing against snake but i think there are better characters that the slot could be used for. I agree with Noqanky that, at least nowadays, he is more fitted to Playstation but i don't want his moveset to just go away. Thats why i was hoping that sakurai could use some of his moves, not all and not just a snake clone, but like the grenade or missile for a newcomer who could replace him.
as for the argument about nintendo's all-cast i do count earthbound and game & watch because they are nintendo franchises. It's only the 3rd party characters that are not Nintendo all-stars but sonic and mega man are associated with nintendo and so could fit in
-
as for the argument about nintendo's all-cast i do count earthbound and game & watch because they are nintendo franchises. It's only the 3rd party characters that are not Nintendo all-stars but sonic and mega man are associated with nintendo and so could fit in
Right. But the point I'm trying to make is that it's odd to call it just an all-star cast when Earthbound and Game & Watch characters were pretty obscure before Smash came about, so to call them "All-Stars" is iffy to me.
-
Idk, Snake's a pretty cool guy, but I never felt that he really fit in with the rest of the characters in terms of attacks and, well, nintendo history. While G&W and Earthbound can't honestly be considered nintendo staples, G&W is a really big piece of Nintendo history, and Earthbound has been a cult classic ever since its debut in the US.
Like I guess I would be okay if he made it into Smash 4, but he really doesn't add anything to the experience for me.
I don't care if some kid born ten years ago associates Metal Gear with the Playstation, **I associate Metal Gear with the Nintendo Entertainment System.**That's all nice and dandy but I really wouldn't consider Metal Gear NES as the catalyst to put Snake in the game considering Kojima himself absolutely loathes that port with a passion.
As far as Metal Gear games go on nintendo systems, you've got the MGS1 remake, Ghost Babel, and the NES game, the second of which is non canonical, and the first a remake of a game that came out on the PS. On the other hand, Literally every game otherwise besides the soon to debut gameset of GZ/TPP has been exclusive to Playstation, and really even if Snake got a port to the NES, Snake definitely is more of a playstation character than a nintendo character.
-
If Capcom is letting MegaMan be in this game, Konami could just replace Snake with Simon(Pre-LoS version).
-
One thing which I noticed: a Sonic Team member said something similar about Sonic returning back in June.
Regardless of whether or not Snake's returning, it seems unlikely that Kojima would have legally been able to say anything before Nintendo officially confirmed it one way or another; presumably, there are non-disclosure agreements in place for that sort of thing.
As for Metal Gear not being "relevant enough" to Nintendo, roughly half of the currently released games in the Metal Gear Solid franchise have been released on Nintendo systems, (2 out of 5) and those games were generally considered to be the best of the series. Even taking Metal Gear 1, 2, and Revengeance into account, it's still 3/8. Besides, Metal Gear created the entire concept of stealth in gaming, and it's easily one of Konami's best-selling and profitable franchises. Why would Konami pick another franchise to represent their company over Metal Gear? Of the most notable options, Castlevania is not as popular in Japan as it is in North America going by interviews with Koji Igarashi, the producer of the series, and Konami hasn't done anything with Bomberman since they bought Hudson. Besides, as long as it can get Smash Bros. fans interested in playing Metal Gear games, or Metal Gear fans interested in Smash Bros., (not to say that there isn't already some overlap) it's advantageous for both Nintendo and Konami.
For Snake not fitting in? It's a crossover game - you'd hardly expect Pokemon and Star Fox to inhabit the same universe, or Metroid and Mario, but it still works in Smash Bros. Given how goofy the Metal Gear series can get at times, between cardboard boxes being the perfect disguise, obese roller-skating demolition experts, people with the power to make bees form working guns, and the over-abundance of nanomachines as an explanation for virtually everything, it's clear that Metal Gear doesn't take itself anywhere near as seriously as most games in a relatively modern military setting, and that helped to make it work (for me, at least).
@Purple:
As far as Metal Gear games go on nintendo systems, you've got the MGS1 remake, Ghost Babel, and the NES game, the second of which is non canonical, and the first a remake of a game that came out on the PS. On the other hand, Literally every game otherwise besides the soon to debut gameset of GZ/TPP has been exclusive to Playstation, and really even if Snake got a port to the NES, Snake definitely is more of a playstation character than a nintendo character.
There's also the remake of Metal Gear Solid 3 for the 3DS.
-
For Snake not fitting in? It's a crossover game - you'd hardly expect Pokemon and Star Fox to inhabit the same universe, or Metroid and Mario, but it still works in Smash Bros. Given how goofy the Metal Gear series can get at times, between cardboard boxes being the perfect disguise, obese roller-skating demolition experts, people with the power to make bees form working guns, and the over-abundance of nanomachines as an explanation for virtually everything, it's clear that Metal Gear doesn't take itself anywhere near as seriously as most games in a relatively modern military setting, and that helped to make it work (for me, at least).
One thing that people tend to forget about fighting games is that it's not a new or foreign concept for characters not apart of the same universe or even the same company to be included in a game's roster.
-
I've got to agree though that Snake 'not fitting in' is a weak argument against him returning. I think juxtaposing him against the silliness of Smash makes Snake pretty silly, himself.
The valid reason for Snake not returning is licensing, but Hideo Kojima apparently wanted Snake to appear in Smash as early as Melee, but wasn't added due to time constraints. It seems like both parties wanted it and, unless that's changed, I can't see any reason for Snake to go missing.
-
I don't want Snake in because I think there are other, more deserving characters and given that Smash has limited time and money resources, I'd rather see those go to first party Nintendo characters, or at least more closely affiliated third party characters
-
@Snake discussion: I'll admit I like Snake and used him relatively often in Brawl. Did I think he was kind of a random inclusion? Yes….but then again, I suppose it would've been a different story if he was confirmed late in development rather than in early trailers.
Third-party characters are okay if there aren't a lot of them, otherwise it'd spoil the metamorphical Nintendo stew. But then again, our three third-party...-ers have had some rhyme and reason to it. Snake and Mega Man started on the NES, although the former has been largely Sony for years and is the least....Nintendo-y of them all.
And as Noqanky said, Sonic's validated by the recent Nintendo-Sega collaboration and he's been Mario's de-facto rival for over 20 years.
tl;dr: would I want Snake again? Er....tbh I think Mega Man fits a little more, but I wouldn't be against him returning. (although, I personally think three third party characters in the same game would be enough)
Sakurai has stated, NOT JUST ANYONE gets in from a third party. And frankly, it's that mentality that leads to the hordes of miiverse people asking for anyone from Goku to Bayonetta to Sora to Powerpuff Girls, etc etc.
This. I get irritated everytime I see people suggest asinine newcomers like freaking Master Chief.
-
I really hope Snake isn't in them. They've used every last excuse to NOT give the Wii U the recent Metal Gear games so why should they get him in.Prof Layton or Phoenix Wright would make better candidates for third party inclusions if they so need one.
-
I really hope Snake isn't in them. They've used every last excuse to NOT give the Wii U the recent Metal Gear games so why should they get him in.Prof Layton or Phoenix Wright would make better candidates for third party inclusions if they so need one.
I doubt they'd give Capcom two characters; as for Layton, is he as well-known as the three third party characters who have already been in Smash Bros.? (I'm not familiar with Layton's games)
-
Snake and Mega Man started on the NES, although the former has been largely Sony for years and is the least….Nintendo-y of them all.
Actually Snake got his start on the MSX2 not the NES.
I really hope Snake isn't in them. They've used every last excuse to NOT give the Wii U the recent Metal Gear games so why should they get him in.
If Sakurai wants him in and Kojma agrees he'll get in no promotion necessary.
-
Actually Snake got his start on the MSX2 not the NES.
…Oh, the Metal Gear NES game doesn't count? (because Kojima didn't make it?)
-
…Oh, the Metal Gear NES game doesn't count? (because Kojima didn't make it?)
More like it was a port that many people who've played both it and the original MSX2 version consider to be inferior to the original including Kojima himself. And nope Kojima wasn't responsible for that version so I'm guessing it doesn't count.
-
Kojima had zero input into the NES port, and as a result any time it gets brought up he pretty much considers it disowned.
-
@Purple:
Kojima had zero input into the NES port, and as a result any time it gets brought up he pretty much considers it disowned.
But it's sequel snakes revenge is what got Kojima to make the real sequel.
-
@Venomous:
But it's sequel snakes revenge is what got Kojima to make the real sequel.
Only in the sense that Kojima didn't want yet another game without any of his input being put out as a sequel.
Not that every game has to have his input, but when he basically completely disregards the NES games as part of the canon and as legitimate Metal Gear games, it makes it difficult to make it really feel like these NES games were really the foothold for Metal Gear on nintendo consoles.
-
Regardless of the level of Kojima's involvement with any of the Metal Gear games that appeared on Nintendo platforms, their are Metal Gear games on Nintendo platforms. Snake has his ticket to ride.
As for how he gels with all of Nintendo's other characters, easy, Solid Snake has history and prestige behind him.
He debuted during late eighties around the same time as a lot of other Nintendo characters with a genre defining games.
Then managed to be one of the few classic characters to not only survive the jump from 2D to 3D, but to do it with a game that still gets put on damn near every greatest games list, just like Ocarina of time and Mario 64. Games that wrote the rulebook for how 3D games worked.Since Melee and its virtual Nintendo museum that was the trophy collection,I've looked at Smash Bros as a celebration of not only its most popular characters, but its history as well. When Sakurai opened the roster to third party characters, he created the opportunity to celebrate video game history in general.
Solid Snake may not have been a regular on Nintendo consoles but he has more than earned his right to appear in Smash Bros.
-
I check in on this thread randomly and see all this Snake talk and got hype thinking that maybe they updated and he returned.
Nope. Much disappoint.
-
I will say that they made him gel pretty well in brawl, especially with his codec conversations, food eating responses like in MGS3, and other random gags. But I honestly can't say that I'd miss him if he were left out because his name is honestly not one I associate with Nintendo.
-
I would miss Snake. He is such a unique character in Smash for both his style and his gameplay. I also just really like his gameplay. It is so satisfying to lay traps for opponents and watch them blow up in their faces.
-
Pic of the day! The Smash Ball.
Come to think of it, I haven't introduced any of the Final Smashes yet… Then again, if I introduced every single one, it'd take over a month's worth of posts.
hmm….how many characters would that translate to?
-
Not sure what Sakurai is talking about when he says none were introduced yet when we have clearly seen Samus's, Wii Fit Trainers and Macs.
-
Not sure what Sakurai is talking about when he says none were introduced yet when we have clearly seen Samus's, Wii Fit Trainers and Macs.
I noticed similar comments on Miiverse. Perhaps he meant a formal introduction, as in an actual post?
-
There are at least 20 post in a month, I guess that we already are past that point. 5 Newcomers, the original 8 (-Y +L) Peach, Zelda, Pit, Bowser, Sonic, Olimar, Diddy, DDD, Marth, Lucario, TLink.
-
Pic of the day! The Smash Ball.
hmm….how many characters would that translate to?
over a month means a minimum of 31 characters
it seems bigger might just be the angle
-
over a month means a minimum of 31 characters
I think he meant a month in line with how many he posts, so 5 days a week and minus the weekends. With that in mind it would take slightly over a month of pic of the days for all the current characters. I think many are assuming a full month without looking into how he worded it
-
I keep forgeting to post these in case anyone is interested: http://www.thefighterscorner.org/2/post/2014/03/march-15th-2014.html
As for todays pic of the day, essentially the typical miiverse crowd assumed he meant 32+ characters but i see it more as the amount of pictures he posts in a month which is 22 roughly. I actually like to think that sakurai has been holding off of showing final smashes because part of the customization will be the ability to change a characters final smash. I might write an article on this tomorrow.
-
I wouldn't take much from that Miiverse comment - it would take about a month with the currently revealed characters. As for the comment about not having introduced them yet, it seems like he means that he hasn't shown any on the daily screenshots yet.
-
-
That's a lot of Landmasters!
New Challenger Approaching!
"This is gonna be fun!"
"Personally, I prefer the air."
"Landmaster!"
Landmaster crashes in the Smash!
followed by five landmaster character clones.
-
Pic of the day. Here's some info on the Nintendo 3DS stage called Super Mario 3D Land! First, it advances by side-scrolling…
Then you continue into the valley–it's in 3D Land, after all. The protruding stone blocks change the angles of the platforms.
After that, back to side-scrolling. Now it gets you moving–you'll have to trot downhill here.
And finally, you get back on rails to go farther into the stage. It takes roughly two minutes to complete a lap, and at the end you go into a giant pipe that takes you back to the beginning. …I know this sequence goes above and beyond a traditional Pic of the Day, so consider this a little something extra on the side from me.
Interesting.
-
thats a lot of posts. I like that the incoming blocks will changethe platform. It seems like they fall from the top although it wouldbe a neat use of the 3D effect if they came from behind.
Also the stage is called Super Mario 3D Land. Such creativity