Most Hated Anime/Manga/Game Character
-
-
i watched 4 episodes , he is the opposite of shinji !
-
This is a letter of love and peace; I will not lash out against anyone, and I will not use specific names of individuals or organizations that discredit legitimate voices in the antagonism debate. That said, let me merely point out that Shandian's degeneracy has permeated the whole stratum of society. Before I launch into my main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Shandian has inherited the whole of his little stock of phrases and notions, which he is pleased to call "ideas", from what I call twisted knuckleheads, and (2) as a result of that, by now, we are all more than familiar with his clueless fulminations. Now that you know where I stand on those issues, I can safely say that I once told him that the fork-tongued nature of his jokes distracts us from the real lessons we could learn from a rigorous critique of Shandian's bruta fulmina. How did Shandian respond to that? He proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that he denies that he has been turning warmongers loose against us good citizens. His denials clearly contradict reports from eyewitnesses who saw him forcing me to contract leprosy and be forced to live out my benighted days shunned by humanity, ringing a bell, and shying away from sharps and open flames. I'd like to see Shandian spin his way out of that one.
I am not mistaken when I say that by giving rise to the most abhorrent lunatics I've ever seen, Shandian is telegraphing his intentions to conduct business in a crazy, pestiferous way. Before he once again claims that we can stop lexiphanicism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for corporatism-prone sluggards, he should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with his helots. Shandian wants us to feel sorry for the obstreperous lowbrows who displace meaningful discussion of an issue's merit or demerit with hunch and emotion. I feel we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that I decidedly hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Shandian does any real damage. Or is it already too late? To turn that question around, to what degree is Shandian going to eviscerate every bit of social progress of the past century? I'm sure you already know the answer so I won't bother repeating it. I'd like to emphasize, however, that Shandian uses a rather stupid definition of "phenolsulphonephthalein". But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that he has a driving need to thrust all of us into scenarios rife with personal animosities and petty resentments? My best guess, for what it may be worth, is based on two key observations. The first observation is that there is more than a mite of palaver in his magic-bullet explanations. The second, more telling, observation is that I truly feel that Shandian has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. He obviously has none or he wouldn't create a world sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism, and ignorance.
Shandian's garrulous game of chess—the bilious chess of animalism—has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this insolent, coprophagous self-promoter and show him that now that I've been exposed to his threats I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps either he has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context.
Although everyone has goals, Shandian's goal seems to be to cause this country to flounder on the shoals of self-interest, corruption, and chaos. Who among you reading these words is not moved to even the score? If I had my druthers, Shandian would never have had the opportunity to call evil good and good evil. As it stands, Shandian wants to prevent us from commenting on his drug-induced ravings. If he manages to do that, he'll have plenty of time to focus on his core mission: increasing society's cycle of hostility and violence.
If this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to exemplify the principles of honor, duty, loyalty, and courage. Shandian may treat traditional values as if they were smarmy, power-hungry crimes right after he reads this letter. Let him. In the blink of an eye, I will criticize Shandian's rejoinders publicly for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power. I always find more to condemn than to commend about his ungrateful, self-deceiving perversions. But that's not all: The next time he decides to scapegoat easy, unpopular targets, thereby diverting responsibility from more culpable parties, he should think to himself, cui bono?—who benefits?
Given the tenor of our times, Shandian once said that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. Oh, please. I'm just glad I hadn't eaten dinner right before I heard him say that. Otherwise, I'd probably still be vomiting too hard to tell you that Shandian has for a long time been arguing that national-security interests can and should be sidestepped whenever his personal interests are at stake. Had he instead been arguing that he is changing beyond belief our country's entire national spirit, its philosophy, values, and standards and thereby insulting my intelligence, I might cede him his point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Shandian's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how his ability to flap his gums greatly exceeds his cognitive skills. Be patient; I won't ask you to take that on faith. Rather, I'll provide irrefragable proof that Shandian is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Shandian and a pigeon is that Shandian intends to "solve" all our problems by talking them to death. That's why this discussion is meant to apply to modern escapism only. To say anything else would be a lie.
As far back as I can remember, Shandian has pitted rotters against moral weaklings and individuals against fast-buck artists. Fortunately, if you ever get into an argument with some of his emissaries about whether or not Shandian's operatives amount to nothing more than ugly dunces riding on the back of a social fungus attacking the body politic, I have an excellent sockdolager for you. Simply inform the other party that I intend to look closely at Shandian's false-flag operations to see what makes them so effectual at laying waste to the environment. I should expect to find—this is a guess that I currently lack sufficient knowledge to verify—that Shandian's coadjutors believe that every word that leaves Shandian's mouth is teeming with useful information. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that drug money is being used to pay for the construction of huge underground cities intended to house both humans and aliens who serve a secret, transnational shadow government can believe anything, especially if it's false.
I can easily see Shandian performing the following insane acts. First, he will step on other people's toes. Then, he will preach a propaganda of hate. I do not profess to know how likely is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct possibility to be kept in mind.
To bring the matter closer to home, let me remind you that Shandian looks down upon the rest of us. From his perspective, we are blind so he must tell us what to see; we are deaf so he must tell us what to hear; and we are mute so he must tell us what to say. Such views may fool soporific casuists, but I warrant that Shandian says that character development is not a matter of "strength through adversity" but rather, "entitlement through victimization". Although Shandian surely cut that statement out of whole cloth, he is intellectually dishonest in everything he says and does. And here, I insist, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in his morals.
While Shandian has been beating the drums of ageism, I've been trying to resolve a number of lingering problems. In doing so, I've learned that he should be forced to wear a scarlet "W" for "Wants to malign and traduce me". I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that he says that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. What balderdash! What impudence! What treachery! I'll end this letter with a personal invitation to Shandian himself: If you care to respond to what I wrote, please do, especially if you think that I am being inaccurate or unfair. I do not wish to misrepresent you in any way whatsoever. Pax vobiscum.To sum it all up: Don't test your luck, pal! >:)
brevity is the soul of wit
-
Shinji from EVA.