@Darth:
Oh my god… this is such wonderful example.
So, let me point to you all logical errors you've made in this very short sentence.
"We" is a big quantifier. And I mean really big. I can mean anything from "We as a human species", "We as One Piece readers", "We as participants of this forum", "We as participants of this thread" or "We as participants of this discussion". You should be more precise in your wording, because usualy in those cases the largest group sharing the subject is assumed. In this case, it would be One Piece readers. And, if any one among said group of One Piece readers doesn't share your opinion, then that sentence as a whole is logicaly untrue. That is the first point.
Next. "Luffy will reach that same level in an even younger age". First.
You cannot logicaly prove that Luffy will reach the same level, because: A) You do not posses knowledge of the future, nor do you have acces to Oda's notes, or his thoughts, therefore you are unable to undeniably prove that Luffy will reach that level in the future B) You posses no clear, measurable information about level of both Sabo and Luffy. That statement is an absolute, and as such it requires a unrefutable proof. You would need to change "will" to "may", for this statement to be even considered. As well as drop the whole level thing. Level is measurable, but we have no ways to measure it. If you cannot give us solid data, we cannot consider that statement true on logical level.
Second, neither do you posses knowledge if that theoretical event will happen and if it happens, neither do you know when. Unless, again, you can provide unrefutable proof of this event being planned in advance, you cannot make absolute statement like that. And even if you possesed said proof, that statement is still unlogical, because you cannot guarantee the artist, in this case Oda, won't change his mind, and therefore make your statement logicaly untrue again.
And that was your lesson for today kids. Do not use words like "logic" lightly. None of you, including me, is using logical arguments here, so leave it alone, will ya?
what'S weird is that you are the one who brings up the ''not logic'' argument the most around here darth.
Jusssst sayin