Let me clarify that nobody ever said (or at least I didn't) that the guy should not go to jail no matter what, they merely pointed out that if the reason of his incarceration was the possesion of some lolicon (don't really know what that is) then the case was pure hogwash.
And I think I made it clear in my first post that if that's ALL it comes down to, I agree.
Yeah, key word 'might' rape.
Refer to [many of] my earlier post(s) to see how I addressed this.