@Strelоk:
And you have to insult people you don't know in addition to shit-posting and derailing the thread?
Dan does make a point though? Why is it when people making points someone else goes at there throat?
@Strelоk:
And you have to insult people you don't know in addition to shit-posting and derailing the thread?
Dan does make a point though? Why is it when people making points someone else goes at there throat?
I know somewhere this question was probably already answered and I did scan through some sections but I just don't have enough time in my day to look through everything and I'm at work.
So what is really bugging me is, how come the new one piece chapters aren't translated by mangarule yet?? Are they good, is something wrong?
The enlighten ones will already know, but for the rest of you:
Vote Senor Pink, because Steve Buscemi. Thats why.
Voted for Don, but because of Steve Buscemi, I also voted Senor Pink.
Bartolomeo could never dream of beating an undead Mummy, look at these things.
Vote for Sorcerer Mummy.
Elizabello won't even need his King Punch to blow this election away!
Smiley won me over in this one, sorry Mario!
A strong arm could never beat a glorious Mustang.
Vote Mustang.
I was thinking of watching this series but out of curiosity does anyone know if I should watch the original Doctor Who series before starting this one?
I….I...actually passed the First Round Preliminaries!? People actually voted for me!?
Vote Mustang! If you vote for the Mustang, you'll get this free complimentary Mustang!
Mustang all the way!
Well uh, I'd love to vote but I can't? I just voted in the C Block like an hour ago and now I can't vote here….
UPDATE: I clicked CP0 and Mario but it counted my vote as Fighting Fish? Just not my lucky day.
I'm still rooting for you CP0 and Mario!
Gonna have to say Fighting Fish and the CP0 boyz
Soon as this thread was created and I read who was named I had a good feeling Kuzan's Penguin would win.
My vote is for Diamante, the Don, Pattori, and Momo.
@Panda:
Honestly, the financial argument is probably the absolute weakest one you could make in favor of the death penalty. Due to the whole long, dragged out system of constant appeals, putting someone to death actually ends up costing rather considerably more than simply sentencing them to life.
How so? Not saying you are wrong but how can a month to several years of housing the death row and doses of that poison they inject victims with cost more then housing them for 25-70 years of their lives?
Housing people for death row only lasts for so long. Instead were housing them for the rest of their lives, and we have to pay taxes for those killers to eat and sleep. That is wrong in my eyes.
@The:
The severe case is probably a mass-murderer or serial killer.
Exactly. Like the bombing in Boston. You think those people only deserve a life sentence? No, in reality when you kill with the intention of just pointlessly hurting/killing others, you deserve death. No more, no less.
If that was meant for me, just so you know, i was just kidding, not need to get angry about that, it just got really calm since a few days.. btw u can change ur signature now
It wasn't at you. Just the constant bickering I've seen here lately lol.
Didn't even notice my signature, thanks! I had it hidden for awhile and forgot I even had it.
Also, because I don't think the justice system is primarily for the purpose of punishment and because I don't think the death penalty serves any purpose.
Without the death penalty prisons have become clogged, prisoners with life sentences harm/kill other prisoners and have really no major punishment like Drake said, and you think if somebody goes on a killing spree and kills two or more innocent lives for no reason they should just be put in jail for life?
I think the death penalty should only be given in severe cases.
I don't think we can really just re-introduce it. In any form. Because I think it's stupid.
Is it always morally correct? No. Though I do believe it is a necessarily punishment in certain circumstances. Why do you think it is stupid?
Looks like Cavendish has this one, SUCCESS!
Stay gold Cavendish, stay gold.
I always thought a good compromise would be that you can only get put to death on a conviction for a 2nd, separate crime.
It pretty much eliminates the possibility of a wrongful conviction (the odds of being wrongfully convicted twice are astronomical, and if someone's THAT good at framing people they'd have better ways of killing you), and keeps an extra incentive for the 20-years guys to NOT just go out and murder again.
It'd also help to crack down on prisoner-on-prisoner murders, since right now there is pretty much no consequences for that. What, they're going to get another life sentence?
This. Literally everything I believe about prison and the death penalty summed up right here.
The death penalty can be a very bad thing, but also a very good thing. I don't think we can really just get rid of it though, we need it like Drake Cloud said.
As a child I used to watch Live TV everyday, then I learned how to watch stuff online for free. TV shows, movies, games, whatever, I could get it for free and at anytime. I didn't have to wait till 5 for a new show to come on and miss it by accident. Instead I could watch it online whenever I felt like it. For a time it was really nice, but now I find myself disliking it because I don't give the shows or creators of them any credit or views or anything. I just did everything illegally for free.
So now I try to watch Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead on TV while it's on so it gets my view and what not. I find myself hating 90% of the trash on TV now though, and I just can't bring myself to sit down and watch it anymore.
Based on my personal life, I'd say Live TV is dying for sure.
@Cyan:
Emo Sasuke is going to get replaced by FRIENDSHIP HOKAGE YATTA Sasuke
So is your posting history purposely terrible or what
I didn't think my posting history was terrible, I usually post fine, but uh yeah, sure.
Of course I don't really like Naruto. Geez.
Best Naruto chapter in history of ever. All hail the King of manga! It is a great day, for today….Sasuke has joined the good guys again! YES!
Yeah quitting cigarettes will greatly improve his immune systems health, he really should look into that.
However, I hope he is okay after all this! He really should take a break, and even though he is probably in pain and what not, I hope he can somehow enjoy his time off!
Sooo uh, is there a Mangarule version out yet? It's still not on Batoto or anything…a bit confused.
I actually think Joa might be stronger than Setsuno from the way Zaus and her talked about him.
I can see it now, Dofla shunning/hating Bellamy even though he worships him. Dofla does something messed up to Bellamy even though he adores him, and Luffy gets pissed about it. Luffy beats Dofla and then Bellamy respects Luffy.
This might be a bad example, but if you read the Viz version of One Piece they call the Shichibukai the Seven Military Seas correct? I forget. But I would like that better then keeping it as Shichibukai, because I read it and it actually means something to me rather then having to figure out what a Shichibukai really is. That, and I can't even pronounce it.
Know what I mean?
Hmmm, I'll probably be rooting for Cavendish! Or maybe Don Chinjao….
Why do you ignore Monkey King's point about One Piece not being set in Japan. The attacks don't need to have Japanese names unless it's Zoro or fighters from Wano, etc.
…that is what I was saying. I said I'd rather the attacks be translated into English even if they sound silly.
If it said Rubber Rubber Giant Pistol just put under it the Gomu Gomu no Gigant PistolThats what I prefer at least.
Also, is it just me that is bothered that they translated Hack's attack? It's a manga with techniques in various languages, would be a lot nicer to have them as intended by the author. Otherwise, we can go around yelling "Rubber Rubber Pistol" and "Demon Cut"EDIT: And before someone say it's not constructive critic, I'll just give an exemple of better word amongst so many: deception.
This annoys me. I hate reading the attacks in Japanese and have them make no sense at all. It's the same name of the attack, but in OUR language. So you know, we understand what it means? I personally like when they translate it to English then have the Japanese meaning under it.
Were not a Christian based country? You'd rather take away our right of protection and by doing that changing nothing? Taking away guns won't do anything statistically. Yeah this is my last post. ill stop posting after this. I'll respect your views.
That minuscule difference might make all the difference one day, maybe even 100-200 years from now. How do you know? Taking away our protection and saying they will protect us, when they don't always do whats best for us, is scary to me.
Plus statistically countries that DID take away gun rights the crime rate either HARDLY went down or didn't go down at ALL. So what makes you think it will do any good to take away our right!?
See, the government may be corrupt, but the problem is you're exaggerating the extent. YOu're whole arguement is based on unjustified paranoia and that's what we have a problem with. So tell me: Why is owning firearms a right in the first place? It's only considered a right in America because the government said so in the first place, but I hardly see something like owning guns as an intrinisic human right on the same level as free speech or the likes.
Why shouldn't it be a right? First off, you don't know what kind of crazy person is out there that could potentially harm you or your family. So, let's say he has an illegal firearm on him and nobody knew of it, you wouldn't want one to fight back? You would wait till the police arrived to save the day? By then he would have done whatever sick thing he had planned and left. Out in the streets in a sketchy city/place, wouldn't you want a gun for safety? Never know what kind of scumbag might run into you.
Second, in case any sort of revolution or government betrayal ever happened, yes I want a pistol for protection. I want my children, grand children, and great-grandchildren to all have that protection. That'll do better then fists. I never said I think that our government is going to slaughter us all any day now. I don't think that at all, but I do know they have lied to us before, and I just don't trust that.
Also, no, Japan isn't enslaved. It's not like this is the only thing are government is doing that bothers me. Look at schools, the cafeterias, kids can't even eat what they want anymore. It just gets worse. Were told it's for their health, but they are fucking kids, they are going to eat a little junk food.
Look at how they want to take away God from America. We can learn about Jews and Islams in school, but never Christianity.
It's just the principal of them always taking things away, as minor as they are. I don't like it. If you do, I respect that and I'm done fighting with you all.
I'm not posting anymore, happy?
I just said I don't even think the government is out just to get us, but at the same time in no way do I trust it. Especially to take away my right to own a firearm. If they do that, then what's next? Geez. You're all misunderstand what I was saying but I'm done here.
The dangerous thing is ignorant people trusting everything they tell you.
Get off my damn ass, all I said is that taking away ALL gun owning rights is going against our freedom. Making gun laws stricter, is perfectly FINE.
Yes, I damn well believe I have a right to own a gun, not a damn AK-47, but a handgun. Do gun laws need to be more strict? Yes. Do they need to be taken away? No.
What is so god damn bad about that? I don't trust governments and fucking officials. They already cheat us and lie to us, what you truly think they are 100% dead honest people all out to help us? No. Are they 100% out there just to hurt us? No. I just don't want my government taking shit away from, I'm sorry but that's simple. That's all I'm saying. I don't care what statistics or proof you pull out your ass, I don't want someone taking away my self-defense. That's that.
As if people who give in to every will of the system and believe every damn thing they are told are going to make me stop posting. Sound like a bunch of people trying to empower of Government even more, hell why NOT just turn us into slaves? Government knows best, right? Jesus Christ.
[http://theweek.com/article/index/240019/lying-cheating-stealing-how-corrupt-is-america
T](http://theweek.com/article/index/240019/lying-cheating-stealing-how-corrupt-is-america)hat.
[http://www.lawlessamerica.com/
T](http://www.lawlessamerica.com/)hat.
[http://www.debate.org/opinions/is-the-u-s-government-corrupt
T](http://www.debate.org/opinions/is-the-u-s-government-corrupt)hat.
Hop off.
I feel bad for you who are slaves to the system, seriously blinded and willing to lose rights, it's pathetic.
@Monkey:
Who do you want to bet knows more about…
1. History
2. Contemporary Governments and Political InstabilityYou or me? I wonder! It's a pretty open question!
It might be that not knowing jackshit about either one of these leads people to lazy dumbass conclusions about their surroundings, but I dunno.
You act like what you're saying is a fact, when it's really just an opinion. But okay maan. I'm not arguing with you.
47 If you are in your 30s don't post in a Anime Forum anymore. There are other forums like Sports and Car forums that have no age limit. Gardening forum would be a good one too.
Why is there an age limit for that? What, people in their 30's can't go on forums and talk to other people about a series they like? You're lame.
@Monkey:
Before you stop posting I have a fun game you can play. It's called "Find the people here advocating for banning guns period". Ready? Go! It's a bit of a trick game, but you'll figure it out I'm sure!
Once you're done with that, we can come to the conclusion that no one at all gives a fuck about what you think about gun bans, and are in fact laughing at your terribly retarded notions about needing the guns for some government related reason. Which of course should be followed by you not posting again.
I just think it's funny you don't think one day the government could end up doing something like that, cause you know, that's never happened in history before. But whatever man. You're cool.
As for my bunker, we have a Chiappa M9-22 handgun. Which, I would enjoy keeping. Thank you.
@Monkey:
Stop posting. Go back to lurking.
No, and who are you to tell me to stop posting? Just because I think it's fucked up that people like you think it's okay for people to tell you what you can and can not have? Only to a certain extent is that acceptable, but taking all rights to own a simple pistol for self defense away is okay to you? My God….I'll just stop wasting my time with single-minded people like you.
@wolfwoof:
I sorta get having a gun for personal protection. There's lots of psychos out there
Thank you! I shouldn't have my government telling me I can't protect myself, or my family, in case something DID happen. It's just unsubstantial.