@Demon:
That is our ENTIRE ARGUMENT. No, not kidding at all. Out ENTIRE argument is not and has NEVER BEEN that sexuality should be removed entirely from video games. It's ALWAYS been for a more nuanced and realistic approach to the demographics of characters in gaming. Give us some goddamn normal looking women instead of supermodels.
Oh, and treat them like real characters who are real people, not objects to be lusted after and nothing else.
Nono , I have been saying from the begining that I'm pro-choice when it comes to these things. Give the players choice , don't take it away from them. Things started going downhill when I said something like "why can't women have character AND be sex symbols". Then lot's of other arguments surfaced up (too much sexuality is bad , sexuality is out of place in many games , etc etc) , didn't have time to answer all of them so now we are debating just the objectification part.
I mean , I can link you quotes or something if you like , it's all here.
–- Update From New Post Merge ---
@Wagomu:
Objectification does not recognize consent. By definition. That you provided.
No , did you even read the wiki page? Objectification can be concensual, can be self-promoted and all sorts of other things. It only get's negative shades when talked from sex-negative feminists.