@Robby:
I don't have evidence of Gabbard being a Russian goon officially… (But she's definitely serving Russia's cause, whether she's being paid or not)
I don't understand what that entails and I find a conclusion that vague will only end up to be subjective in nature.
I really wonder what the current media would have done to JFK and his brother during the Cuban Missile Crisis that was about to lead to WW3. I guess Robert K and JFK would have been as labeled as Russian agents as well. You know since they met with Russian ambassadors to make a deal under the table…
@Robby:
Mueller's investigation was an extremely narrow scope, that was blocked by the powers of the president and cut short by the new AG, investigating something that the president wasn't even accused of, (A defacto Beforehand agreement) and he still found a TON of evidence of that sort of thing. Plus the 25+ ongoing FBI cases he turned stuff over to that weren't connected to that narrow scope. That basically everyone attached to Trump's campaign went to trial were found overwhelmingly guilty and all pled guilty?
Mueller report, page 10, came to the conclusion of "there is a lot of crime here, but the I'm being blocked by the powers of the office to get the documentation, so Congress needs to step in."
So before speaking about Mueller's investigation, you have to talk about the Steele Dossier which sparked it, which was false. Every detail inside false, according to the FBI.
Yet the investigation started. But lets go back further.
DJT Jr met with the Russians, and was being charged with treason on no basis or evidence. He met with Natalie V. the Russian as was reported by all media. They reported knowing false information, because Natalie worked for Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS was hired by the Clinton Campaign to create the Steele Dossier filled with lies. This is all corroborated with facts that the media ignores.
This is why Durham and Barr are investigating this mess if the FBI members like Comey, Mueller followed proper procedures, which they didn't.
And yes it was cut short, because if it had gone beyond the 2 years where they found nothing, it would have impacted the election in 2020. Therefore a politically motivated investigation would be ongoing and thus hurt Trump's possible re-election.
The media, on MSNBC and CNN quickly, very quickly stated regarding the Mueller report… "yes this vindicates Trump." Yet the whole story of collusion continued, but much much less over time. Why? - because real investigations are being done against the Russian Collusion narrative that has no basis or fact to support it. Again it's illegal to make these libel claims that have been made over the last 2 years. I wouldn't want to be in their shoes. And even if it's true, and Mueller stated there is a lot of crime here (I don't see it), and couldn't complete investigation or what not... it's very convenient. Once again you need evidence to make a statement even of that nature, which he never produced.
@Robby:
He was impeached for blackmailing Ukraine, and they didn't even hold a trial where they allowed witnesses or evidence, and half the chamber wasn't even there to listen to it before voting.
Democrats knew the impeachment would fail in the Senate. And there wasn't evidence to support claims of a crime.
@Green_vs_Red:
the fact he once got in front of cameras and lied about having never met Putin before when in fact he had
Trump stated he didn't know Putin. That's a great difference. I've met many people for instance in my life. I don't know them though. The media tried to pin this subtle lie - doing their best to connect Russia and Trump in collusion. What a joke. Again, even if he did meet Putin. And? Celebrities always meet world leaders. You need evidence again to propose that Trump had Russia's help to win the election. Imagine Gordon Ramsay in the UK running for PM, and then because he cooked for Putin years ago, he'd be labeled as a Russian asset.
This is more of a scandal. An instance of her pay to play scandal.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
@Green_vs_Red:
Let’s also ignore ignore when the conservative media makes up various lies and spreads misinformation about various people such as Obama, Hillary, or AOC and various other individuals or groups and mostly suffers no repercussions for that…..but yet when one of their reporters or contributors make brutally honest comments about Trump or his stupidity that necessitates a bitchy tweet from him or his supporters.
First, this isn't objective at all. But I'm glad you voiced your opinion, but you're not happy? Not happy that the 5-6 media corps that own most of all the branched out media outlets are all Left leaning? I'm almost certain it's above 90% of the media.
Fox was recently bought by Disney, and they'll fade away soon as a conservative voice. Transitioning fast would make too great of waves.
Conservatives don't have much media, besides Fox, and Breitbart. Others are jokes.
Also AOC is an easy target for the opposition, because she makes herself one for publicity, and plus, she's not bright at all. Tulsi in comparison carries herself professionally and argues her points intelligently.
@Green_vs_Red:
Lastly if Gabbard’s lawsuit against google is anything to go by this new lawsuit against Clinton stands a good chance of being thrown out.
It was also against Youtube, acting as if they are a publisher to remove her content, but they are just a platform. Google and Youtube are famous for censoring content. The Hillary lawsuit, is different.