@desa:
I know. Like I said I don't know when he got the title.
I mentioned several it's fine if he lost the title. It's the title itself being wrong that is my problem. Narration should be reliable information.
Kuina was crying about not being able to become the best and I interpretated the promise to be about that. But I guess it could just be holding a title claiming you're the best.
He did more than not correcting he confirmed it to Zoro and promised to stay the best.
Than it makes the interraction between Zoro and Mihawk fine since he is wrong instead of deceptive. Which was our discussion.
It stills make narration unreliable but that's another discussion.
His title is being the strongest swordsman. It's fine if people that aren't considered swordsman are stronger. If they are swordsman and stronger than it makes the narration wrong and the narration should be reliable.
If Oda find a way to keep the narration true and do wathever that's fine. If the narration box is simply wrong that's that's my problem. The narration should be reliable.
Those supplementary materials are getting annoying. I shouldn't have to discuss stuff from outside the manga. Didn't we establish the vivre are BS because they were wrong about when Shanks became an emperor or something similar?
Zoro could get it from whoever has/earned the title after Mihawk or get it from his accomplishments.Not everyone. Only some like Nami mapping the world.
Before he fought Shanks and became Shichi. But even if it was after, it was not Yonkou Shanks, who only became ready to be called such 6 years ago.
That´s your opinion, once again nothing to do with actual likelihood of events. And even then, 1) Whitebeard´s case, 2) narration was wrong several times purposely, since it reiterates what the world thinks most of the time, and not from a perspective of all knowing narrator.
And losing the title can only happen once he is beat, pretty easy concept man. If meanwhile a swordsman stronger appeared, but does not care about the title or simply did not have the opportunity to fight Mihawk yet, Mihawk still holds the title. That neither means he is a fraud, nor purposely is tricking people, it´s the natural flow of things.
You would need to fight every swordsman to be ultimately certain. Mihawk never met Vista, and at least he was not an opponent he could face easily and halfheartedly, meaning he had to get serious (contrast to Kaidou vs Luffy for example), yet Mihawk still holds the title.
Yep, see above.
Characters promising things that turn out wrong has been a leitmotif for the entire manga…
Once again see above. This is a matter of opinion, and technically, Mihawk holds the title, and the world believes he holds teh title, that´s all that matters.
You keep repeating yourself. The same thing happened with Whitebeard, like you said, it had "factors in it", which already makes things non-absolute, once again all that matters. Similar factors will be there for Mihawk.
Unlike previous databooks, Oda actually claimed to be personally involved, and also claimed it is a passion project, hence why they received and receive more legitimacy.
If you want to disregard them because of one mistake, sure that´s your prerogative, but it does not change much about the situation at hand either way.
Yep and we still need to see that fight, whoever against it is, you are talking besides the point. Zoro vs title holder will be his biggest fight in the manga, not an afterthought of a sparring session.