So Biden said, very truthfully, that white supremacy is the greatest threat US faces. And conservatives felt called out. (Gee I wonder why.)
But is also a case of pot calling the kettle black.
American Politics: A Brand New Day
-
-
Everyone point and laugh.
-
https://www.rawstory.com/ron-desantis-2660611532/
DeSantis learned well from Jeb Bush
-
Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes sentenced to 18 years in prison for plot to keep Trump in power
His attempt to argue for leniency, starting from here:
Stewart Rhodes speaks now
"I'm a politcal prisoner."
Rhodes blames the radical left of trying to shut down Trump and others
Stewart Rhodes is beginning his remarks with talk of Antifa
Rhodes: We protect people outside of Trump rallies.. against Antifa
Then accuses Antifa of targeting "unarmed victims"
Rhodes has launched into highly-charged, vitriolic politically-edged arguments. Accusing "the left" of targeting Trump and Trump supporters
Then he criticizes Proud Boys for "seeking fights"... saying OathKeepers are "quiet professionals"
Rhodes: "Antifa will throw bleach, urine and other substances you don't want in your eyes"
"Antifa will stab people"
He's arguing the OathKeepers wore "garb" on Jan 6 to defend themselves
Judge is sitting expression-less on the bench... as Rhodes unleashes these remarks about Antifa and the targeting of Trump supporters
He wrote these remarks down. He appears to be reading them off paper
Rhodes: "I want to make it very clear to the public... no OathKeeper took part in any of the fighting....." on Jan 6
Rhodes says he's got a "lot of police" in the OathKeepers...
Rhodes says, "I feel like I'm the lead character in Kafka's 'The Trial"
Rhodes alludes to efforts to "smear the MAGA movement"
Rhodes says the "media focused on the OathKeepers" .. "the OathKeepers and the Proud Boys.. the two groups the Left hates the most. Because we stop their violence in the street. And they don't like that"
Judge asks Rhodes to "wrap up"
Rhodes: "I always focused on what President Trump could do as the President to invoke the Insurrection Act"
Stewart Rhodes just now: "I believe this country is incredibly divided.. and this prosecution.. is making it worse"
Rhodes: "I cannot ignore the text of the Constitution. They have created a Constitutional crisis"
"Characterizing all Trump supporters as terrorists, racists and fools.. does not help"
-
No part in any of the fighting. Uh-huh. Sure.
-
@pariston_hill said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
Sure, and that was terrible, but that was also 1975.
If a man can't change and learn to be better in FIFTY YEARS,,,
-
@Robby said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
If a man can't change and learn to be better in FIFTY YEARS,,,
A man can, a politician on other hand...
-
I see that Tara Reade is once again in the news following her defection to Russia.
Here she is at a press conference with Maria Butina who you may remember for pleading guilty to conspiracy against the United States and acting as an unregistered foreign agent.
-
Didn't Biden barred whiteness on the sexual misconduct accusation against Thomas on during his appointment to the Supreme Court?
-
Damn I'm seeing people argue about "vote blue or the evil side wins" and a counterargument made is that the greatest setback in LGBT+ legislation has been happening under a Dem president, while the had majority in the house and tie-break in the senate.
And people going out of their way to say the Dems are not at fault, or that the Supreme Court is to blame because Hillary lost.
Really US politics to the general voter is: I want guy with blue tie or I want guy with non-communist red tie in the White House.
You guys are gonna slip into full fascism so fast I hope [redacted]. -
@pariston_hill said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
Damn I'm seeing people argue about "vote blue or the evil side wins" and a counterargument made is that the greatest setback in LGBT+ legislation has been happening under a Dem president, while the had majority in the house and tie-break in the senate.
And people going out of their way to say the Dems are not at fault, or that the Supreme Court is to blame because Hillary lost.
Really US politics to the general voter is: I want guy with blue tie or I want guy with non-communist red tie in the White House.
You guys are gonna slip into full fascism so fast I hope [redacted].I mean... it's not like the Democrats are the ones putting this legislature out. Simple fact is that a Republican House/Senate/Presidency has so much potential to be worse, especially now that they've turned LGBTQ into their primary punching bags. There's a reason the worst of this stuff is occurring in Red States as opposed to Blue, in at least one instance I think overriding a Democratic governor's attempt to veto.
Even if you don't like the Democrats, in and of themselves, you can't deny that the Republicans are objectively worse in just about any and every measure.
Day 861: "There's going to be a reckoning."
1/ Biden and Kevin McCarthy reached an agreement in principle to lift the debt limit and prevent a default on the federal debt. The plan suspends the borrowing limit for two years, caps federal discretionary spending increases at 1%, while defense spending increases would be limited to about 3.5%, as proposed in Biden's budget. The legislation also includes new work requirements for select social safety net programs, claws back unspent Covid-19 relief funds, reduces IRS funding, reallocates funds from the Inflation Reduction Act, and streamlines the process of issuing federal permits for energy projects. As part of a debt ceiling agreement, the freeze on federal student loan repayments will end at the end of the summer, which is when the Education Department had been preparing to restart payments. To avert a default, the Fiscal Responsibility Act needs be approved by both the House and the Senate and then signed by Biden before the Treasury Department's June 5 deadline. A vote in the House is expected as soon as Wednesday night. (New York Times / NBC News / Politico / Bloomberg / Washington Post / Wall Street Journal)
Why should I care? The U.S. debt ceiling plays a critical role in maintaining global financial stability. Failing to raise or suspend the debt limit risks a default on U.S. debts, causing a loss of confidence in the U.S. dollar and higher borrowing costs, as well as disruptions to financial markets. The broader impact would be an economic downturn. Hitting the debt ceiling would also disrupt government operations and services, potentially leading to delayed payments to beneficiaries of programs like Social Security, Medicare, and veterans' benefits.
2/ At least 20 conservative Republicans rejected the debt ceiling deal, with some members of the House Freedom Caucus threatening to force a vote to remove Kevin McCarthy as speaker if the bill is passed. Dan Bishop said McCarthy "capitulated" to Democrats and suggested that he plans to trigger the formal process to remove the speaker. "I'm fed up with the lies. I'm fed up with the lack of courage, the cowardice," Bishop said, adding: "Nobody could have done a worse job." Under new rules this year, a single Republican can bring a no-confidence vote to the floor to remove the speaker. Chip Roy, another member of the House Freedom Caucus, added: "Not one Republican should vote for this bill. We will continue to fight it today, tomorrow, and no matter what happens, there's going to be a reckoning about what just occurred unless we stop this bill by tomorrow." Several prominent conservative groups, meanwhile, publicly threatened to downgrade any Republican lawmaker who supports the bill. (NBC News / New York Times / Politico / Bloomberg / CNBC / Washington Post / Wall Street Journal)
3/ The Texas House voted to impeach Attorney General Ken Paxton over allegations of bribery and abuse of office. A Republican-led House General Investigating Committee filed 20 articles of impeachment against Paxton last week, citing a "long-standing pattern of abuse of office and public trust," including alleged bribery and obstruction of justice. The investigation began after Paxton requested that the Legislature pay the $3.3 million settlement from a whistleblower lawsuit against him. The Senate impeachment trial to determine whether Paxton should be permanently removed from office will start no later than Aug. 28. Ted Cruz called Paxton's impeachment a "travesty." (Texas Tribune / New York Times / Axios / Washington Post / NBC News / Dallas Morning News)
4/ Trump's aides directed his lawyer to not search Trump's Mar-a-Lago office for classified documents, despite a subpoena ordering Trump to return all documents still in his possession that were marked as classified. After Evan Corcoran completed his search of the Mar-a-Lago storage room and found 38 classified documents, he asked if he should search anywhere else. Several Trump aides, however, waved him off, assuring him that no documents would be found in Trump's office. Corcoran then handed over the documents to the Justice Department and drafted an affidavit saying all the classified documents were turned over to the "best of my knowledge." Corcoran had a fellow attorney, Christina Bobb, certify the letter, which attested to a "diligent search." The FBI later recovered more than 100 classified documents at Mar-a-Lago – including some from Trump's office. In total, more than 300 classified documents were retrieved from Mar-a-Lago. (The Guardian)
poll/ 63% of Republican voters say Trump is their strongest candidate to beat Biden in 2024, while 32% say another Republican candidate would be a stronger candidate. (Monmouth University Poll)
https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_US_053023/
Regarding the debt limit increase, I'm going to steal an explanation an acquaintance on another forum provided for specifics
As it stands the deal includes:
- Raises the debt ceiling. The agreement would increase the debt limit for two years, so at least we don't have to worry about doing this all over again in an election year. Republicans are gonna throw a fit since they wanted to do this again next year.
- Caps non-defense spending. Spending will remain flat in '24 and only allowed to increase by 1% in '25. The Republicans wanted a spending cap of 10 years, they only got two. If Democrats win back the House in 2024, I suspect this will be discarded.
Protects veterans’ medical care. Even the Republicans weren't stupid enough to touch this. - Expands work requirements. Raises the age from 49 to 54 for childless able bodied adults to continue working 20 hours a week to maintain full SNAP support. Veterans, the homeless, and other qualified groups will get expanded exemptions. These increased work requirements will expire in 2030. No increased work requirements for Medicaid, despite Republican insistence on that.
- Return unspent Covid funds. This was one of the first things agreed upon, and I don't think anyone really cared about that much. How much is actually even left is unknown.
- Cut Internal Revenue Service funding. The Republican boogeyman. They wanted to defund the IRS entirely of the $80 billion it got from the Biden's IRA, but my understanding is the cut isn't even a tenth of that.
- Restart student loan repayments. The moratorium on student loan payments will end, though when exactly is unclear. Biden's student loan forgiveness plan will remain in place, though it's still paused by the courts.
-
If a Republican was in the White House, these anti-LBGT measures would be happening at the Federal level rather than in individual states. They're all in on this again because they have nothing else to run with.
-
@sgamer82 said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
I mean...
No I agree that Republicans are worse, I'm just saying that it don't appear to pass in the minds of the dem voter that you can press your politicians to be more combative, that the president don't have ways to pressure republican senators or congressman to vote with the democrats.
It's like the President cargo is merely decorative, and all the times the Democrats fail to enshrine legislation is because the odds were immensely backed at them or they couldn't fight the republican vote.
Isn't there a state congresswoman in Montana using her filibuster right to avoid voting on anti trans legislation and by that forcing the house not to vote on anything? Do more that.
-
@Ubiq said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
If a Republican was in the White House, these anti-LBGT measures would be happening at the Federal level rather than in individual states.
Yes, and why did the Democrats failed to make Roe vs Wade federal law between Biden getting the job and the House election last year? Wasn't that a campaign pledge?
Didn't LBJ forced his way with Southern Democrats to pass the Civil Rights Bill? Why Biden don't even try to do it with Manchin and Simena?
-
A federal bill to protect abortion would have required sixty votes in the Senate to pass.
-
@pariston_hill said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
@Ubiq said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
If a Republican was in the White House, these anti-LBGT measures would be happening at the Federal level rather than in individual states.
Yes, and why did the Democrats failed to make Roe vs Wade federal law between Biden getting the job and the House election last year? Wasn't that a campaign pledge?
Because we didn't vote in enough senators. It was a 50/50 split, and even that was a technicality since 2 of them weren't voting with the Dems on anything. Dems had the majority on paper only, for all intents and purposes they were in the minority and it's pretty amazing they got through as much as they did..
And even if that wasn't the case, they'd need 60 votes to codify anything and they were nowhere near that for abortion.
-
@Ubiq said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
If a Republican was in the White House, these anti-LBGT measures would be happening at the Federal level rather than in individual states. They're all in on this again because they have nothing else to run with.
That and thanks to Trump they have cronies in the Supreme & Federal Courts to heighten the chances that courts will sign off on this .
-
I'm aware of the fine minuta of the approving of a bill by the US Senate, what I calling on is:
i) Why doesn't the Democratic Party don't pressure the two senators that constantly vote against the campaign pledges of it's president;
ii) Why the President and the party don't do more to manage to pass it's campaign promises;
iii) Why Dem voter base acts like the system and checks and balances is working "properly", and why one party gets a pass on using it's ineffectiveness to pass their agenda and the other not (I kinda know this one already and has to do with the framing the bourgeoisie media gives to the polices being passed);
iv) Why people keep pretending both parties are antagonistic when both of them are bourgeoisie parties whose main difference is their MO; why don't force the hand and make a concession in one side and and take the gain in other? Why keep the theatrics? I'm sure that agreeing for more austerity, more police force, more military spending (which both sides are okay with) they could do environmental or legal protection at federal level (not much to don't disenfranchise voter bases);
v) Why the hell the Dem voter base don't press it's representatives harder to achieve or at least fight a lost battle but FIGHT IN for their agenda?It's really like here: The Right can do whatever the fuck they want and it will be presented as a good for the economy or as a loss on the left. Like one side has to be the grown up and contain the damage of a spoiled brat instead of actually doing what they promised to do.
-
@pariston_hill said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
I'm aware of the fine minuta of the approving of a bill by the US Senate, what I calling on is:
i) Why doesn't the Democratic Party don't pressure the two senators that constantly vote against the campaign pledges of it's president;With regards to this one in particular, what would doing so accomplish unless they need a simple majority (they're currently 51/49 in senate) or otherwise have enough Republican votes to pass whatever they're trying to pass?
On the flip side, at least for Joe Manchin, presumably one of the two, he's a blue senator in a red state, and democrats have nobody else who can win that particular race. Letting him vote against stuff when it won't affect the outcome hurts nothing and gives him something to tout back home.
That said, Manchin and Sinema (who I assume is the second) have been a pain in those simple majority scenarios. For better or worse Manchin is mostly sincere in his voting, while Sinema has proven herself an opportunist. Unfortunately there's only so much pressure to apply because Manchin holds a key seat and Sinema doesn't care unless she's bought and I'm not sure she even counts as a Democrat at this point.
Also, in spite of these handicaps, the Biden administration has done a lot, not least of which were the American Rescue Act and Inflation Reduction Acts, and just now with the debt ceiling we're getting progress with very minimal concessions. The Republicans are getting barely a fraction of what they were demanding.
-
@pariston_hill said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
I'm sure that agreeing for more austerity, more police force, more military spending (which both sides are okay with)Republicans have been hazy on this
v) Why the hell the Dem voter base don't press it's representatives harder to achieve or at least fight a lost battle but FIGHT IN for their agenda?
They have tried this most notably with Sinema
-
Day 862: "No margin for error."
1/ The bipartisan deal to suspend the debt ceiling and limit federal spending cleared a major procedural hurdle in the House. The House voted 241-187 to formally consider the debt ceiling bill. While setting the rules for debate is nearly always decided along party lines, Kevin McCarthy needed 52 votes from Democrats to offset 29 Republican "no" votes. A final vote on the debt ceiling is expected later Wednesday – days ahead of the June 5 default deadline. If approved, it would then move to the Senate, where conservatives could force days of debate. "I cannot stress enough that we have no margin – no margin – for error," Chuck Schumer warned. "Either we proceed quickly and send this bipartisan agreement to the president's desk or the federal government will default for the first time ever." (New York Times / Washington Post / Politico / Wall Street Journal / Bloomberg / CNBC / CNN)
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/us-debt-ceiling-deadline-talks-05-31-23/index.html
What are the consequences of default? A U.S. default would likely cause severe disruption to financial markets worldwide – including declines in the value of your retirement savings and other investments. A default could also result in a recession, which may lead to job losses, hiring freezes, and increased borrowing costs for the U.S. government. Higher interest payments on government debt potentially leads to increased budget deficits, which impact government spending.
2/ Federal prosecutors obtained an audio recording of Trump acknowledging that he held onto a classified document after leaving the White House. On the July 2021 recording, Trump indicates that he wanted to share the classified document about a potential attack on Iran but the attendees didn't have sufficient security clearances. The meeting was with two people working on the autobiography of Mark Meadows. The recording suggests that Trump understood he retained classified material, contrary to his repeated claims that he could retain presidential records and "automatically" declassify documents. Special counsel Jack Smith's investigation has focused on the meeting as part of the criminal investigation into Trump's handling of classified documents after leaving the White House. (CNN)
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/31/politics/trump-tape-classified-document-iran-milley/index.html
Why should I care? Government documents are classified to protect national security. Document classification ensures that sensitive information, like intelligence sources, defense strategies, diplomatic relations, and details about ongoing operations are safeguarded from unauthorized access or disclosure.
An employee at Mar-a-Lago was questioned by investigators about moving boxes of documents following a government request for surveillance footage. A Mar-a-Lago employee who was captured on video assisting a Trump aide in moving boxes on June 2, the day before classified material was collected in response to a subpoena, has been repeatedly questioned by investigators. In mid-July, authorities also scrutinized the employee's involvement in a separate subpoena seeking security camera footage, as he allegedly had a conversation with an IT worker regarding camera functionality and data retention. The employee claimed innocence, stating that the conversation was unrelated to hiding information from authorities and that they were unaware of the investigation or subpoena at the time. (Washington Post)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/05/30/trump-mar-a-lago-surveillance-camera/
3/ Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo signed legislation that protects access to abortion for out-of-state patients. The legislation codifies an existing executive order from the former governor, which banned Nevada officials and agencies from assisting with out-of-state investigations that could lead to the prosecution of people who travel to Nevada seeking abortion care. The bill also ensures that in-state medical boards, commissions, and licensing committees cannot discipline or disqualify physicians who provide abortion care. (Associated Press / NBC News / The Hill)
4/ The Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that two state laws banning abortion are unconstitutional because they require a "medical emergency" before a doctor can perform an abortion. The court said the laws violated the Oklahoma Constitution, which provides an inherent right for a woman to terminate a pregnancy to save her own life. The ruling, however, will not restore full abortion access in the state because Oklahoma's 1910 ban on abortion remains in effect, which made intentionally performing an abortion a felony unless "necessary to preserve her life." (The Oklahoman / Politico / KOSU / The Hill)
5/ The woman who accused Biden of sexual assault during the 2020 presidential race defected to Russia. Tara Reade appeared at an event hosted by the Russian state news outlet Sputnik and said she will apply for Russian citizenship. "I feel really happy to be here, and I feel safe," Reade said from Russia. Biden has strongly denied the allegation that he sexually assaulting Reade while she was working in his Senate office in 1993, saying the alleged assault "unequivocally, it never, never happened. It didn't. It never happened." Members of his Senate staff at the time said Reade never went to them with her claim of harassment. The event also featured convicted Russian agent Maria Butina, who promised to ask Putin "to fast track her citizenship request." The White House declined to directly comment, saying: "I won't attempt to speak for an aspiring Russian citizen, the convicted Russian spy who's sponsoring her, or the foreign government with which she has chosen to align." (CNN / NPR / CBS News / The Guardian / Insider)
https://www.npr.org/2023/05/31/1179158199/tara-reade-biden-sexual-assault-russian-citizenship
-
@pariston_hill Fucking violence against us all.
-
Again, as a Arizonian, I apologize for Sinema. :/
-
@pariston_hill truthfully as a politician they normally say this because they are also racist in the closet given Biden voted against black voters many years ago before becoming president FYI
-
1/ A group of Republicans threatened to delay plans to fast-track the House-passed bill to suspend the debt ceiling and limit federal spending before Monday's default deadline. Lindsey Graham said he'd keep the Senate tied up "until Tuesday" unless he received assurances that there would be a supplemental funding bill to spend more money on the military than the debt limit deal allowed. Under the bill, defense spending would be capped at $886 billion next year – a 3% increase – which Susan Collins called "woefully inadequate." Biden needs to sign the debt ceiling bill into law by Monday to avoid a default. "Time is a luxury the Senate does not have if we want to prevent default," Chuck Schumer said. "June 5 is less than four days away. At this point, any needless delay or any last-minute holdups would be an unnecessary and even dangerous risk." (CNBC / Washington Post / New York Times / Associated Press / NBC News / Bloomberg / Wall Street Journal)
2/ The Senate passed a Republican effort to overturn Biden's plan to cancel up to $20,000 in federal student loans for 43 million borrowers. Biden has promised to veto the measure. The legislation would also repeal the freeze on student loan repayment and limit the Education Department's ability to cancel student loans in the future. It passed in a 52-46 vote, with two Democrats and one independent senator joining with Republicans. (Associated Press / CNBC / Politico / USA Today / NBC News)
Why should I care? Imagine you and your friends want to play at the arcade, but some of them don't have enough allowance left because they owe money. Or maybe some of your friends live in neighborhoods where they don't get as much allowance or have to use it for other things, and so they don't get to play at the arcade as often. If their parents cancel this debt, they would have more money to spend at the arcade, which means more fun for everyone and more business for the arcade. This is similar to how student loan forgiveness can help people from different backgrounds have the same chances to learn and succeed. Student loan forgiveness isn't just about money; it's about fairness and giving everyone an equal shot at success.
3/ The largest property insurer in California will stop selling coverage to homeowners because of the state's "rapidly growing catastrophe exposure." State Farm, which insures more homeowners in California than any other company, cited wildfire risk, rising construction costs, and challenges with reinsurance (which is when insurance companies buy their own insurance coverage). Disasters linked to climate change have caused $33 billion in damages since 2017 in the state. (New York Times / E&E News / Politico / Grist / Curbed)
4/ Humans have pushed Earth past seven of the eight safety limits related to planetary health and human well-being. A study by the Earth Commission found that only air pollution wasn't already in "the danger zone," revealing that significant damage to the planet is already occurring even before breaching the globally agreed 1.5 degree Celsius warming threshold. This study also introduced the concept of "justice" when quantifying what's safe for the planet and people by incorporating factors such as human well-being, air pollution, overuse of fertilizers, groundwater supplies, the health of fresh surface water, and the overall natural and human-built environment. The study concludes that humans are taking "colossal risks with the future of civilization and everything that lives on Earth." (Associated Press / The Guardian)
Why should I care? Climate change directly impacts our lives and the future of our planet. It affects the well-being of communities, threatens biodiversity, and jeopardizes our economic stability. By addressing climate change, we can protect vulnerable populations, preserve the natural world, create a sustainable economy, and ensure a safe and livable future for ourselves and generations to come.
5/ Two Alabama congressional representatives want to block funding for U.S. Space Command's temporary headquarters in Colorado. The two lawmakers submitted a draft House bill seeking to block the Biden administration from spending money on SPACECOM until "an official decision" is made on the location of its permanent headquarters, which the Trump administration said would be in Huntsville, Alabama. The Biden administration, however, has considered reversing the planned move to Alabama over concerns about the state's near-total ban on abortion. (NBC News / The Hill / AL.com)
poll/ 84% of Americans who don't identify as LGBTQ support equal rights for the LGBTQ community. 70% of non-LGBTQ Americans agree that companies should publicly support the LGBTQ community through hiring practices, advertising, and sponsorships. (GLAAD)
https://www.glaad.org/publications/accelerating-acceptance-2023
-
F'ing traitor Dem's. We elect you because you are the only party in the US that is even remotely based in reality, and then some of you go off and vote with the extremist party that we explicitly voted against, anyway.
No way in hell should that have passed the Senate. Please tell me that Biden is going to veto this.
Note: This is not a condemnation of all Democrats, nor is it a "both parties are the same, so don't bother voting" message. 100% vote for Democrats. Vote for so many Democrats that these traitors like Manchin don't decide anything.
-
@Envy based on reality? I hardly doubt it given some democrats I know are more out of touch compared to rinos or GOPTYAI gang. There’s a thing in the political world. It’s called good acting now if you excuse me? I have to research on the upcoming bankruptcy for my home soon.
-
@Envy said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
"both parties are the same, so don't bother voting"
Both parties ARE the same.
Do bother voting either to find out someone who will actually do something for working people or to no let the ghouls consolidate power. -
@sgamer82 said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
2/ The Senate passed a Republican effort to overturn Biden's plan to cancel up to $20,000 in federal student loans for 43 million borrowers. Biden has promised to veto the measure. The legislation would also repeal the freeze on student loan repayment and limit the Education Department's ability to cancel student loans in the future. It passed in a 52-46 vote, with two Democrats and one independent senator joining with Republicans. (Associated Press / CNBC / Politico / USA Today / NBC News)
sigh
oh well. I do like the arcade simile, although now I'm thinking any grumbling boomer that opposed the plan would be like "what arcades, i worked 90 hours a week for my money, damn kids with their vidya games"
edit: OF FUCKING COURSE it was sinema and manchin, jesus christ these two
-
@pariston_hill said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
Both parties ARE the same.
Do bother voting either to find out someone who will actually do something for working people or to no let the ghouls consolidate power.They're 100% not; even a cursory look at what Republicans are actually doing in the states they control compared to what Democrats are doing in states like Minnesota immediately exposes that belief as complete nonsense.
-
I know trying to apply a black and white view on morality to politics is usually not a wise decision at all.....but I think in this case, it's pretty clear cut that the Republicans are the modern-day bad guy of the U,S, They're just a bunch of hate-filled, greedy bastards who make everything worse for everyone.
-
@Ubiq Their approach is world apart, but what they end up doing is the same: protect the interest of the bourgeoisie class.
Much like Disney back politicians of both parties, all that class do so in other to preserve their wealth and status quo.Republicans act on behalf of poor white folks that drink up the racist and chauvinistic kool aid of Reagan and his ilk and on behalf of racist billionaires that want to be like 1880s Robber Barons.
Democrats act on behalf of urban middle class ABC progressives and of billionaires that rather not be outed as racist or bigoted.
I've been asking close to two or three years now here, why exactly that they pick up the Trans people to throw under the bus? Well I think I reached my conclusion they are attacking the weakest link of the working class.
If they succeed in it, they will go for the next, and the next and the next, and they minute it reaches you you're back to 6 day 14h journeys at work. Every single aspect of gov't will be privatized, the environment will be caustic and you will be happy that at least you didn't voted on the party that caused it (only the one that abided it). -
"Two centuries ago, a former European colony decided to catch up with Europe. It succeeded so well that the United States of America became a monster, in which the taints, the sickness and the inhumanity of Europe have grown to appalling dimensions." - Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth, Conclusion chapter.
Neither US or Europe (and Japan, might as well go with what the Western Media calls the International Community into it) dealt with the legacy of violence, racism, exploitation and alienation they caused and continue to cause in the global south.
Failing to deal with the racist and colonial mentality of the past left a great deal of the population to keep it alive and it burst forefront when capitalists crisis cause the wester middle class and lower to suffer materialistic.
So, they can't attack the system that brings the superior material wealth to their counterparts world wide, it's left to them to call back racist and colonialist arguments to their impoverishment. The problem is not us, is THEM.
The Republican party just makes a better use of these strokes of unrest to gain or keep power. Yes the Republicans are the bad guys, but they are upfront in their awfulness, they say "we will fuck the many to safe the few and if you vote on us you're one of the few" out loud.
The Democrats don't say it out loud, but since is impossible to reform capitalism from inside they abide to do the same but promise to fight against it on the next election, on the next gov't, etc. They represent perfectly Malcolm X quote on the white liberals.
Of course like @Ubiq said, Democrats in lesser rich states can have some better root support to implement protections, but it doesn't mean that if they lose state control it can't or won't be reverted.
-
@Johnny-B-Decent said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
Again, as a Arizonian, I apologize for Sinema. :/
Don’t know why when she should be apologizing to every person that voted for her that she then promptly fucked over.
Along with lying about stuff like being chased into a bathroom stall.
@pariston_hill said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
Republicans act on behalf of poor white folks
That’s what they tell you when in reality a lot of Republican policies involve fucking over the poor and most vulnerable which would include many Republican voters people who rely on things like Food Stamps/SNAP and the Affordable Care Act.
-
@Time-Control-Magician said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
That’s what they tell you when in reality a lot of Republican policies involve fucking over the poor and most vulnerable which would include many Republican voters people who rely on things like Food Stamps/SNAP and the Affordable Care Act.
My use of "ACT" was in the pretense way, they pretend to advocate for the first but only work for the later. And poor white folk while gladly eat shit as long as minorities are beneath them.
-
@JulieYBM said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
Elon Musk is going to kill kids.
Like Tesla's autopilot isn't already doing it.
-
@JulieYBM didn’t this woman have a criminal record?
-
@Nitwit said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
@JulieYBM didn’t this woman have a criminal record?
None that I know of. Furthermore, anything Erin Reed has or has not done would be besides the point. Musk is going to harm kids by lobbying for the banning of life-saving healthcare for them.
-
@pariston_hill said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
@JulieYBM said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
Elon Musk is going to kill kids.
Like Tesla's autopilot isn't already doing it.
Well read man I see.
-
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Nilitch said in American Politics: A Brand New Day:
Aren't people complaining about Elon Musk on his own social media already giving "a dime" to him ?
Literally every website ever has ads and therefore gets money out of us. That doesn't change the fact that Twitter (which should be a public utility) is a huge part of getting out information and bridging marginalized communities.
Furthermore, most ads can be blocked thanks to plug-ins, so...yeah, it's not likely most of the people criticizing that piece of shit are actually giving him money.
-
A federal judge rejects Tennessee's anti-drag law as too broad and vague
https://www.npr.org/2023/06/03/1179990709/tennessee-drag-show-law-ruling
Tennessee's first-in-the-nation law designed to place strict limits on drag shows is unconstitutional, a federal judge says.
The law is both "unconstitutionally vague and substantially overbroad" and encouraged "discriminatory enforcement," according to the ruling late Friday by U.S. District Judge Thomas Parker, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump.
"There is no question that obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment. But there is a difference between material that is 'obscene' in the vernacular, and material that is 'obscene' under the law," Parker said.
"Simply put, no majority of the Supreme Court has held that sexually explicit — but not obscene — speech receives less protection than political, artistic, or scientific speech," he said.
The law would have banned adult cabaret performances from public property or anywhere minors might be present. Performers who broke the law risked being charged with a misdemeanor or a felony for a repeat offense.
Parker used the example of a female performer wearing an Elvis Presley costume and mimicking the iconic musician who could be at risk of punishment under the drag law because they would be considered a "male impersonator."