King Cannon, the entire argument about Sheepshead is because you missed the horns that I was trying to show you. Look again.
http://i.imgur.com/391vyKT.pngWhether they are artificial or not does not change the fact that those horns, when he transforms, disappear from his head and appear on his fists. I am talking about the black horns, not the sheep’s horns.
Are you sure that's his head horn? They look like just the end of his arm horn.
Because his other arm horn certainly doesn't have that.
Finally, King Cannon, this is not going anywhere. The arguments you provided do not solve the issue. We are just going in circles, and you are losing your patience, & are using the straw man & ad hominem fallacies. This argument about Monet won’t get us farther as it clearly doesn’t make much sense, and it will just leave ill feelings between us, which is something I do not desire to happen. Let’s just agree to disagree about Monet.
Fine (although I do not remember insulting you). I just find really weird that Monet would not be willing to change her body permanently through surgery, but would be willing to change her body permanently (which would to be the case as she can't change back to her human form) through an artificial fruit. She should be aware of the risks of a SMILE fruit.
Same end result, just different means, so we can't really call her unreasonable when she decided to be part bird regardless of the means.