I'm challenging my recent ban not only because "a dumbass", which frankly is just lack of tact, but frankly was a quick pull on their trigger finger.
Yesterday I was flamed out of my mind because I was so speechless on how petty this whole manhatten bombing was, with the bombers in mind. A user felt it was necessary to twist my words to act like this event is small, that the bombing was also small and thus irrelevant. This is not the case. A moderator, who clearly has relation to this incident, told me to shut up after clarifying. I quickly corrected him/her whatever that I'm not the one picking a fight here, just someone word twisting my original post.
Then today, I saw there was an earthquake in the middle east and made a point of it, stating it would sure suck if the aftershocks hit the east coast like years ago. Where a user claimed I was being "inconsiderate" by not stating the 30 or so people that died. Unfortunately I did not see they had a damage toll, just that the earthquake that happened, so I quickly pointed that out to get banned.
For what reason? Nothing I said was intended to be offensive, nor was snarky, it was just simply discussion fodder. And "being a dumb ass" doesn't really answer my question besides someone who is emotionally involved is reading it as if I have a spiteful intention. Again, I request it's looked into because this is ridiculous, and anyone is welcome to read the posts to point out the offensive content, or even anything that can be taken out of context.