@square:
I probably shouldn't keep this going, but I consider this vastly more interesting than Naruto.
I assume you're aware of the concept of interpretation, and I also assume you're aware of the fact that the written word doesn't not always have a literal intent. So, the recipient holds the power over interpretation, right? A random asshole's words don't have to mean anything if you dismiss the author as a random asshole.
Of course, not everyone is logically inclined, but I don't believe people should be afraid of writing what they feel like for fear of offending some type of person they're not even sure are currently around.
And, that random asshole could never be judged as such anyway, if the phrases labeling him that way were outlawed.
The "logic vs emotion" dichotomy you're presenting is fictitious. There is no logic in being unaffected by actual words directed at you. Words from anyone, anywhere, regardless of how full the person feels, or their being the faintest shadow of a rando online, have the power to hurt someone and it's not Strong to not be affected by it. If you are not hurt, it is likely that for you and you alone, you cannot relate the words to your own life, or that you have a wall yourself that can not be affected, but it's highly selfish either way.
It's, again, an assumption that discounts varying degrees of ableness and mental fortitude. These are not on a sliding scale of "weak" to "strong" at all, so this isn't something someone just Trains to get better at. There are varying degrees of exhaustion that can lead to things hurting more, or less. It's totally 100% victim-blaming and self-centered ableist attitude to assume that everyone can just… Brush stuff off.
Just be accepting of people's variances. That's all. You don't have to argue against them. To try to present the idea of
"everyone is a jerk" only lets jerks get away with it, it normalizes awful behaviour. Don't let jerks get away with it. End of story. End of debate. This is all. Just think on it some.