We all have been saying this because we've never read the manga.
We have however seen the art and heard the premise and frankly the worst bit was you rationalizing it as a father/daughter thing which damn near made me vomit.
As far as I know, there are some people who have read the manga who are upset about others thinking that Lotte's Toy is lolicon pedoshit while it's actually a lighthearted story about a single father raising that succubus kid,
Normal people, and actual quality things, don't operate off the premise of a semen devouring prepubescent child. See, real literature and all that cuts the bullshit premises. Which generally would be things like "FORBIDDEN ROMANCE DRAMA ACTION TUXEDO."
Let's not even get into "SEMEN DEVOURING CHILD DEMON".
I can't believe I even have to explain this shit.
You will never find a good story from someone who uses that premise.
well, that' what I heard. I also don't believe it at first, but the guys who have read the manga are ALWAYS saying "IT'S NOT LIKE THAT AT ALL DESPITE THE SYNOPSIS GIVEN, READ THE MANGA ALREADY!" many, many times at the people who think Lotte's Toy is actually about what they think it is. So, yeah, I'm pretty much doubtful myself.
Nigga, you ain't talking' to nobody and are just advertising yourself.
That's why I'm saying, why don't we check it ourselves whether it's like that or not?
Because it's about a deliberately sexualized child.
Also whos the fruit in your avatar.
Get a cool character forchrisakes.