@Sabo:
First off… the guy never said anything like what I have underlined, so why even assume thats what he wants?
Also... Odas been having all the fights like what you have their in the Edit post. Why change it? I mean you can spice it up with variety, and have some characters take out masses of enemys (which all the strawhats do anyways), but you should also have the in depth 1 on 1 fights, where backstories can (and will) pop up.
....... So... if someone say, punches people hard, do they rip off their hands to stop them from being dangerous....
You make us 2010 posters look bad :getlost:
aite. first of all, who are u to tell me i make 2010 look bad? i just read through the last 30 posts you have made, every one of them as bad/useless as the next.
next. it has never been a problem in other fights, but now that their crew is 9 people, to create in depth 1on 1 fights, u will devote 20 chapters very easily to it. think of water 7, now imagine it with robin fighting and brooke fighting. with this said, i nvr at all said i hated in depth story. i always loved it. sadly there are many people who complain about it, such as the idiots who aren't happy with one piece because there aren't any epic fighting after a month. now imagine these guys waiting for a fight because of a 5 month long (1 chapter every week = 4 every month , 20 /4 = 5 months) development.
next. no one cares how pirates are treated. hence magellan and shiliew being allowed to execute anyone, anytime. especially with fishman being called disgusting, and discriminated by humans, i would not expect fishman prisoner to be allowed to have their daily cup of tea. his nose was drawn broken again after he fixed it. frankly i would think there is a reason for that. And my examples were just examples, the point (which ur small fragmented mind obviuosly did not get) was that they removed his nose for one reason or another. if you want me to explain specific theories with pictures drawn out, gl. these are all theories, and all theories are stupid, until proven true. what i dont understand is how someone (you) can possibly throw an idea down instantly.