What do you get when you take a slasher film, mix it with teletubbies (yes, I said teletubbies instead of care bares), and turn it into a game?
You get this, my friends:
l8iqMahvTA8
sIZzCiAGz-k
rINJvppUdao
ewgNwg171I4
Comes out in 2 days.
Naughty Bear
-
-
It looks like it could be quite a fun game. But also looks like one that'll be super cheap soon. So I think I'll wait and get it cheap.
-
I gots no boobtube. What's the name of the game?
-
Do you think there are any female bears?
-
@Cyan:
Do you think there are any female bears?
Maybe, but they'll be killed like all the others.
-
Holy wow. Lookit the reviews it's getting.
Looks like I'll definitely be waiting for this one to go cheap. Or just buy GTA/Worms again.
-
Saw it before, still looks horrible to me.
I'm gonna reach for the stars~~~
-
Saw it before, still looks horrible to me.
I liked the little trailers. But they look just to be cutscenes. Gameplay just looks like it'll be repetitive.
-
I read this in a magazine about a week ago, and still to this day I find the concept hilarious.
Grand Theft Auto meets teddy bears. Stuffing replacing blood. Teddy bears being pushed into killing themselves.
If I saw this when I was a kid, I'd be traumatized, but now… :devil:
-
-
http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?search=naughty+bear&numrev=3&site=
Yeah. Looks like most places thus far think it's shit.
Shame
-
Yeah. Gamecentral, one of the few reviewers I trust, panned it.
http://www.metro.co.uk/tech/833605-games-review-naughty-bear-isnt-just-bad-hes-downright-awful
-
Wow Buuhan, can't believe you made a thread on a game that sucks total shit.
Then again I guess you didn't expect it to be this bad..
Just read the gamecentral article and found:
A2M (the team behind last year's WET)
Well, I guess devs this bad really can't make a good game.
-
I got WET for £10 a few weeks back.
I'm actually enjoying it somewhat. Just gets a lil repetitive. Wouldn't say it's amazing or worth the full amount tho.
Can't complain for a tenner.
-
Thank you for warning us not to buy this game
-
@ZeArmyOfHalen:
Wow Buuhan, can't believe you made a thread on a game that sucks total shit.
Then again I guess you didn't expect it to be this bad..
Just read the gamecentral article and found:
Well, I guess devs this bad really can't make a good game.Can you really blame me? Just look at it. XD
But yeah… it's not good. Granted I'm only on the second episode. There's two huge factors that ruins it: Repetitiveness and Frame-rate. I never get when reviewers mention frame-rate cause I never experience it, but I sure do in this. It's like I'm playing it on my PC, which let me clarify has no graphics card and only 300mb RAM. Only time the game runs smooth is after everyone's dead and you're the only thing left moving around.
But by then there's nothing left to do but go to the next area, which brings me to the previous complaint of repetitiveness. Have to talk about that later as the PS3 browser won't let me type larger messages, piece of shit...
-
This game is fucking awful, it becomes stupid difficult on episode 3 (and there's 7), too. GameFly can take this shit back. Never have I seen such a great concept suck so bad that its own great concept can only muster "Fuck…" in reply.
-
this game was clearly doomed from the start. it's just happy tree friends with a different art style!
-
some rly have ideas for games…
just fucking unbelieveable how they got the job^^Unrevealed: Loki/Rocks/the man marked by flames/Im-san
Island: Elbaf/Raftel/GodValley
Unresolved: Weevil´s plan/Joy-Boy/Zunisha´s story/Rocks flashback/Void Century/Rioponeglyph/Uranus/the D.clan
DFWind/Metal/Acid/Liquid/Time-Stop
-
@Don:
some rly have ideas for games…
just fucking unbelieveable how they got the job^^Both this and WET were both pretty hyped in shops prior to release.
I'd imagine they both sold quite a bit because of this.
-
Conker did this better.
