Yep, not feeling it. Again visually stunning, again lacking the feeling.
At least this actress can actually sing and isn't just being auto-tuned.
Yep, not feeling it. Again visually stunning, again lacking the feeling.
At least this actress can actually sing and isn't just being auto-tuned.
Yeah. I'm gonna be staying away from these live action remakes. They're just not grabbing me. Maybe if Disney didn't play it safe and try making them a little more different from the originals I'd give them a chance. And it looks like we're not seeing the end of them anytime soon since they keep making money.
On a more positive note, I just starting watching The Owl House. I was immediately reminded of Discworld with the way it mocks and pays homage to fantasy tropes at the same time. While it doesn't have as many laughs as something like Gravity Falls, I still feel the same energy behind the writing. And on that note, King is definitely my favorite character. He kind of reminds me a bit of Chopper, with a bit of Salem from Sabrina the Teenage Witch.
Every live action remake Disney has done so far has been far worse than the original it’s based off of
It rakes in the cash I get that but that’s about the only good thing I can say about them
I do think it would be hilarious if we got Chris Hemsworth as Hercules and Tom Hiddleston as Hades in the live action remake of Hercules HAHAHA
The Disney films that are alternate versions like Pete's Dragon or either version of The Jungle Book can be solid but the ones that are straight remakes have consistently been downgrades from the original. It doesn't help either that they've avoided remaking films with substantial problems that might be fixed but have been focusing on more well received films that still look great even today. For instance, why not do a complete overhaul of Home on the Range? Nobody will be angry if you do that and there's a decent chance you'd make more money than the original did.
Far as the trailer goes, the song sounds okay up until that "be"; as is, the delivery throws off the pace of the entire song by drawing out a word in the middle of the sentence and shifts the focus from the sad trailing "world" off at the end.
@Shiebs said in Disney animation thread:
I do think it would be hilarious if we got Chris Hemsworth as Hercules and Tom Hiddleston as Hades in the live action remake of Hercules HAHAHA
Chris Hemsworth would be a good Hercules, but I don't really see Tom Hiddleston as Hades. Not his type of character. James Woods will always be Hades, but if they want someone different they'll have to find one who can live up to him. Although apparently Bruce Campell would love to do it.
@Ubiq said in Disney animation thread:
The Disney films that are alternate versions like Pete's Dragon or either version of The Jungle Book can be solid but the ones that are straight remakes have consistently been downgrades from the original. It doesn't help either that they've avoided remaking films with substantial problems that might be fixed but have been focusing on more well received films that still look great even today. For instance, why not do a complete overhaul of Home on the Range? Nobody will be angry if you do that and there's a decent chance you'd make more money than the original did.
Far as the trailer goes, the song sounds okay up until that "be"; as is, the delivery throws off the pace of the entire song by drawing out a word in the middle of the sentence and shifts the focus from the sad trailing "world" off at the end.
Made it sound like a pop song, which it is not. I don't care if there will be one for the soundtrack, for the song IN the movie it should not sound like a pop song. Howard Ashman would be appalled.
I don't know if Disney will dare touch Home on the Range again, but Treasure Planet is actually one I wouldn't mind seeing live action.
@Satsuki said in Disney animation thread:
I don't know if Disney will dare touch Home on the Range again, but Treasure Planet is actually one I wouldn't mind seeing live action.
Non-PotC pirate films tend to be box office poison since about the 1960s and Treasure Island adaptations released since then in particular tend to do poorly. Treasure Planet itself basically killed theatrical 2D animation in the United States.
Huh... now that you mention it, it probably should be a major remake project for Disney. Maybe it'd do badly enough to kill that entire remake series.
Even Muppet Treasure Island only barely, barely made it budget back, so it probably actually lost a fair bit of money after advertising and theater cuts.
But then Muppets is weird. Outside of the original film and 2011's The Muppets, none of them have done particularly well. (Though inflation means its a little hard to judge the movies that are 30-40 years old other than the original did VERY well.)
@Shiebs said in [Disney animation thread]
I do think it would be hilarious if we got Chris Hemsworth as Hercules and Tom Hiddleston as Hades in the live action remake of Hercules HAHAHA
Despite how problematic as he is, you get anyone other than James Woods in that role and there is no point.
I mean, there's been no point in ANY of these live remakes other than the ones that actually tried to do something different like Jungle Book or Mulan, but still.
And yeah he's like 75 but the character would inevitably be all CG anyway.
All CG and maybe some really good makeup.
But yeah, Hades is a role James Woods made entirely his own.
It does assume you're going for a point-for-point remake and while I certainly don't think Disney will (or should) do a more myth accurate version of Hercules, that doesn't mean a live-action Hades has to be a repeat of the Woods version. Make him different enough and it's fine.
Obviously, the best idea is just don't do a remake of the film.
Yeah I would not shed a tear if James Woods was not in a live action Hercules remake.
They should just circumvent the issue and go all out and make myth-accurate portrayals of Zeus and Hera as full on shitheels
Do it Disney, I dare you
Throw in Zero to Hero anyway for maximum insane tonal whiplash
LOL. Now wouldn't that be interesting. (and in that Hades would be a cool dude who let his nephew borrow his dog)
The Muses would always be cool and fun, though, myth-accurate or not.
Narrator: No she wasn't.
Hope there's not much of a gap between specials.
The other two are coming next year so there's probably going to be a two and a half to three month gap between each installment.
I really like the new outfits.
Okay, I know we're all highly unimpressed by the new Little Mermaid trailer, but can we have a little love for all the little black girls who are so excited to see an Ariel who looks like them?
https://www.comicsands.com/black-girls-ariel-trailer-tears-2658210097.html?fbclid=IwAR0B-M0ZbFwMg9waGPuNVWHy5ABZ0oNaJ8jtMemlFJ-H_47SZG-m5fKEqEc
It's for reasons like this characters are diversified.
Also had to throw this in here for its massive burn:
Yes, representative is good, but Hollywood ain't doing it for the good aspect of it.
There is no woke pandering, as the far right could see if they had any text/medium interpretation. Hollywood is doing gender swaps and race swaps, or inserting queer character because they want to make the most soulless and laziest films based on some nostalgia hooking IPs and shifting the blame to the "bigot audience" if the film flops.
Not that there aren't bigots loudly screaming on the internet.
I think the 20 second snippet of Part of Your World sounds great. I think it sounds heartfelt and not at all oversung based on a single little run. I'm going to have to compelely reject the idea that the style of singing is at all opposed to properly emoting. I just read this thread and wanted to get my 2 cents in. I'm not super excited for the film or any of the live action remakes (though I think Aladdin was pretty great and a worthy counterpart to the original) but I wanted to give it some love.
Eh, it was a little part of a teaser trailer. Didn't impress me there, but we'll have to see the next trailer to see if there's more promise.
And I doubt the higher-ups at Disney care about the diversity or whatnot, but right now, who cares? These girls are so happy. Once this is done, then we can get started on kicking Disney's ass about more original works for minorities. Tiana was great, but can we get a movie based on an actual African tale?
Regarding Owl's House, is that a new character in the extreme right? I'm having a bit o SU Future PTSD from the poster, but it looks miles better. I think it's the steaming angsty implied.
@puffing-cinema that's Vee. We can't have two Luz running around can we?
Oooooooh, totally forgot she would be there. Yep, thanks for the clarification.
Dynamite is going all in on the Gargs comic with SIX variant covers on the first issue. And they're even getting the front cover of Previews, which for those of you that don't follow comics, is a BIG deal and only given to titles expected to sell a LOT.
And they're showing off the first few pages of art.
Not bad at all, certainly miles better than the SLG run. Still wish I was working on it (and I have tried!) but I can't really complain this time like I did with the SLG run which was just insultingly bad.
YAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY!!!!
That cover looks really nice.
Not sure if I like the Leirix or David Nakayama cover better.
FYI, They're also apparently remastering a Genesis Gargoyles game
They are running it through a blur filter so it looks less pixelated, they're not doing an actual remaster or putting any actual effort into it.
Also, the game is kind of really really terrible, it's a very weird choice to rerelease.
I say this as someone who owned it and played it a lot and actually beat it in the way only a 13 year old with only 5 games to choose from but that REALLY loved the franchise can.
After I beat the game once I never played it again.
I never even knew there was a Gargoyles game.
Man, this is giving me nostalgia. I think I'm gonna watch a few episodes on Disney+.
After I beat the game once I never played it again.
Not really abnormal I’ve beaten good games and haven’t replayed them.
Game was kind of hard and confusing tho.
Not really abnormal I’ve beaten good games and haven’t replayed them.
It is when you only have a dozen games to choose from and you still never go back to the one.
Every other game in my SNES and Genesis collection I beat a ton of times and went back to again and again for years, for lack of options if nothing else. Same reason you'd keep rewatching the same movies and tv shows because they were what you owned and had access to, in those days before the internet.
I spent a week or two playing the gargoyles game to the end and then never wanted to deal with it again. it just sucked.
Yes, now when I have access to hundreds of games and a dozen different consoles, and could buy something new of the internet and download it on a whim, not going back to a given game isn't that big a deal. But back in the 90's when options were way more limited and you were ateenager who only got new gaems for birthday and christmas and what you owned is what you owned? Not so much.
While I would never approve of a sequel to Nightmare Before Christmas, a short I can agree on. Especially if it's a short about Zero.
https://movieweb.com/director-says-the-nightmare-before-christmas-could-continue-disney-short/?utm_source=MW-FB-P&utm_medium=Social-Distribution&utm_campaign=MW-FB-P&fbclid=IwAR0mKKFdBZNTAcRne1oCJdZppaHzYtUPVBkpLuLA02uiR_eY_GGaDEA1zdM
Finished up my rewatch of Owl House and I'm really glad I did. I don't know if it's because it had been too long between season and mid-season breaks or if my dumb brain had trouble focusing, but there were a lot of plot points I missed on my first viewing of Season 2. That said, as great as Season 2 is, I feel it does hit you with a lot of information really fast, which I have to assume is due to Disney cutting the show short.
Still, the attention to detail in this show is amazing. Dana and her crew are really great at keeping track of every single character and doing cool background references. Like in Them's the Breaks Kid we see two girls who are very likely Boscha's future parents. moringmark's comics also really helped me appreciate it with his own expansion on the background characters and, until the show contradicts them, I'm going to consider them canon.
Oh yeah, and when I first heard the Collector I could've sworn he was voiced by Kath Soucie, but apparently it's someone else entirely.
Anyway, guess I finished my rewatch just in time as the S3 is only a few weeks away.
I too thought Kath Soucie.
What is Owl House? Is it on Disney Plus?
@Shiebs said in Disney animation thread:
What is Owl House? Is it on Disney Plus?
Probably the best animated show airing on Disney right now. And yes, both seasons are on Disney Plus. Watch it.
I'll avoid them for the moment. I want to go blind to the finale.
JANUARY??? FUCK THIS. Ain't they done??? C'moooon
The first six minutes shown at NY Comic Con can be found on YouTube.
@puffing-cinema said in Disney animation thread:
JANUARY??? FUCK THIS. Ain't they done??? C'moooon
I' m more offput by the April one, but...
It's animation. It had a pipeline, if they make the thigns in order it can in fact be months before they finish a piece. Jus tusually studios hold them until the whole batch is ready and release them all at once.
I enjoyed that special but it definitely had enough material that it could easily have supported five or six episodes and not felt as rushed as a result.
I few things could have been fleshed out more and paced if they had more time, but I still think they did a great job with the special.
And if anyone missed it, here's the full episode.